Reverse automatic differentiation for optimum design: From adjoint state assembly to gradient computation

Optimization Methods and Software

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 615-627

  Courty, Francois ^a   Dervieux, Alain ^a   Koobus, Bruno ^b   Hascoët, Laurent ^a  

^a INRIA   (France)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Adjoint equations; Automatic differentiation; Check pointing; Computational fluid dynamics; Data dependence analysis; Optimum design

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; DATA REDUCTION; OPTIMIZATION; PROBLEM SOLVING;

AUTOMATIC DIFFERENTIATION; OPTIMAL DESIGN PROBLEMS;

OPTIMAL SYSTEMS;

EID: 0242720588     PISSN: 10556788     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10556780310001610501     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. F. Beux (1994). Shape optimization of an Euler flow in a nozzle. Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics, 55, 115-131.
2. G. Corliss, C. Faure, A. Griewank, L. Hascoet and U. Naumann (Eds.) (2001). Automatic Differentiation of Algorithms, from Simulation to Optimization. Springer, Selected proceedings of AD2000, Nice, France.
3. A. Dadone and B. Grossman (2000). Progressive optimization of inverse fluid dynamic design problems. Computer and Fluids, 29, 1-32.
4. J.-A. Desideri and P.W. Hemker (1995). Convergence analysis of iterative implicit and defect-correction algorithms for hyperbolic problems. SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 88-118.
5. J. Francescatto and A. Dervieux (1998). A semi-coarsening strategy for unstructured multigrid based on agglomeration. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 26, 927-957.
6. R. Giering (1997). Tangent linear and adjoint model compiler, users manual. Technical report, 1997. [www http://www.autodiff.com/tamc]
7. J.C. Gilbert (1992). Automatic differentiation and iterative processes. Optimization Methods and Software, 1, 13-21.
8. M.-B. Giles (2001). Adjoint methods for aeronautical design. In Proceedings of the ECCOMAS CFD Conference, 2001.
9. A. Griewank (2000). Evaluating Derivatives: Principles and Techniques of Algorithmic Differentiation. SIAM, Frontiers, Applied Mathematics, 2000.
10. A. Griewank and Ch. Faure (2002). Reduced gradients and Hessians from fixed point iteration for state equations. Numerical Algorithms, 30(2), 113-139.
11. L. Hascoet (2001). The data-dependence graph of adjoint programs. Research report 4167, INRIA, 2001.
12. L. Hascoet, S. Fidanova and C. Held (2001). Adjoining independent computations, in [2], 185-190.
13. P. Hovland, B. Mohammadi and C. Bischof (1997). Automatic differentiation of Navier-stokes computations. Technical Report MCS-P687-0997, Argonne National Laboratory, 1997.
14. INRIA Tropics team. On-line documentation of the Tapenade AD tool. Technical report. [www http://www.inria.fr/tropics]
15. A. Jameson (1988). Aerodynamic design via control theory. Report 1824 MAE, Princeton University, New Jersey.
16. N. Marco and A. Dervieux (1995). Numerical optimizers for aerodynamic design using transonic finite-element solvers. Final report, BRITEECARP, 1995.
17. B. Mohammadi (1997). Practical application to fluid flows of automatic differentiation for design problems. Von Karman Lecture Series, 1997.
18. Y. Saad and M.H. Schultz (1986). Gmres: A generalized minimal residual algorithm for solving nonsymmetric linear systems. J. Sci. Comput., 7, 856-869.
19. C. Sevin (1999). Optimisation de formes en mécanique des fluides numérique. PhD Thesis, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, 1999.
20. S. Taásan, G. Kuruvila and M.D. Salas (1992). Aerodynamic design and optimization in one shot. In 30th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Rena, Nevada, AIAA Paper 91-0025, 1992.