Qualitative and quantitative assessment of adenosine triphosphate stress whole-heart dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging using 256-slice computed tomography

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 12, 2013, Pages

  Kurata, Akira ^a   Kawaguchi, Naoto ^a   Kido, Teruhito ^a   Inoue, Katsuji ^a   Suzuki, Jun ^a   Ogimoto, Akiyoshi ^a   Funada, Junichi ^b   Higaki, Jitsuo ^a   Miyagawa, Masao ^a   Vembar, Mani ^c   Mochizuki, Teruhito ^a  

^a EHIME UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b National Hospital Organization Ehime Medical Center   (Japan)

^c PHILIPS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE;

CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DRUG EFFECTS; FEMALE; HEART; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; CORONARY CIRCULATION; CORONARY STENOSIS; FEMALE; HEART; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84893456897     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083950     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, Goldstein JA (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 46: 552-557. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.05.056. PubMed: 16053973. (Pubitemid 41040301)
2. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CAG, Runza G, McFadden EP et al. (2005) High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 112: 2318-2323. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.533471. PubMed: 16203914. (Pubitemid 41464575)
3. Iriart X, Brunot S, Coste P, Montaudon M, Dos-Santos P et al. (2007) Early characterization of atherosclerotic coronary plaques with multidetector computed tomography in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a comparative study with intravascular ultrasound. Eur Radiol 17: 2581-2588. doi:10.1007/s00330-007-0665-3. PubMed: 17549491.
4. Motoyama S, Sarai M, Harigaya H, Anno H, Inoue K et al. (2009) Computed tomographic angiography characteristics of atherosclerotic plaques subsequently resulting in acute coronary syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 54: 49-57. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.02.068. PubMed: 19555840.
5. Hachamovitch R, Hayes SW, Friedman JD, Cohen I, Berman DS (2003) Comparison of the short-term survival benefit associated with revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with no prior coronary artery disease undergoing stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation 107: 2900-2907. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000072790.23090.41. PubMed: 12771008.
6. Miyagawa M, Kumano S, Sekiya M, Watanabe K, Akutzu H et al. (1995) Thallium-201 myocardial tomography with intravenous infusion of adenosine triphosphate in diagnosis of coronary artery disease. JACC 26: 1196-1201. doi:10.1016/0735-1097(95)00304-5. PubMed: 7594032.
7. Nakajima K, Nishimura T (2012) Cardiovascular events in Japan. Lessons from the J-ACCESS multicenter prognostic study using myocardial perfusion imaging. Circ J 76: 1313-1321. doi:10.1253/circj.CJ-12-0260. PubMed: 22572460.
8. Palmas W, Friedman JD, Diamond GA, Silber H, Kiat H et al. (1995) Incremental value of simultaneous assessment of myocardial function and perfusion with technetium-99m sestamibi for prediction of extent of coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 25: 1024-1031. doi:10.1016/0735-1097(94)00523- S. PubMed: 7897112.
9. Jahnke C, Nagel E, Gebker R, Kokocinski T, Kelle S et al. (2007) Prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance stress tests: adenosine stress perfusion and dobutamine stress wall motion imaging. Circulation 115: 1769-1776. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA. 106.652016. PubMed: 17353441.
10. Sakuma H, Suzawa N, Ichikawa Y, Makino K, Hirano T et al. (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of stress first-pass contrast-enhanced myocardial perfusion MRI compared with stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185: 95-102. doi:10.2214/ajr.185.1.01850095. PubMed: 15972407.
11. Porter TR, Adolphson M, High RR, Smith LM, Olson J et al. (2011) Rapid detection of coronary artery stenoses with real-time perfusion echocardiography during regadenoson stress. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 4: 628-635. doi:10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.111.966341. PubMed: 21946702.
12. Kurata A, Mochizuki T, Koyama Y, Haraikawa T, Suzuki J et al. (2005) Myocardial perfusion imaging using adenosine triphosphate stress multi-slice spiral computed tomography: alternative to stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Circ J 69: 550-557. doi:10.1253/circj.69.550. PubMed: 15849441. (Pubitemid 40745727)
13. Cury RC, Magalhães TA, Borges AC, Shiozaki AA, Lemos PA et al. (2010) Dipyridamole stress and rest myocardial perfusion by 64-detector row computed tomography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 106: 310-315. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.03.025. PubMed: 20643238.
14. George RT, Arbab-Zadeh A, Miller JM, Kitagawa K, Chang HJ et al. (2009) Adenosine stress 64- and 256-row detector computed tomography angiography and perfusion imaging: a pilot study evaluating the transmural extent of perfusion abnormalities to predict atherosclerosis causing myocardial ischemia. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2: 174-182. doi:10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.108.813766. PubMed: 19808590.
15. Hosokawa K, Kurata A, Kido T, Shikata F, Imagawa H et al. (2011) Transmural perfusion gradient in adenosine triphosphate stress myocardial perfusion computed tomography. Circ J 75: 1905-1912. doi:10.1253/circj.CJ-10- 1144. PubMed: 21697608.
16. Kido T, Kurata A, Higashino H, Inoue Y, Kanza RE et al. (2008) Quantification of regional myocardial blood flow using first-pass multidetector-row computed tomography and adenosine triphosphate in coronary artery disease. Circ J 72: 1086-1091. doi:10.1253/circj.72.1086. PubMed: 18577816. (Pubitemid 351957073)
17. Ho KT, Chua KC, Klotz E, Panknin C (2010) Stress and rest dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging by evaluation of complete time-attenuation curves with dual-source CT. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 3: 811-820. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg. 2010.05.009. PubMed: 20705260.
18. So A, Wisenberg G, Islam A, Amann J, Romano W et al. (2012) Non-invasive assessment of functionally relevant coronary artery stenoses with quantitative CT perfusion: preliminary clinical experiences. Eur Radiol 22: 39-50. doi:10.1007/s00330-011-2260-x. PubMed: 21938441.
19. Wang Y, Qin L, Shi X, Zeng Y, Jing H et al. (2012) Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging with second-generation dual-source CT: comparison with conventional catheter coronary angiography and SPECT nuclear myocardial perfusion Imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198: 521-529. doi:10.2214/AJR.11.7552. PubMed: 22357991.
20. Dwivedi G, Dowsley TF, Chow BJ (2012) Assessment of cardiac computed tomography-myocardial perfusion imaging - promise and challenges -. Circ J 76: 544-552. doi:10.1253/circj.CJ-11-1427. PubMed: 22327029.
21. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, Jacobs AK, Kaul S et al. (2002) Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 105: 539-542. doi:10.1161/hc0402.102975. PubMed: 11815441. (Pubitemid 34262671)
22. Nakauchi Y, Iwanaga Y, Ikuta S, Kudo M, Kobuke K et al. (2012) Quantitative myocardial perfusion analysis using multi-row detector CT in acute myocardial infarction. Heart 98: 566-572. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2011-300915. PubMed: 22285970.
23. Eastwood JD, Lev MH, Azhari T, Lee TY, Barboriak DP et al. (2002) CT perfusion scanning with deconvolution analysis: pilot study in patients with acute middle cerebral artery stroke. Radiology 222: 227-236. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2221010471. PubMed: 11756730. (Pubitemid 34031492)
24. Meier P, Zierler KL (1954) On the theory of the indicator-dilution method for measurement of blood flow and volume. J Appl Physiol 6: 731-744. PubMed: 13174454.
25. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, Gensini GG, Gott VL et al. (1975) A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 51: 5-40. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.51.4.5. PubMed: 1116248.
26. NIPPON DATA80 Research Group (2006) Risk assessment chart for death from cardiovascular disease based on a 19-year follow-up study of a Japanese representative population. Circ J 70: 1249-1255. doi:10.1253/circj.70.1249. PubMed: 16998254.
27. Wolff SD, Schwitter J, Coulden R, Friedrich MG, Bluemke DA et al. R (2004) Myocardial first-pass perfusion magnetic resonance imaging: a multicenter dose-ranging study. Circulation 110: 732-737. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000138106. 84335.62. PubMed: 15289374. (Pubitemid 39056274)
28. Primak AN, Dong Y, Dzyubak OP, Jorgensen SM, McCollough CH et al. (2007) A technical solution to avoid partial scan artifacts in cardiac MDCT. Med Phys 34: 4726-4737. doi:10.1118/1.2805476. PubMed: 18196800. (Pubitemid 350197711)
29. Rossi A, Uitterdijk A, Dijkshoorn M, Klotz E, Dharampal A et al. (2013) Quantification of myocardial blood flow by adenosine-stress CT perfusion imaging in pigs during various degrees of stenosis correlates well with coronary artery blood flow and fractional flow reserve. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 14: 331-318. doi:10.1093/ehjci/jes150. PubMed: 22843541.
30. Koyama Y, Matsuoka H, Mochizuki T, Higashino H, Kawakami H et al. (2005) Assessment of reperfused acute myocardial infarction with two-phase contrast-enhanced helical CT: prediction of left ventricular function and wall thickness. Radiology 235: 804-811. doi:10.1148/radiol.2353030441. PubMed: 15833978. (Pubitemid 40695873)
31. Nieman K, Shapiro MD, Ferencik M, Nomura CH, Abbara S et al. (2008) Reperfused myocardial infarction: contrast-enhanced 64-Section CT in comparison to MR imaging. Radiology 247: 49-56. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2471070332. PubMed: 18372464.
32. Funama Y, Taguchi K, Utsunomiya D, Oda S, Yanaga Y, et al. (2011) Combination of a low-tube-voltage technique with hybrid Iterative reconstruction (iDose) algorithm at coronary computed tomographic angiography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 35: 480-485.