Online course delivery modes and design methods in the radiologic sciences

Radiologic Technology

Volumn 85, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 27-36

  Kowalczyk, Nina ^a   Copley, Stacey ^a  

^a THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY WEXNER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERNET; METHODOLOGY; ONLINE SYSTEM; RADIOLOGY; REVIEW; STATISTICS; TEACHING; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; CURRICULUM; DATA COLLECTION; INTERNET; ONLINE SYSTEMS; RADIOLOGY; TEACHING; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84893428362     PISSN: 00338397     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Allen IE, Seaman J. Class differences: online education in the United States, 2010. http://sloanconsortium.org/sites/default/files/class_differences.pdf. Published November 2010. Accessed July 3, 2012.
2. Kim KJ, Bonk CJ. The future of online teaching and learning in higher education: the survey says.. Educause Q. 2006;4:22-30.
3. Joint Review Committee on Education in Radiologic Technology: Online Education Survey. Chicago, IL: 2009.
4. Martino S, Odle T. New instructional technology. Radiol Technol. 2008;80(1):67-74.
5. Dalsgaard C. Social software: e-learning beyond learning management systems. Eur J Open Distance E-Learning. www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2006/Christian_Dalsgaard.htm. Published December 7, 2006. Accessed July 15, 2013.
6. Cauble KC, Chernow H. A distance learning project in the radiologic sciences. Radiol Technol. 1996;67(4):307-310.
7. Britt R. Online education: a survey of faculty and students. Radiol Technol. 2006;77(3):183-190.
8. Johnston J. Effectiveness of online instructions in radiologic sciences. Radiol Technol. 2008;79(6):497-506.
9. Nachmias R, Mioduser D, Oren A, Ram J. Web-supported emergent-collaboration in higher education courses. J Educ Technol Soc. 2000;3(3):94-104.
10. Moallem M. Applying constructivist and objectivist learning theories in the design of a Web-based course: implications for practice. J Educ Technol Soc. 2001;4(3):113-125.
11. Debourgh GA. Simple elegance: course management systems as pedagogical infrastructure to enhance science learning. The Technology Source Archives. http://technologysource.org/article/simple_elegance. Published May/June 2002. Accessed July 15, 2013.
12. Selim HM. Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: confirmatory models. Comput Educ. 2007;49(2):396-413.
13. Ezziane Z. Information technology literacy: implications on teaching and learning. Educ Technol Soc. 2007;10(3):175-191.
14. Volery T, Lord D. Critical success factors in online education. Int J Educ Manage. 2000;14(5):216-223.
15. Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovation. New York, NY: The Free Press; 1983.
16. National Center for Education Statistics. Fast facts: distance learning. http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=80. Accessed July 15, 2013.
17. Gaytan J, McEwen B. Effective online instructional and assessment strategies. Am J Distance Educ. 2007;21(3):117-132.
18. Pintrich P, Smith D, Garcia T, McKeachie W. A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning; 1991:9-63.
19. Ary D, Jacobs LC, Sorensen CK, Razavieh A. Validity and reliability. In: Introduction to Research in Education. Independence, KY: Cengage Learning; 2002:242-247.