Modelling semantic role plausibility in human sentence processing

EACL 2006 - 11th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 345-352

  Padó, Ulrike ^a   Crocker, Matthew ^a   Keller, Frank ^b  

^a SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASS-BASED; HUMAN SENTENCE PROCESSING; PREDICTION TASKS; PROBABILISTIC MODELING; SEMANTIC ROLES; SPARSE DATA; SPARSE DATA PROBLEM;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; SEMANTICS;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84893371140     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Bard, E. G., Robertson, D., and Sorace, A. (1996). Magnitude estimation of linguistic acceptability. Language, 72(1), 32-68.
2. Carreras, X. and Márquez, L. (2005). Introduction to the CoNLL-2005 shared task: Semantic role labeling. In Proceedings of CoNLL-2005.
3. Crocker, M. and Brants, T. (2000). Wide-coverage probabilistic sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29(6), 647-669.
4. Gedeon, T., Parker, A., and Dimitrov, A. (2003). Information distortion and neural coding. Canadian Applied Mathematics Quarterly, 10(1), 33-70.
5. Gildea, D. and Jurafsky, D. (2002). Automatic labeling of semantic roles. Computational Linguistics, 28(3), 245-288.
6. Giuglea, A.-M. and Moschitti, A. (2004). Knowledge discovery using FrameNet, VerbNet and PropBank. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Ontology and Knowledge Discovering at ECML 2004.
7. Jurafsky, D. (1996). A probabilistic model of lexical and syntactic access and disambiguation. Cognitive Science, 20, 137-194.
8. Keller, F. and Lapata, M. (2003). Using the web to obtain frequencies for unseen bigrams. Computational Linguistics, 29(3), 459-484.
9. Litkowski, K. (2004). Senseval-3 task: Automatic labeling of semantic roles. In Proceedings of Senseval-3: The Third International Workshop on the Evaluation of Systems for the Semantic Analysis of Text.
10. Marx, Z. (2004). Structure-Based computational aspects of similarity and analogy in natural language. Ph.D. thesis, Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
11. McRae, K., Spivey-Knowlton, M., and Tanenhaus, M. (1998). Modeling the influence of thematic fit (and other constraints) in on-line sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 283-312.
12. Narayanan, S. and Jurafsky, D. (2002). A Bayesian model predicts human parse preference and reading time in sentence processing. In S. B. T. G. Dietterich and Z. Ghahramani, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 14, pages 59-65. MIT Press.
13. Tishby, N., and Pereira., F. C., and Bialek, W. (1999). The information bottleneck method. In Proc. of the 37-th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control and Computing, pages 368-377.
14. Trueswell, J., Tanenhaus, M., and Garnsey, S. (1994). Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 285-318.