Lemmatization and Lexicalized Statistical Parsing of Morphologically Rich Languages: The Case of French

1st Workshop on Statistical Parsing of Morphologically-Rich Languages, SPMRL 2010 - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 85-93

  Seddah, Djamé ^a   Chrupała, Grzegorz ^b   Çetinoğlu, Özlem ^c   van Genabith, Josef ^c   Candito, Marie ^a  

^a INRIA   (France)

^b SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c DUBLIN CITY UNIVERSITY   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

DATA SPARSENESS; LEMMATIZATION; PARSING PROCESS; PERFORMANCE; STATISTICAL PARSING; TREEBANKS;

FORESTRY;

EID: 84893360441     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Anne Abeillé, Lionel Clément, and François Toussenel, 2003. Building a Treebank for French. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
2. Miriam Butt, María-Eugenia Niño, and Frédérique Segond. 1999. A Grammar Writer's Cookbook. CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA.
3. Aoife Cahill, Michael Burke, Ruth O'Donovan, Josef van Genabith, and Andy Way. 2004. Long-Distance Dependency Resolution in Automatically Acquired Wide-Coverage PCFG-Based LFG Approximations. In Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 320-327, Barcelona, Spain.
4. Marie Candito and Benoît Crabbé. 2009. Improving generative statistical parsing with semi-supervised word clustering. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Parsing Technologies (IWPT'09), pages 138-141, Paris, France, October. Association for Computational Linguistics.
5. Marie Candito, Benoit Crabbé, and Djamé Seddah. 2009. On statistical parsing of french with supervised and semi-supervised strategies. In EACL 2009 Workshop Grammatical inference for Computational Linguistics, Athens, Greece.
6. Eugene Charniak. 2000. A maximum entropy inspired parser. In Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL 2000), pages 132-139, Seattle, WA.
7. Grzegorz Chrupała, Georgiana Dinu, and Josef van Genabith. 2008. Learning morphology with morfette. In In Proceedings of LREC 2008, Marrakech, Morocco. ELDA/ELRA.
8. Grzegorz Chrupała. 2008. Towards a machine-learning architecture for lexical functional grammar parsing. Ph.D. thesis, Dublin City University.
9. Grzegorz Chrupała. 2010. Morfette: A tool for supervised learning of morphology. http://sites.google.com/site/morfetteweb/. Version 0.3.1.
10. Michael Collins. 1999. Head Driven Statistical Models for Natural Language Parsing. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
11. Benoit Crabbé and Marie Candito. 2008. Expériences d'analyse syntaxique statistique du français. In Actes de la 15ème Conférence sur le Traitement Automatique des Langues Naturelles (TALN'08), pages 45-54, Avignon, France.
12. Pascal Denis and Benoît Sagot. 2009. Coupling an annotated corpus and a morphosyntactic lexicon for state-of-the-art pos tagging with less human effort. In Proc. of PACLIC, Hong Kong, China.
13. Christy Doran, Dania Egedi, Beth Ann Hockey, B. Srinivas, and Martin Zaidel. 1994. Xtag system: A wide coverage grammar for english. In Proceedings of the 15th conference on Computational linguistics, pages 922-928, Morristown, NJ, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
14. Yoav Freund and Robert E. Schapire. 1999. Large margin classification using the perceptron algorithm. Machine learning, 37(3):277-296.
15. Yoav Goldberg, Reut Tsarfaty, Meni Adler, and Michael Elhadad. 2009. Enhancing unlexicalized parsing performance using a wide coverage lexicon, fuzzy tag-set mapping, and EM-HMM-based lexical probabilities. In Proc. of EACL-09, pages 327-335, Athens, Greece.
16. Mitchell P. Marcus, Beatrice Santorini, and Mary Ann Marcinkiewicz. 1994. Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn TreeBank. Computational Linguistics, 19(2):313-330.
17. Slav Petrov, Leon Barrett, Romain Thibaux, and Dan Klein. 2006. Learning accurate, compact, and interpretable tree annotation. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and 44th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Sydney, Australia, July. Association for Computational Linguistics.
18. Ines Rehbein and Josef van Genabith. 2007. Treebank annotation schemes and parser evaluation for german. In Proceedings of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning (EMNLPCoNLL), Prague.
19. Benoit Sagot, Lionel Clément, Eric V. de La Clergerie, and Pierre Boullier. 2006. The lefff 2 syntactic lexicon for french: Architecture, acquisition, use. Proc. of LREC 06, Genoa, Italy.
20. Geoffrey Sampson and Anna Babarczy. 2003. A test of the leaf-ancestor metric for parse accuracy. Natural Language Engineering, 9(04):365-380.
21. Natalie Schluter and Josef van Genabith. 2007. Preparing, restructuring, and augmenting a French Treebank: Lexicalised parsers or coherent treebanks? In Proc. of PACLING 07, Melbourne, Australia.
22. Djamé Seddah, Marie Candito, and Benoit Crabbé. 2009. Cross parser evaluation and tagset variation: A French Treebank study. In Proceedings of the 11th Internation Conference on Parsing Technologies (IWPT'09), pages 150-161, Paris, France, October. Association for Computational Linguistics.
23. Yannick Versley and Ines Rehbein. 2009. Scalable discriminative parsing for german. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Parsing Technologies (IWPT'09), pages 134-137, Paris, France, October. Association for Computational Linguistics.