Coupling an annotated corpus and a morphosyntactic lexicon for state-of-the-art pos tagging with less human effort

PACLIC 23 - Proceedings of the 23rd Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation

Volumn 1, Issue , 2009, Pages 110-119

  Denis, Pascal ^a   Sagot, Benoît ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

Author keywords

French; Language resource development; Maximum entropy models; Morphosyntactic lexicon; Part of speech tagging

Indexed keywords

FRENCH; LANGUAGE RESOURCES; MAXIMUM ENTROPY MODELS; MORPHOSYNTACTIC LEXICON; PART OF SPEECH TAGGING;

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

INFORMATION ANALYSIS;

EID: 84857727231     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Abeillé, A., L. Clément, and F. Toussenel. 2003. Building a treebank for French. In A. Abeillé, editor, Treebanks. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
2. Berger, A., S. D. Pietra, and V. D. Pietra. 1996. A maximum entropy approach to natural language processing. Computational Linguistics, 22(1):39-71.
3. Candito, M., B. Crabbé, and D. Seddah. 2009. On statistical parsing of French with supervised and semi-supervised strategies. In Proceedings of the EACL'09 workshop on Grammatical Inference for computational linguistics, Athens, Greece.
4. Crabbé, B. and M. Candito. 2008. Expériences d'analyses syntaxique statistique du français. In Proceedings of TALN'08, Avignon, France.
5. Hajič, J. 2000. Morphological Tagging: Data vs. Dictionaries. In Proceedings of ANLP'00, pages 94-101, Seattle, WA, USA.
6. Lafferty, J. D., A. McCallum, and F. C. N. Pereira. 2001. Conditional random fields: Probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. In ICML, pages 282-289.
7. Malouf, R. 2002. A comparison of algorithms for maximum entropy parameter estimation. In Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Natural Language Learning, pages 49-55, Taipei, Taiwan.
8. Manning, C. D. and H. Schütze. 1999. Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
9. Marcus, M. P., M. A. Marcinkiewicz, and B. Santorini. 1993. Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19(2):313-330.
10. Ratnaparkhi, A. 1996. A maximum entropy model for part-of-speech tagging. In Proceedings of International Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 133-142.
11. Sagot, B. 2005. Automatic acquisition of a Slovak lexicon from a raw corpus. In Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 3658, Proceedings of TSD'05, pages 156-163, Karlovy Vary, Czech Republic. Springer-Verlag.
12. Sagot, B., L. Clément, É. de La Clergerie, and P. Boullier. 2006. The Lefff 2 syntactic lexicon for French: architecture, acquisition, use. In Proceedings of LREC'06, Lisbon, Portugal.
13. Schmid, H. 1994. Probabilistic part-of-speech tagging using decision trees. In Proceedings of International Conference on New Methods in Language Processing, Manchester, UK.
14. Toutanova, K. and C. D. Manning. 2000. Enriching the knowledge sources used in a maximum entropy part-of-speech tagger. In Proceedings of International Conference on New Methods in Language Processing, pages 63-70, Hong Kong.