A LAF/GrAF based encoding scheme for underspecified representations of syntactic annotations

Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 2262-2269

  Kountz, Manuel ^a   Heid, Ulrich ^b   Eckart, Kerstin ^b  

^a Graduate Programme GRK 609   (Germany)

^b Institut fur Mikroelektronik Stuttgart   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA MINING; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ENCODING (SYMBOLS); LINGUISTICS; SYNTACTICS;

DEPENDENCY STRUCTURES; EFFICIENT ENCODING; ENCODING SCHEMES; FLEXIBLE FRAMEWORK; LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS; LINGUISTIC ANNOTATIONS; SYNTACTIC AMBIGUITIES; SYNTACTIC ANNOTATION;

SIGNAL ENCODING;

EID: 84893283751     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. C. F. Baker, C. J. Fillmore, B. Cronin. 2003. The Structure of the FrameNet Database. International Journal of Lexicography, 16 (3).
2. S. Bird, M. Liberman. 2001. A formal Framework for linguistic Annotation. Speech Communication, 33(1, 2):23-60.
3. S. Brants, S. Dipper, S. Hansen, W. Lezius, G. Smith. 2002. The TIGER treebank. Proceedings of the Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories. Sozopol/Bulgaria.
4. A. Burchardt, K. Erk, A. Frank, A. Kowalski, S. Padó, M. Pinkal. 2006. The SALSA Corpus: a German corpus resource for lexical semantics. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation. Genoa/Italy.
5. J. Carletta, D. McKelvie, A. Isard, A. Mengel, M. Klein, M. B. Møller. 2004. A generic approach to software support for linguistic annotation using XML. In G. Sampson and D. McCarthy, editors, Corpus Linguistics: Readings in a Widening Discipline, chapter 39. Continuum International, London/New York.
6. J. Clark, S. DeRose. 1999. XML Path Language (XPath) Version 1.0 W3C Recommendation. The W3C Consortium.
7. J. Dörre. 1996. Efficient Construction of Underspecified Semantics under Massive Ambiguity. Proceedings of the Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, (1997). 386-393.
8. R. Eckart, E. Teich. 2007. An XML-based data model for flexible Representation and Query of linguistically interpreted Corpora. In G. Rehm, A. Witt, L. Lemnitzer, editors, Data Structures for Linguistic Resources and Applications, (= Proc. of GLDV Conf. 2007), Tübingen/Germany.
9. U. Engel. 1996. Deutsche Grammatik. Julius Groos, Heidelberg/Germany, 3. korrigierte Auflage.
10. C. Laprun, J. G. Fiscus, J. Garofolo, S. Pajot. 2002. A practical Introduction to ATLAS. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation. Las Palmas/Spain.
11. N. Ide, L. Romary. 2006. Representing Linguistic Corpora and Their Annotations. Proceedings of the 5th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference. Genoa/Italy.
12. N. Ide, K. Suderman. 2007. GrAF: A Graph-based Format for Linguistic Annotations. Proceedings of the Linguistic Annotation Workshop, 1-8, Prague/Czech Republic.
13. M. Schiehlen. 2003. A Cascaded Finite-State Parser for German. Proceedings of the Research Note Sessions of the 10th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Budapest/Hungary.
14. H. Schmid. 2004. Efficient Parsing of Highly Ambiguous Context-Free Grammars with Bit Vectors. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. Geneva, Switzerland (2004).
15. I. Schröder. 2002. Natural Language Parsing with Graded Constraints. PhD thesis, Universität Hamburg, Fachbereich Informatik.
16. K. Spranger, M. Kountz. 2007. Efficient Ambiguity-Handling using underspecified Representations. In G. Rehm, A. Witt, L. Lemnitzer, editors, Data Structures for Linguistic Resources and Applications (= Proc. of GLDV Conf. 2007), Tübingen/Germany.