Quality, trust, and utility of scientific data on the web: Towards a joint model

Proceedings of the 3rd International Web Science Conference, WebSci 2011

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages

  Gamble, Matthew ^a   Goble, Carole ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Data quality; Data sharing; Decision networks; Science; Trust

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); GENE ONTOLOGY;

DATA QUALITY; DATA SET; DATA SHARING; DECISION NETWORK; GENE ONTOLOGY ANNOTATIONS; JOINT MODELS; PROPERTY; SCIENCE; SCIENTIFIC DATA; TRUST;

GENES;

EID: 84893275330     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2527031.2527048     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (47)

1. Open knowledge foundation. http://okfn.org/.
2. OpenWetWare. http://openwetware.org/wiki/Main-Page.
3. Science commons. http://sciencecommons.org.
4. Spatial Data Transfer Standard (SDTS). http://mcmcweb.er.usgs.gov/sdts/ standard.html.
5. Big Data Special. Nature, 455(7209), Sept. 2008.
6. Special Issue: Dealing with Data. Science, 331(6018):639-806, Feb. 2011.
7. Data observation network for earth (dataone). http://www.dataone.org, accessed 23/3/2010.
8. J. E. Alexander and M. A. Tate. Web Wisdom; How to Evaluate and Create Information Quality on the Web. May 1999.
9. A. Bairoch, R. Apweiler, C. H. Wu, W. C. Barker, B. Boeckmann, S. Ferro, E. Gasteiger, H. Huang, R. Lopez, M. Magrane, M. J. Martin, D. A. Natale, C. O'Donovan, N. Redaschi, and L.-S. L. Yeh. The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt). Nucleic acids research, 33(Database issue):D154-9, Jan. 2005.
10. C. Batini, C. Cappiello, C. Francalanci, and A. Maurino. Methodologies for data quality assessment and improvement. ACM Computing Surveys, 41(3):1-52, July 2009.
11. C. Batini and M. Scannapieco. Data Quality: Concepts, Methodologies and Techniques. Data-Centric Systems and Applications. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2006.
12. C. Bizer. Quality-Driven Information Filtering in the Context of Web-Based Information Systems. PhD thesis, Freie Universität Berlin, 2007.
13. G. Boulton, M. Rawlins, P. Vallance, and M. Walport. Science as a public enterprise: The case for open data. Lancet, 377(9778):1633-5, May 2011.
14. T. J. Buza, F. M. McCarthy, N. Wang, S. M. Bridges, and S. C. Burgess. Gene Ontology annotation quality analysis in model eukaryotes. Nucleic acids research, 36(2):e12, Feb. 2008.
15. E. Camon, M. Magrane, D. Barrell, V. Lee, E. Dimmer, J. Maslen, D. Binns, N. Harte, R. Lopez, and R. Apweiler. The Gene Ontology Annotation (GOA) Database: sharing knowledge in Uniprot with Gene Ontology. Nucleic acids research, 32(Database issue):D262-6, Jan. 2004.
16. D. De Roure, C. Goble, and R. Stevens. The design and realisation of the Experimentmy Virtual Research Environment for social sharing of workows. Future Generation Computer Systems, 25(5):561-567, May 2009.
17. P. N. Edwards. Beyond the ivory tower. "A vast machine": standards as social technology. Science (New York, N.Y.), 304(5672):827-8, May 2004.
18. M. J. Eppler and P. Muenzenmayer. Measuring Information Quality in the Web Context. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Information Quality (ICIQ-02), pages 187-196, 2002.
19. D. Field, S.-A. Sansone, A. Collis, T. Booth, P. Dukes, S. K. Gregurick, K. Kennedy, P. Kolar, E. Kolker, M. Maxon, S. Millard, A.-M. Mugabushaka, N. Perrin, J. E. Remacle, K. Remington, P. Rocca-Serra, C. F. Taylor, M. Thorley, B. Tiwari, and J. Wilbanks. Megascience. 'Omics data sharing. Science (New York, N.Y.), 326(5950):234-6, Oct. 2009.
20. D. Fourches, E. Muratov, and A. Tropsha. Trust, but verify: on the importance of chemical structure curation in cheminformatics and QSAR modeling research. Journal of chemical information and modeling, 50(7):1189-204, July 2010.
21. Y. Gil and D. Artz. Towards content trust of web resources. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 5(4):227-239, 2007.
22. R. Giordano. The Scientist: Secretive, Selfish or Reticent? A Social Network Analysis. In E-Social Science conference, Ann Arbor, MI, 2007.
23. J. Golbeck. Compuing and Applying Trust in Web Based Social Networks. Phd, University of Maryland, 2005.
24. O. Hartig and J. Zhao. Using Web Data Provenance for Quality Assessment. In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on the role of Semantic Web in Provenance Management at ISWC2009, Washington D.C., 2009.
25. T. Hey, S. Tansley, and K. Tolle, editors. The Fourth Paradigm: Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery. Microsoft Research, Redmond, Washington, 2009.
26. D. Hull, S. R. Pettifer, and D. B. Kell. Defrosting the digital library: Bibliographic tools for the next generation web. PLoS Comput Biol, 4(10):e1000204, 10 2008.
27. M. A. Jeusfeld, C. Quix, and M. Jarke. Design and Analysis of Quality Information for Data Warehouses. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling, number 1, 1998.
28. J. M. Juran. Quality Control Handbook. Mcgraw-Hill (Tx), 3rd edition, 1974.
29. K. Kelton, K. R. Fleischmann, and W. A. Wallace. Trust in digital information. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(3):363-374, Feb. 2008.
30. U. B. Kjæ rulff and A. L. Madsen. Bayesian Networks and Inuence Diagrams. Information Science and Statistics. Springer New York, New York, NY, 2008.
31. S. A. Knight and J. Burn. Developing a framework for assessing information quality on the world wide web. Informing Science, 8, 2005.
32. Y. W. Lee, D. M. Strong, B. K. Kahn, and R. Y. Wang. AIMQ: A methodology for information quality assessment. Information & Management, 40(2):133 - 146, 2002.
33. P. Lord, A. Macdonald, R. Sinnot, D. Ecklund, M. Westhead, and A. Jones. Large-scale data sharing in the life sciences: Data standards, incentives, barriers and funding models. Technical report, 2005.
34. A. Martinez and J. Hammer. Making quality count in biological data sources. In Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on Information quality in information systems - IQIS '05, page 16, New York, New York, USA, 2005. ACM Press.
35. P. Missier. Modelling and Computing the Quality of Information in e-Science. PhD thesis, The University of Manchester, 2008.
36. L. Moreau, J. Freire, J. Futrelle, R. McGrath, J. Myers, and P. Paulson. The Open Provenance Model : An Overview, volume 5272 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 323-326. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008.
37. F. Naumann. Quality-Driven Query Answering for Integrated Information Systems, volume 2261 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2002.
38. F. Naumann and C. Rolker. Assessment methods for information quality criteria. In B. D. Klein and D. F. Rossin, editors, IQ, pages 148-162. MIT, 2000.
39. M. Neil, N. Fenton, and L. Nielson. Building large-scale Bayesian networks. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 15(3):257-284, Sept. 2000.
40. H. Parkinson, U. Sarkans, M. Shojatalab, N. Abeygunawardena, S. Contrino, R. Coulson, A. Farne, G. Garcia Lara, E. Holloway, M. Kapushesky, P. Lilja, G. Mukherjee, A. Oezcimen, T. Rayner, P. Rocca-Serra, A. Sharma, S. Sansone, and A. Brazma. ArrayExpress - a public repository for microarray gene expression data at the EBI. Nucl. Acids Res., 33(suppl 1):D553-555, Jan. 2005.
41. L. L. Pipino, Y. W. Lee, and R. Y. Wang. Data quality assessment. Communications of the ACM, 45(4ve):211-218, Apr. 2002.
42. M. Scannapieco, A. Virgillito, C. Marchetti, M. Mecella, and R. Baldoni. The architecture: A platform for exchanging and improving data quality in cooperative information systems1. Information Systems, 29(7):551-582, Oct. 2004.
43. R. Wang. A product perspective on total data quality management. Communications of the ACM, 41(2):58-65, 1998.
44. R. Y. Wang and D. M. Strong. Beyond accuracy : What data quality means to data consumers. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(4):5-34, 1996.
45. A. J. Williams, V. Tkachenko, S. Golotvin, R. Kidd, and G. McCann. ChemSpider - building a foundation for the semantic web by hosting a crowd sourced databasing platform for chemistry. Journal of Cheminformatics, 2(Suppl 1):O16+, 2010.
46. J. Zhao. Guide to the Open Provenance Model Vocabulary. http://open-biomed.sourceforge.net/opmv/opmv-guide.html, 2010.
47. A. S. Zimmerman. New Knowledge from Old Data: The Role of Standards in the Sharing and Reuse of Ecological Data. Science, Technology & Human Values, 33(5):631-652, Sept. 2008.