Rectal cancer: Prognostic indicators of long-term outcome in patients considered for surgery

International Journal of Colorectal Disease

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 147-155

  Bown, E J ^a   Lloyd, G M ^b   Boyle, K M ^a   Miller, A S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF LEICESTER NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^b MOUNT VERNON CANCER CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Acquisition of data; Analysis and interpretation of data; Drafting the article; Prognosis; Prospective review; Rectal cancer; Surgery

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;

ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER PROGNOSIS; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER SURGERY; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; DISEASE SEVERITY; DISTANT METASTASIS; FEMALE; HARTMANN PROCEDURE; HUMAN; LONG TERM SURVIVAL; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; MIDDLE AGED; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; OVERALL SURVIVAL; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RECTUM ANTERIOR RESECTION; RECTUM CARCINOMA; RECTUM RESECTION; RECURRENCE FREE SURVIVAL; SIGMOIDOSCOPY; SURGEON; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HUMANS; LYMPH NODES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM METASTASIS; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROGNOSIS; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84893215593     PISSN: 01791958     EISSN: 14321262     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-013-1772-z     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. How P, Shihab O, Tekkis P, Brown G, Quirke P, Heald R, et al. (2011) A systematic review of cancer related patient outcomes after anterior resection and abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer in the total mesorectal excision era. Surg Oncol 20(4):e149-e155
2. West NP, Anderin C, Smith KJ, Holm T, Quirke P, European Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision Study Group (2010) Multicentre experience with extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 97(4):588-599
3. Sebag-Montefiore D, Stephens RJ, Steele R, Monson J, Grieve R, Khanna S, et al. (2009) Preoperative radiotherapy versus selective postoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer (MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG C016): a multicentre, randomised trial. Lancet 373(9666):811-820
4. Office for National Statistics. Interim life tables, 2008-2010. Available at: http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/publications/re-reference-tables.html?edition= tcm%3A77-223324. Accessed Sep 2011.
5. Tekkis PP, Heriot AG, Smith J, Thompson MR, Finan P, Stamatakis JD, et al. (2005) Comparison of circumferential margin involvement between restorative and nonrestorative resections for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 7(4):369-374
6. Wibe A, Syse A, Andersen E, Tretli S, Myrvold HE, Soreide O, et al. (2004) Oncological outcomes after total mesorectal excision for cure for cancer of the lower rectum: anterior vs. abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 47(1):48-58
7. Heald RJ, Moran BJ, Ryall RD, Sexton R, MacFarlane JK (1998) Rectal cancer: the Basingstoke experience of total mesorectal excision, 1978-1997. Arch Surg 133(8):894-899
8. den Dulk M, Putter H, Collette L, Marijnen CA, Folkesson J, Bosset JF, et al. (2009) The abdominoperineal resection itself is associated with an adverse outcome: the European experience based on a pooled analysis of five European randomised clinical trials on rectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 45(7):1175-1183
9. West NP, Finan PJ, Anderin C, Lindholm J, Holm T, Quirke P (2008) Evidence of the oncologic superiority of cylindrical abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 26(21):3517-3522
10. Nagtegaal ID, Marijnen CA, Kranenbarg EK, van de Velde CJ, van Krieken JH, Pathology Review Committee, et al. (2002) Circumferential margin involvement is still an important predictor of local recurrence in rectal carcinoma: not one millimeter but two millimeters is the limit. Am J Surg Pathol 26(3):350-357
11. Adam IJ, Mohamdee MO, Martin IG, Scott N, Finan PJ, Johnston D, et al. (1994) Role of circumferential margin involvement in the local recurrence of rectal cancer. Lancet 344(8924):707-711
12. Quirke P, Durdey P, Dixon MF, Williams NS (1986) Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection Histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision. Lancet 2(8514):996-999
13. Bernstein TE, Endreseth BH, Romundstad P, Wibe A, Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Group (2009) Circumferential resection margin as a prognostic factor in rectal cancer. Br J Surg 96(11):1348-1357