Factors affecting the postoperative progression of thoracic kyphosis in surgically treated adult patients with lumbar degenerative scoliosis

Spine

Volumn 39, Issue 8, 2014, Pages E521-E528

  Yagi, Mitsuru ^a   Hosogane, Naobumi ^b   Okada, Eijiro ^c   Watanabe, Kota ^b   Machida, Masafumi ^a   Tezuka, Masaki ^c   Matsumoto, Morio ^b   Asazuma, Takashi ^a  

^a NATIONAL HOSPITAL ORGANIZATION MURAYAMA MEDICAL CENTER   (Japan)

^b KEIO UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^c SAISEIKAI CENTRAL HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

Complication; Degenerative scoliosis; Sagittal alignment

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL OUTCOME; DEGENERATIVE DISEASE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; KYPHOSIS; LUMBAR SPINE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY (TOPIC); POSTERIOR SPINE FUSION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SCOLIOSIS; THORAX DISEASE; VERTEBRA BODY; AGE; AGED; BIOMECHANICS; BODY EQUILIBRIUM; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; DISEASE COURSE; JAPAN; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; RISK; SPINE FUSION; STATISTICAL MODEL; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERTEBRA;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; JAPAN; KYPHOSIS; LOGISTIC MODELS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; ODDS RATIO; POSTURAL BALANCE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SCOLIOSIS; SPINAL FUSION; THORACIC VERTEBRAE; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84893194356     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000226     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Glassman SD, Bridwell K, Dimar JR, et al. The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Spine 2005; 30: 2024-9.
2. Heary RF, Kumar S, Bono CM. Decision making in adult deformity. Neurosurgery 2008; 63: 69-77.
3. Bridwell KH, Glassman S, Horton W, et al. Does treatment (non-operative and operative) improve the two-year quality of life in patients with adult symptomatic lumbar scoliosis: a prospective multicenter evidence-based medicine study. Spine 2009; 34: 2171-8.
4. Good CR, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. Can posterior-only surgery provide similar radiographic and clinical results as combined anterior (thoracotomy/thoracoabdominal)/posterior approaches for adult scoliosis? Spine 2010; 35: 210-8.
5. Lowe T, Berven SH, Schwab FJ, et al. The SRS classification for adult spinal deformity: building on the King/Moe and Lenke clas-sification systems. Spine 2006; 31: S119-25.
6. Ploumis A, Liu H, Mehbod AA, et al. A correlation of radiographic and functional measurements in adult degenerative scoliosis. Spine 2009; 34: 1581-4.
7. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Is the T9, T11, or L1 the more reliable proximal level after adult lumbar or lumbosacral instrumented fusion to L5 or S1? Spine 2007; 32: 2653-61.
8. Lafage V, Schwab F, Patel A, et al. Pelvic tilt and truncal inclination: two key radiographic parameters in the setting of adults with spinal deformity. Spine 2009; 34: E599-606.
9. Rose PS, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Role of pelvic incidence, thoracic kyphosis, and patient factors on sagittal plane correction following pedicle subtraction osteotomy. Spine 2009; 34: 785-91.
10. Yagi M, Cunningham E, King A, et al. Long term clinical and radiographic outcomes of pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal imbalance: does level of proximal fusion affect the outcome?-minimum 5 years follow-up. Spine Deformity 2013; 1: 123-31.
11. DeWald CJ, Stanley T. Instrumentation-related complications of multilevel fusions for adult spinal deformity patients over age 65: surgical considerations and treatment options in patients with poor bone quality. Spine 2006; 31: S144-51.
12. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity after segmental posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion: minimum five-year follow-up. Spine 2008; 33: 2179-84.
13. Watanabe K, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. Proximal junctional vertebral fracture in adults after spinal deformity surgery using pedicle screw constructs: analysis of morphological features. Spine 2010; 35: 138-45.
14. Glattes RC, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity following long instrumented posterior spinal fusion: incidence, outcomes, and risk factor analysis. Spine 2005; 30: 1643-9.
15. Yang SH, Chen PQ. Proximal kyphosis after short posterior fusion for thoracolumbar scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003: 152-8.
16. Kostuik JP. Treatment of scoliosis in the adult thoracolumbar spine with special reference to fusion to the sacrum. Orthop Clin North Am 1988; 19: 371-81.
17. La Grone MO. Loss of lumbar lordosis. A complication of spinal fusion for scoliosis. Orthop Clin North Am 1988; 19: 383-93.
18. Mac Millan MM, Cooper R, Haid R. Lumbar and lumbosacral fusions using Cotrel-Dubousset pedicle screws and rods. Spine 1994; 19: 430-4.
19. Bridwell KH, Lewis SJ, Rinella A, et al. Pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the treatment of fixed sagittal imbalance. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86-A (suppl 1): 44-50.
20. Yagi M, King AB, Boachie-Adjei O. Incidence, risk factors, and natural course of proximal junctional kyphosis: surgical outcomes review of adult idiopathic scoliosis. Minimum 5 years of follow-up. Spine 2012; 37: 1479-89
21. Yagi M, King A, Boachie-Adjei O. Incidence, risk factors and classi-fication of proximal junctional kyphosis: surgical outcomes review of adult idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2011; 36: E60-8.
22. Kim HJ, Yagi M, Nyugen J, et al. Combined anterior-posterior surgery is the most important risk factor for developing proximal junctional kyphosis in idiopathic scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470: 1633-9.
23. Blondel B, Schwab F, Bess S, et al. Posterior global malalignment after osteotomy for sagittal plane deformity: it happens and here is why. Spine 2013; 38: E394-401.
24. Lafage V, Ames C, Schwab F, et al. Changes in thoracic kypho-sis negatively impact sagittal alignment after lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a comprehensive radiographic analysis. Spine 2012; 37: E180-7.
25. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Sagittal thoracic decompensation following long adult lumbar spinal instrumentation and fusion to L5 or S1: causes, prevalence, and risk factor analysis. Spine 2006; 31: 2359-66.
26. Gelb DE, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. An analysis of sagittal spinal alignment in 100 asymptomatic middle and older aged volunteers. Spine 1995; 20: 1351-8.
27. Schwab F, Lafage V, Farcy JP, et al. Age-related correlation with spinal parameters, pelvic parameters, and foot position. Spine 2006; 31: 1-9
28. Vedantam R, Lenke LG, Keeney JA, et al. Comparison of standing sagittal spinal alignment in asymptomatic adolescents and adults. Spine 1998; 23: 211-5.