Influence of MDPB-containing primer on streptococcus mutans biofilm formation in simulated class I restorations

Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 431-438

  Brambilla, Eugenio ^a   Ionescu, Andrei ^a   Fadini, Luigi ^a   Mazzoni, Annalisa ^b   Imazato, Satoshi ^c   Pashley, David ^d   Breschi, Lorenzo ^b,e   Gagliani, Massimo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TRIESTE   (Italy)

^c OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d MEDICAL COLLEGE OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^e CNR   (Italy)

Author keywords

Antibacterial agents; Biofilms; Dentin bonding agents; MDPB monomer; Streptococcus mutans

Indexed keywords

ANTICARIES AGENT; ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT; CLEARFIL PROTECT BOND; CLEARFIL SE BOND; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; FILTEK SUPREME PLUS; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; METHACRYLOYLOXYDECYL DIHYDROGEN PHOSPHATE; METHACRYLOYLOXYDODECYLPYRIDINIUM BROMIDE; PYRIDINIUM DERIVATIVE; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SCOTCHBOND MULTI PURPOSE; SCOTCHBOND MULTI-PURPOSE; SODIUM FLUORIDE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL LOAD; BIOFILM; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; DRUG EFFECT; ENAMEL; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROBIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION; MICROBIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SALIVA; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STREPTOCOCCUS MUTANS; SURFACE PROPERTY; DRUG EFFECTS;

ADULT; ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; BACTERIAL LOAD; BACTERIOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES; BIOFILMS; CARIOSTATIC AGENTS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; HUMANS; LIGHT-CURING OF DENTAL ADHESIVES; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; PYRIDINIUM COMPOUNDS; RESIN CEMENTS; SALIVA; SODIUM FLUORIDE; STREPTOCOCCUS MUTANS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 84893122160     PISSN: 14615185     EISSN: 17579988     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.a28734     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Aydin Sevinc B, Hanley L. Antibacterial activity of dental composites containing zinc oxide nanoparticles. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2010; 94: 22-31.
2. Bakhsh TA, Sadr A, Shimada Y, Tagami J, Sumi Y. Non-invasive quantification of resin-dentin interfacial gaps using optical coherence tomography: validation against confocal microscopy. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 915-925.
3. Bernardo M, Luis H, Martin MD, Leroux BG, Rue T, Leitão J, DeRouen TA. Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc 2007; 138: 775-783.
4. Beyth N, Bahir R, Matalon S, Domb AJ, Weiss EI. Streptococcus mutans biofilm changes surface-topography of resin composites. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 732-736.
5. Beyth N, Yudovin-Fearber I, Domb AJ, Weiss EI. Long-term antibacterial surface properties of composite resin incorporating polyethyleneimine nanoparticles. Quintessence Int 2010; 41: 827-835.
6. Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater 1997; 13: 258-269.
7. Brambilla E, Cagetti MG, Gagliani M, Fadini L, Garcia-Godoy F, Strohmenger L. Influence of different adhesive restorative materials on mutans streptococci colonization. Am J Dent 2005; 18: 173-176.
8. Brambilla E, Gagliani M, Ionescu A, Fadini L, Garcia-Godoy F. The influence of light-curing time on the bacterial colonization of resin composite surfaces. Dent Mater 2009; 25: 1067-1072.
9. Bürgers R, Cariaga T, Müller R, Rosentritt M, Reischl U, Handel G, Hahnel S. Effects of aging on surface properties and adhesion of Streptococcus mutans on various fissure sealants. Clin Oral Investig 2009; 13: 419-426.
10. Conover W. On some alternative procedures using ranks for the analysis of experimental designs. Commun Stat 1978; 5: 1349-1368.
11. da Silva BM, Franca FM, Florio FM, Basting RT. In situ anticariogenic effect of adhesive systems containing fluoride and MDPB. Am J Dent 2010; 23: 75-80.
12. de Carvalho FG, Puppin-Rontani RM, Soares LE, Santo AM, Martin AA, Nociti-Junior FH. Mineral distribution and CLSM analysis of secondary caries inhibition by fluoride/MDPB-containing adhesive system after cariogenic challenges. J Dent 2009; 37: 307-314.
13. Donlan RM, Costerton JW. Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin Microbiol Rev 2002; 15: 167-193.
14. Ebi N, Imazato S, Noiri Y, Ebisu S. Inhibitory effects of resin composite containing bactericide-immobilized filler on plaque accumulation. Dent Mater 2001; 17: 485-91.
15. Engelmann J, Leyhausen G, Leibfritz D, Geurtsen W. Metabolic effects of dental resin components in vitro detected by NMR spectroscopy. J Dent Res 2001; 80: 869-875.
16. Frencken JE, Imazato S, Toi C, Mulder J, Mickenautsch S, Takahashi Y, Ebisu S. Antibacterial effect of chlorhexidine- containing glass ionomer cement in vivo: a pilot study. Caries Res 2007; 41: 102-107.
17. Geurtsen W, Leyhausen G. Chemical-biological interactions of the resin monomer triethyleneglycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA). J Dent Res 2001; 80: 2046-2050.
18. Goeres DM, Hamilton MA, Beck NA, Buckingham-Meyer K, Hilyard JD, Loetterle LR, Lorenz LA, Walker DK, Stewart PS. A method for growing a biofilm under low shear at the air-liquid interface using the drip flow biofilm reactor. Nat Protoc 2009; 4: 783-788.
19. Nakajima M, Okuda M, Ogata M, Pereira PRN, Tagami J, Pashley DH. The durability of a fluoride-releasing resin adhesive system to dentin. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 186-192.
20. Goldstein GR. The longevity of direct and indirect posterior restorations is uncertain and may be affected by a number of dentist-, patient-, and material-related factors. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2010; 10: 30-31.
21. Gondim JO, Duque C, Hebling J, Giro EM. Influence of human dentine on the antibacterial activity of self-etching adhesive systems against cariogenic bacteria. J Dent 2008; 36: 241-248.
22. Guggenheim B, Giertsen E, Schupbach P, Shapiro S. Validation of an in vitro biofilm model of supragingival plaque. J Dent Res 2001; 80: 363-370.
23. Hahnel S, Leyer A, Rosentritt M, Burgers R, Handel G. Surface properties and in vitro Streptococcus Mutans adhesion to self-etching adhesives. J Adhes Dent 2009; 11: 263-269.
24. Hahnel S, Rosentritt M, Burgers R, Handel G. Adhesion of Streptococcus mutans NCTC 10449 to artificial teeth: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2008; 100: 309-315.
25. Hahnel S, Rosentritt M, Burgers R, Handel G. Surface properties and in vitro Streptococcus mutans adhesion to dental resin polymers. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2008; 19: 2619-2627.
26. Hannig C, Hannig M. The oral cavity - a key system to understand substratum-dependent bioadhesion on solid surfaces in man. Clin Oral Investig 2009; 13: 123-139.
27. Hansel C, Leyhausen G, Mai UE, Geurtsen W. Effects of various resin composite (co)monomers and extracts on two caries-associated microorganisms in vitro. J Dent Res 1998; 77: 60-67.
28. Hicks J, Garcia-Godoy F, Donly K, Flaitz C. Fluoride-releasing restorative materials and secondary caries. Dent Clin North Am 2002; 46: 247-276.
29. Huang M, Meng L, Fan M, Hu P, Bian Z. Effect of biofilm formation on virulence factor secretion via the general secretory pathway in Streptococcus mutans. Arch Oral Biol 2008; 53: 1179-1185.
30. Ikeda M, Matin K, Nikaido T, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Effect of surface characteristics on adherence of S. mutans biofilms to indirect resin composites. Dent Mater J 2007; 26: 915-923.
31. Imazato S. Antibacterial properties of resin composites and dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater 2003; 19: 449-457.
32. Imazato S, Ebi N, Takahashi Y, Kaneko T, Ebisu S, Russell RR. Antibacterial activity of bactericide-immobilized filler for resin-based restoratives. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 3605-3609.
33. Imazato S, Kaneko T, Takahashi Y, Noiri Y, Ebisu S. In vivo antibacterial effects of dentin primer incorporating MDPB. Oper Dent 2004; 29: 369-375.
34. Imazato S, Kinomoto Y, Tarumi H, Ebisu S, Tay FR. Antibacterial activity and bonding characteristics of an adhesive resin containing antibacterial monomer MDPB. Dent Mater 2003; 19: 313-319.
35. Imazato S, Kuramoto A, Takahashi Y, Ebisu S, Peters MC. In vitro antibacterial effects of the dentin primer of Clearfil Protect Bond. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 527-532.
36. Imazato S, McCabe JF. Influence of incorporation of antibacterial monomer on curing behavior of a dental composite. J Dent Res 1994; 73: 1641-1645.
37. Imazato S, Russell RR, McCabe JF. Antibacterial activity of MDPB polymer incorporated in dental resin. J Dent 1995; 23: 177-181.
38. Izutani N, Imazato S, Nakajo K, Takahashi N, Takahashi Y, Ebisu S, Russell RR. Effects of the antibacterial monomer 12-methacryloyloxydodecylpyridinium bromide (MDPB) on bacterial viability and metabolism. Eur J Oral Sci 2011; 119: 175-181.
39. Kantorski KZ, Scotti R, Valandro LF, Bottino MA, Koga-Ito CY, Jorge AO. Adherence of Streptococcus mutans to uncoated and saliva-coated glassceramics and composites. Gen Dent 2008; 56: 740-747.
40. Kantorski KZ, Scotti R, Valandro LF, Bottino MA, Koga-Ito CY, Jorge AO. Surface roughness and bacterial adherence to resin composites and ceramics. Oral Health Prev Dent 2009; 7: 29-32.
41. Kwon TY, Hong SH, Kim YK, Kim KH. Antibacterial effects of 4-META/ MMA-TBB resin containing chlorhexidine. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2010; 92: 561-567.
42. Li F, Chai ZG, Sun MN, Wang F, Ma S, Zhang L, Fang M, Chen JH. Antibiofilm effect of dental adhesive with cationic monomer. J Dent Res 2009; 88: 372-376.
43. Li F, Chen J, Chai Z, Zhang L, Xiao Y, Fang M, Ma S. Effects of a dental adhesive incorporating antibacterial monomer on the growth, adherence and membrane integrity of Streptococcus mutans. J Dent 2009; 37: 289-296.
44. Martins Junior W, De Rossi A, Samih Georges Abi Rached R, Rossi MA. A scanning electron microscopy study of diseased root surfaces conditioned with EDTA gel plus Cetavlon after scaling and root planing. J Electron Microsc (Tokyo) 2011; 60: 167-175.
45. Mo SS, Bao W, Lai GY, Wang J, Li MY. The microfloral analysis of secondary caries biofilm around Class I and Class II composite and amalgam fillings. BMC Infect Dis 2010; 10: 241.
46. Niu LN, Fang M, Jiao K, Tang LH, Xiao YH, Shen LJ, Chen JH. Tetrapodlike zinc oxide whisker enhancement of resin composite. J Dent Res 2010; 89: 746-750
47. Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Roeters JM, Loomans BA. Longevity and reasons for failure of sandwich and total-etch posterior composite resin restorations. J Adhes Dent 2007; 9: 469-475.
48. Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Roeters JM, Loomans BA. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 2-8.
49. Paradella TC, de Sousa FA, Koga-Ito CY, Jorge AO. Microbiological or chemical models of enamel secondary caries compared by polarizedlight microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2009; 90: 635-640.
50. Rathke A, Staude R, Muche R, Haller B. Antibacterial activity of a triclosan-containing resin composite matrix against three common oral bacteria. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2010; 21: 2971-2977.
51. Rolland SL, McCabe JF, Robinson C, Walls AW. In vitro biofilm formation on the surface of resin-based dentine adhesives. Eur J Oral Sci 2006; 114: 243-249.
52. Roumanas ED. The frequency of replacement of dental restorations may vary based on a number of variables, including type of material, size of the restoration, and caries risk of the patient. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2010; 10: 23-24.
53. Takahashi Y, Imazato S, Kaneshiro AV, Ebisu S, Frencken JE, Tay FR. Antibacterial effects and physical properties of glass-ionomer cements containing chlorhexidine for the ART approach. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 647-652.
54. Tezvergil-Mutluay A, Agee KA, Uchiyama T, Imazato S, Mutluay mm, Cadenaro M, Breschi L, Nishitani Y, Tay FR, Pashley DH. The inhibitory effects of quaternary ammonium methacrylates on soluble and matrixbound mmPs. J Dent Res 2011; 90: 535-540.
55. Thomas RZ, van der Mei HC, van der Veen MH, de Soet JJ, Huysmans MC. Bacterial composition and red fluorescence of plaque in relation to primary and secondary caries next to composite: an in situ study. Oral Microbiol Immunol 2008; 23: 7-13.
56. Thome T, Mayer MP, Imazato S, Geraldo-Martins VR, Marques mm. In vitro analysis of inhibitory effects of the antibacterial monomer MDPBcontaining restorations on the progression of secondary root caries. J Dent 2009; 37: 705-711.
57. van Dijken JW, Pallesen U. Clinical performance of a hybrid resin composite with and without an intermediate layer of flowable resin composite: a 7-year evaluation. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 150-156.
58. Xiao YH, Ma S, Chen JH, Chai ZG, Li F, Wang YJ. Antibacterial activity and bonding ability of an adhesive incorporating an antibacterial monomer DMAE-CB. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2009; 90: 813-817.
59. Yoshikawa K, Clark DT, Brailsford SR, Beighton D, Watson TF, Imazat S, Momoi Y. The effect of antibacterial monomer MDPB on the growth of organisms associated with root caries. Dent Mater J 2007; 26: 388-392.