Design of quorum quenching microbial vessel to enhance cell viability for biofouling control in membrane bioreactor

Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 97-105

  Cheong, Won Suk ^a   Kim, Sang Ryoung ^a   Oh, Hyun Suk ^a   Lee, Sang H ^a   Yeon, Kyung Min ^a   Lee, Chung Hak ^a   Lee, Jung Kee ^b  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^b PaiChai University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Biofouling; Ceramic microbial vessel; Inner flow feeding; Membrane bioreactor (MBR); Quorum quenching; Quorum sensing

Indexed keywords

N ACYLHOMOSERINE LACTONE;

ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; ARTICLE; BIOFOULING; CELL VIABILITY; CERAMIC MICROBIAL VESSEL; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; INNER FLOW FEEDING METHOD; MEMBRANE REACTOR; NONHUMAN; PSEUDOMONAS; QUORUM SENSING; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT;

ACYL-BUTYROLACTONES; BIOFOULING; BIOREACTORS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; MEMBRANES; MICROBIAL VIABILITY; PROTEOBACTERIA; QUORUM SENSING; WASTE WATER; WATER PURIFICATION;

EID: 84893122077     PISSN: 10177825     EISSN: 17388872     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4014/jmb.1311.11008     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Chang IS, Lee CH. 1998. Membrane filtration characteristics in membrane-coupled activated sludge system-the effect of physiological states of activated sludge on membrane fouling. Desalination 120: 221-233.
2. Cheong W-S, Lee C-H, Moon Y-H, Oh H-S, Kim S-R, Lee SH, et al. 2013. Isolation and identification of indigenous quorum quenching bacteria, Pseudomonas sp. 1A1, for biofouling control in MBR. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52: 10554-10560.
3. Drews A. 2010. Membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors-characterisation, contradictions, cause and cures. J. Membr. Sci. 363: 1-28.
4. DuBois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA, Smith F. 1956. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal. Chem. 28: 350-356.
5. Fuqua C, Winans SC. 1996. Conserved cis-acting promoter elements are required for density-dependent transcription of Agrobacterium tumefaciens conjugal transfer genes. J. Bacteriol. 178: 435-440.
6. Fuqua WC, Winans SC, Greenberg EP. 1994. Quorum sensing in bacteria-the luxr-luxi family of cell densityresponsive transcriptional regulators. J. Bacteriol. 176: 269-275.
7. Hammer BK, Bassler BL. 2003. Quorum sensing controls biofilm formation in Vibrio cholerae. Mol. Microbiol. 50: 101-104.
8. Hwang BK, Lee WN, Yeon KM, Park PK, Lee CH, Chang IS, et al. 2008. Correlating TMP increases with microbial characteristics in the bio-cake on the membrane surface in a membrane bioreactor. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42: 3963-3968.
9. Jahangir D, Oh HS, Kim SR, Park PK, Lee CH, Lee JK. 2012. Specific location of encapsulated quorum quenching bacteria for biofouling control in an external submerged membrane bioreactor. J. Membr. Sci. 411: 130-136.
10. Jiang W, Xia S, Liang J, Zhang Z, Hermanowicz SW. 2012. Effect of quorum quenching on the reactor performance, biofouling and biomass characteristics in membrane bioreactors. Water Res. 47: 187-196.
11. Judd S, Judd C. 2006. The MBR Book: Principles and Applications of Membrane Bioreactors in Water and Wastewater Treatment. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Boston.
12. Kawaguchi T, Chen YP, Norman RS, Decho AW. 2008. Rapid screening of quorum-sensing signal N-acyl homoserine lactones by an in vitro cell-free assay. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74: 3667-3671.
13. Kim H-W, Oh H-S, Kim S-R, Lee K-B, Yeon K-M, Lee C-H, et al. 2013. Microbial population dynamics and proteomics in membrane bioreactors with enzymatic quorum quenching. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 97: 4665-4675.
14. Kim JH, Choi DC, Yeon KM, Kim SR, Lee CH. 2011. Enzyme-immobilized nanofiltration membrane to mitigate biofouling based on quorum quenching. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45: 1601-1607.
15. Kim S, Lee S, Hong S, Oh Y, Kweon J, Kim T. 2009. Biofouling of reverse osmosis membranes: microbial quorum sensing and fouling propensity. Desalination 247: 303-315.
16. Kim SR, Oh HS, Jo SJ, Yeon KM, Lee CH, Lim DJ, et al. 2013. Biofouling control with bead-entrapped quorum quenching bacteria in membrane bioreactors: physical and biological effects. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47: 836-842.
17. Oh H-S, Kim S-R, Cheong W-S, Lee C-H, Lee J-K. 2013. Biofouling inhibition in MBR by Rhodococcus sp. BH4 isolated from real MBR plant. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 97: 10223-10231.
18. Oh HS, Yeon KM, Yang CS, Kim SR, Lee CH, Park SY, et al. 2012. Control of membrane biofouling in MBR for wastewater treatment by quorum quenching bacteria encapsulated in microporous membrane. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46: 4877-4884.
19. Parsek MR, Greenberg E. 2005. Sociomicrobiology: the connections between quorum sensing and biofilms. Trends Microbiol. 13: 27-33.
20. Ponnusamy K, Paul D, Kim YS, Kweon JH. 2010. 2(5H)-Furanone: a prospective strategy for biofouling-control in membrane biofilm bacteria by quorum sensing inhibition. Braz. J. Microbiol. 41: 227-234.
21. Xiong Y, Liu Y. 2010. Biological control of microbial attachment: a promising alternative for mitigating membrane biofouling. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 86: 825-837.
22. Yeon KM, Cheong WS, Oh HS, Lee WN, Hwang BK, Lee CH, et al. 2009. Quorum sensing: a new biofouling control paradigm in a membrane bioreactor for advanced wastewater treatment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43: 380-385.
23. Yeon KM, Kim J, Lee CH. 2009. Magnetic enzyme carrier for effective biofouling control in the membrane bioreactor based on enzymatic quorum quenching. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43: 7403-7409.