Reducing the impact of intrinsic dissipation in a superconducting circuit by quantum error detection

Nature Communications

Volumn 5, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Zhong, Y P ^a   Wang, Z L ^a   Martinis, J M ^b   Cleland, A N ^b   Korotkov, A N ^c   Wang, H ^a,d  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c University of California Riverside   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF CHINA   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

QUANTUM DOT;

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ERROR ANALYSIS; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; PROBABILITY; QUANTUM MECHANICS; SUPERCONDUCTIVITY;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ENERGY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTEGRATED CIRCUIT; MEASUREMENT ERROR; PROBABILITY; QUANTUM ERROR DETECTION; STORAGE; SUPERCONDUCTING CIRCUIT; SUPERCONDUCTOR; TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 84893110943     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4135     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. You, J. &Nori, F. Superconducting circuits and quantum information. Phys. Today 58, 42-47 (2005)
2. Clarke, J. &Wilhelm, F. K. Superconducting quantum bits. Nature 453, 1031-1042 (2008)
3. Devoret, M. H. &Schoelkopf, R. J. Superconducting circuits for quantum information: an outlook. Science 339, 1169-1174 (2013)
4. Sun, G. et al. Tunable quantum beam splitters for coherent manipulation of a solid-state tripartite qubit system. Nat. Commun. 1, 51 (2010)
5. Niskanen, A. O. et al. Quantum coherent tunable coupling of superconducting qubits. Science 316, 723-726 (2011)
6. Mariantoni, M. et al. Implementing the quantum von neumann architecture with superconducting circuits. Science 334, 61-65 (2011)
7. Abdumalikov, Jr A. A. et al. Experimental realization of non-Abelian non-adiabatic geometric gates. Nature 496, 482-485 (2013)
8. Paik, H. et al. Observation of high coherence in Josephson junction qubits measured in a three-dimensional circuit QED architecture. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 240501 (2011)
9. Rigetti, C. et al. Superconducting qubit in a waveguide cavity with a coherence time approaching 0.1 ms. Phys. Rev. B 86, 100506 (2012)
10. Barends, R. et al. Coherent Josephson qubit suitable for scalable quantum integrated circuits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 080502 (2013)
11. Bylander, J. et al. Noise spectroscopy through dynamical decoupling with a superconducting flux qubit. Nat. Phys. 7, 565-570 (2011)
12. Ristè, D., Bultink, C. C., Lehnert, K. W. &DiCarlo, L. Feedback control of a solid-state qubit using high-fidelity projective measurement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 240502 (2012)
13. Vijay, R. et al. Stabilizing Rabi oscillations in a superconducting qubit using quantum feedback. Nature 490, 77-80 (2012)
14. Reed, M. D. et al. Realization of three-qubit quantum error correction with superconducting circuits. Nature 482, 382-385 (2012)
15. Shor, P. W. Scheme for reducing decoherence in quantum computer memory. Phys. Rev. A 52, R2493-R2496 (1995)
16. Schindler, P. et al. Experimental repetitive quantum error correction. Science 332, 1059-1061 (2011)
17. Yao, X. C. et al. Experimental demonstration of topological error correction. Nature 482, 489-494 (2012)
18. Leung, D. W., Nielsen, M. A., Chuang, I. L. &Yamamoto, Y. Approximate quantum error correction can lead to better codes. Phys. Rev. A 56, 2567-2573 (1997)
19. Leghtas, Z. et al. Hardware-efficient autonomous quantum memory protection. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 120501 (2013)
20. Knill, E. Quantum computing with realistically noisy devices. Nature 434, 39-44 (2005)
21. Keane, K. &Korotkov, A. N. Simplified quantum error detection and correction for superconducting qubits. Phys. Rev. A 86, 012333 (2012)
22. Korotkov, A. N. &Keane, K. Decoherence suppression by quantum measurement reversal. Phys. Rev. A 81, 040103(R) (2010)
23. Katz, N. et al. Reversal of the weak measurement of a quantum state in a superconducting phase qubit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 200401 (2008)
24. Korotkov, A. N. &Jordan, A. N. Undoing a weak quantum measurement of a solid-state qubit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 166805 (2006)
25. Sun, Q., Al-Amri, M. &Zubairy, M. S. Reversing the weak measurement of an arbitrary field with finite photon number. Phys. Rev. A 80, 033838 (2009)
26. Kim, Y.-S., Lee, J.-C., Kwon, O. &Kim, Y.-H. Protecting entanglement from decoherence using weak measurement and quantum measurement reversal. Nat. Phys. 8, 117-120 (2012)
27. Lucero, E. et al. Computing prime factors with a Josephson phase qubit quantum processor. Nat. Phys. 8, 719-723 (2012)
28. Hofheinz, M. et al. Synthesizing arbitrary quantum states in a superconducting resonator. Nature 459, 546-549 (2009)
29. Wang, Z. L. et al. Quantum state characterization of a fast tunable superconducting resonator. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 163503 (2013)
30. Amri, M. A., Scully, M. O. &Zubairy, M. S. Reversing the weak measurement on a qubit. J. Phys. B 44, 165509 (2011)
31. Kiesel, N., Schmid, C., Weber, U., Ursin, R. &Weinfurter, H. Linear optics controlled-phase gate made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 210505 (2005)
32. Pedersen, L. H., Moller, N. M. &Molmer, K. Fidelity of quantum operations. Phys. Lett. A 367, 47-51 (2007).