Implementing the quantum von Neumann architecture with superconducting circuits

Science

Volumn 334, Issue 6052, 2011, Pages 61-65

  Mariantoni, Matteo ^a   Wang, H ^a,d   Yamamoto, T ^a,b   Neeley, M ^a,e   Bialczak, Radoslaw C ^a   Chen, Y ^a   Lenander, M ^a   Lucero, Erik ^a   O'Connell, A D ^a   Sank, D ^a   Weides, M ^a,f   Wenner, J ^a   Yin, Y ^a   Zhao, J ^a   Korotkov, A N ^c   Cleland, A N ^a   Martinis, John M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b NEC CORPORATION   (Japan)

^c University of California Riverside   (United States)

^d ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^e MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^f NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

QUANTUM DOT;

ALGORITHM; COMPUTER; DATABASE; ERROR CORRECTION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; QUANTUM MECHANICS; SUPERCONDUCTIVITY;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER; COMPUTER MEMORY; FOURIER TRANSFORMATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTUM MECHANICS; SUPERCONDUCTOR; VON NEUMANN ARCHITECTURE;

EID: 80053582347     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1208517     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. D. P. DiVincenzo, Fortschr. Phys. 48, 771 (2000).
2. M. A. Nielsen, I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2000).
3. N. D. Mermin, Quantum Computer Science: An Introduction (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2007).
4. H. M. Wiseman, G. J. Milburn, Quantum Measurement and Control (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2010).
5. L. M. K. Vandersypen et al., Nature 414, 883 (2001).
6. D. G. Cory et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2152 (1998).
7. Y. S. Weinstein, M. A. Pravia, E. M. Fortunato, S. Lloyd, D. G. Cory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1889 (2001).
8. R. Blatt, D. Wineland, Nature 453, 1008 (2008).
9. J. Chiaverini et al., Science 308, 997 (2005).
10. T. Monz et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 040501 (2009).
11. D. J. Reilly et al., Science 321, 817 (2008).
12. B. P. Lanyon et al., Nat. Phys. 5, 134 (2009).
13. K. S. Choi, H. Deng, J. Laurat, H. J. Kimble, Nature 452, 67 (2008).
14. J. Clarke, F. K. Wilhelm, Nature 453, 1031 (2008).
15. J. H. Plantenberg, P. C. De Groot, C. J. P. M. Harmans, J. E. Mooij, Nature 447, 836 (2007).
16. L. DiCarlo et al., Nature 460, 240 (2009).
17. P. J. Leek et al., Phys. Rev. B 79, 180511R (2009).
18. T. Yamamoto et al., Phys. Rev. B 82, 184515 (2010).
19. M. Neeley et al., Nature 467, 570 (2010).
20. L. Dicarlo et al., Nature 467, 574 (2010).
21. M. Mariantoni et al., Nat. Phys. 7, 287 (2011).
22. H. Wang et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 060401 (2011).
23. M. D. Reed et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 203110 (2010).
24. R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, K. Horodecki, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 865 (2009).
25. F. W. Strauch et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 167005 (2003).
26. Materials and methods are available as supporting material on Science Online.
27. A. Barenco et al., Phys. Rev. A 52, 3457 (1995).
28. A full gate characterization by quantum process tomography was not possible because we could only simultaneously measure two qubits, with the resonator acting as the third qubit.
29. T. C. Ralph, K. J. Resch, A. Gilchrist, Phys. Rev. A 75, 022313 (2007).