Improving the transparency and trustworthiness of subspecialty-based clinical practice guidelines

Mayo Clinic Proceedings

Volumn 89, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 5-7

  Talwalkar, Jayant A ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; QUALITY CONTROL; REVIEW; SCORING SYSTEM; STANDARD; TRANSPARENCY; TRUSTWORTHINESS;

EID: 84893090666     PISSN: 00256196     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.11.008     Document Type: Editorial

References (9)

1. Feuerstein JD, Akbari M, Gifford AE, et al. Systematic analysis underlying the quality of the scientific evidence and conflicts of interest in interventional medicine subspecialty guidelines. Mayo Clin Proc. 2014;89(1):16-24.
2. Institute of Medicine. Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2011. http://iom.edu/Reports/2011/Clinical-Practice- Guidelines-We-Can-Trust.aspx. Accessed November 2, 2013.
3. Tricoci P, Allen JM, Kramer JM, Califf RM, Smith SC Jr. Scientific evidence underlying the ACC/AHA clinical practice guidelines [published correction appears in JAMA. 2009;301(15):1544]. JAMA. 2009;301(8):831-841.
4. Koh C, Zhao X, Samala N, Sakiani S, Liang TJ, Talwalkar JA. AASLD clinical practice guidelines: a critical review of scientific evidence and evolving recommendations [published online ahead of print June 14, 2013]. Hepatology. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1002/hep.26578.
5. Murad MH, Montori VM. Synthesizing evidence: shifting the focus from individual studies to the body of evidence. JAMA. 2013;309(21):2217-2218.
6. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al; GRADE Working Group. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336(7650): 924-926.
7. Cosgrove L, Bursztajn HJ, Erlich DR, Wheeler EE, Shaughnessy AF. Conflicts of interest and the quality of recommendations in clinical guidelines. J Eval Clin Pract. 2013;19(4): 674-681.
8. Lenzer J, Hoffman JR, Furberg CD, Ioannidis JP; Guideline Panel Review Working Group. Ensuring the integrity of clinical practice guidelines: a tool for protecting patients. BMJ. 2013;347: f5535.
9. Montori VM, Brito JP, Murad MH. The optimal practice of evidence-based medicine: incorporating patient preferences in practice guidelines [published online ahead of print October 28, 2013]. JAMA. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama. 2013.281422.