Meaning and belief in constitutional interpretation

Fordham Law Review

Volumn 82, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 577-596

  Marmor, Andrei ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84893074199     PISSN: 0015704X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. See, e.g., Andrei Marmor, Textualism in Context (Univ. of S. Cal. Gould Sch. of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series, Paper No. 12-13, 2012), available at http://papers.ssrn. com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract-id=2112384.
2. See Antonin Scalia, A Matter of Interpretation 119 (1997);
3. see also Ronald Dworkin, Freedom's Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution (1996).
4. John Perry, Textualism and the Discovery of Rights, in Philosophical Foundations of Language in the Law 105, 106 (Andrei Marmor & Scott Soames eds., 2011).
5. See John Rawls, A Theory of Justice (rev. ed. 1999).
6. See Andrei Marmor, Farewell to Conceptual Analysis (in Jurisprudence), in Philosophical Foundations of the Nature of Law 407 (Wil Waluchow & Stefan Sciaraffaeds., 2013).
7. See Hilary Putnam, Mind, Language and Reality 215-71 (1979).
8. See Saul Kripke, Naming and Necessity (1972).
9. See Scott Soames, Knowledge of Manifest Natural Kinds, in 2 PHILOSOPHICAL Essays: The Philosophical Significance of Language 189 (2009).
10. See RONALD DWORKIN, JUSTICE IN ROBES 154-56 (2006);
11. see also David Brink, Legal Theory, Legal Interpretation, and Judicial Review, 17 Phil. & Pub. Aff. 105 (1988).
12. Brink is a realist about moral terms, while Dworkin is not. See Ronald Dworkin, Objectivity and Truth: You 'd Better Believe It, 25 Phil. & PUB. Aff. 87 (1996).
13. Nix v. Hedden, 149 U. S. 304 (1893).
14. See Andrei Marmor, Interpretation and Legal Theory 141 (rev. 2d ed. 2005) (elaborating on this critique in greater detail).
15. W. B. Gallie, Essentially Contested Concepts, 56 Proc. Aristotelian Soc'y 167 (1956).
16. Andrei Marmor, Varieties of Vagueness in the Law (Univ. of S. Cal. Gould Sen. of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series, Paper No. 12-8, 2013), available at http://papers.ssm.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract-id=2039076.