Lay understanding of probability distributions

Judgment and Decision Making

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 1-14

  Goldstein, Daniel G ^a   Rothschild, David ^a  

^a MICROSOFT RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Biases; Distribution; Expectation; Frequencies; Graphical interface; Polling; Probability

Indexed keywords

EID: 84893053239     PISSN: 19302975     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Deese, J. R., & Kaufman, A. (1957). Serial effects in recall of unorganized and sequentially organized verbal material. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 180-187.
2. Delavande, A., & Rohwedder S. (2008). Eliciting subjective probabilities in Internet surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 866-891.
3. Gigerenzer, G. (2011). What are natural frequencies? Doctors need to find better ways to communicate risk to patients. BMJ, 343:d6386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d6386.
4. Gigerenzer, G., & Murray, D. J. (1987). Cognition as intuitive statistics. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Goldstein, D. G., Johnson, E. J., & Sharpe, W. F. (2008). Choosing outcomes versus choosing products: Consumer-focused retirement investment advice. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 440-456.
6. Haran, U., Moore D. A., & Morewedge, C. K. (2010). A simple remedy for overprecision in judgment. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 467-476.
7. Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1984). Automatic processing of fundamental information: the case of frequency of occurrence. The American Psychologist, 39, 1372-1388.
8. Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1979). Automatic and effortful processes in memory, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 56-388.
9. Hau, R., Pleskac, T. J., & Hertwig, R. (2010). Decisions from experience and statistical probabilities: Why they trigger different choices than a priori probabilities. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 23, 48-68.
10. Hertwig, R., Barron, G., Weber, E. U., & Erev, I. (2004). Decisions from experience and the effect of rare events in risky choice. Psychological Science, 15, 534-539.
11. Hoffrage, U., Lindsey, S., Hertwig, R., & Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Communicating statistical information. Science, 290, 2261-2262.
12. Hogarth, R. M., & Einhorn, H. J. (1992). Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 1-55.
13. Hogarth, R. M., & Soyer, E. (2011). Sequentially simulated outcomes: Kind experience vs. non-transparent description. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 434-463.
14. Ibrekk, H., Morgan, M. G. (1987). Graphical communication of uncertain quantities to nontechnical people. Risk Analysis, 7, 519-529.
15. Jenkinson, D. J. (2005). The elicitation of probabilities-a review of the statistical literature. BEEP working paper, University of Sheffield, UK.
16. Kahneman, D., Fredrickson, B. L., Schreiber, C. A., & Redelmeier, D. A. (1993). When more pain is preferred to less: Adding a better end. Psychological Science, 4, 401-405.
17. Kabus, I. (1976). You can bank on uncertainty, Harvard Business Review, May-June, 95-105.
18. Kaufmann, C., Weber, M., & Haisley, E.C. (2013). The role of experience sampling and graphical displays on one's investment risk appetite, Management Science, 59, 323-340.
19. Laplace, P.-S. (1951). A philosophical essay on probabilities (F.W. Truscott & F.L. Emory, Trans.). New York: Dover. (Original work published 1814).
20. Lau, H., Lau, A., & Ho, C. (1998). Improved moment-estimation formulas using more than three subjective fractiles. Management Science, 44, 346-351.
21. Lichtenstein, S., Fischhoff, B., & Phillips, L. D. (1982). In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic and A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Lindskog, M., Winman, A., & Juslin, P. (2013). Naïve point estimation. Journal of experimental psychology: learning, memory, and cognition, 39, 782.
23. Mason, W., & Suri, S. (2012). Conducting behavioral research on Amazon's Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 1-23.
24. O'Hagan, A, Buck, C. E., Daneshkhah, A., Eiser, J. R., Garthwaite, P. H., Jenkinson, D. J., Oakley, J. E., & Rakow, T. (2006). Uncertain Judgments: Eliciting Experts' Probabilities. New York: Wiley.
25. Peterson, C. R., & Beach, L. R. (1967). Man as intuitive statistician. Psychological Bulletin, 68, 29-46.
26. Sharpe, W., Goldstein, D. G., & Blythe, P. (2000). The distribution builder: A tool for inferring investor preferences. Available online at: http://www.stanford.edu/wfsharpe/art/qpaper/qpaper.pdf.
27. Staël von Holstein, C.-A. S. (1971). Two techniques for assessment of subjective probability distributions - An experimental study. Acta Psychologica, 35, 478-494.
28. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1130.
29. Wallsten, T. S., & Budescu, D. V. (1983). Encoding subjective probabilities: A psychological and psychometric review. Management Science, 29, 151-173.
30. Winkler, R. L. (1967). The assessment of prior distributions in Bayesian analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association 62, 776-800.
31. Van Lenthe, J. (1993a). A blueprint of ELI: A new methods for eliciting subjective probability distributions. Behavior Research Methods Instruments & Computers, 25, 425-433.
32. Van Lenthe, J. (1993b). ELI: An interactive elicitation technique for subjective probability distributions. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 55, 379-413.
33. Van Noortwijk, J. M., Dekker, A., Cooke, R. M., & Mazzuchi, T. A. (1992). Expert judgment in maintenance optimization. Reliability, IEEE Transactions on, 41, 427-432.