Illuminating activities at Paleo Crossing (33ME274) through microwear analysis

Lithic Technology

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 97-108

  Logan Miller, G ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Clovis; Microwear; Paleoindian

Indexed keywords

EID: 84893026608     PISSN: 01977261     EISSN: 20516185     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1179/0197726113Z.00000000012     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Bamforth, Douglas 1988 Investigating Microwear Polishes with Blind Tests: The Institute Results in Context. Journal of Archaeological Science15: 11-23.
2. Bamforth, Douglas, George Burns, and Craig Woodman 1990 Ambiguous Use Traces and Blind Test Results: New Data. Journal of Archaeological Science 17: 413-430.
3. Brose, David S. 1994 Archaeological Investigations at the Paleo Crossing Site: a Paleoindian Occupation in Medina County, Ohio. In The First Discovery of America, edited by William S. Dancey, pp. 61-76. The Ohio Archaeological Council, Columbus.
4. Brush, Nigel, and Richard W. Yerkes 1996 Microwear Analysis of Chipped Stone Tools from the Martins Creek Mastodon Site, Holmes County, Ohio. Current Research in the Pleistocene 13: 55-57.
5. Bryan, A.L. 1991 The Fluted-Point Tradition in the Americas-One of Several Adaptations to Late Pleistocene American Environments. In Clovis: Origins and Adaptations, edited by R. Bonnichsen and K.L. Tunmire, pp. 15-33. Center for the Study of the First Americans, Corvallis, Oregon.
6. Collins, Michael 1999 Clovis Blade Technology: A Comparative Study of the Keven Davis Cache, Texas. University of Texas Press, Austin.
7. Dinnis, R., A. Pawlick, and C. Gaillard 2009 Bladelet Cores as Weapon Tips? Hafting Residue Identification and Microwear of Three Carinated Burins from the Late Aurignacian of Les Vachons, France. Journal of Archaeological Science 39: 1922-1934.
8. Ellis, Christopher, Jon Tomenchuk, and John D. Holland 2003 Typology, Use, and Sourcing of the Late Pleistocene Lithic Artifacts from the Hiscock Site. In The Hiscock Site: Late Pleistocene and Holocene Paleoecology and Archaeology of Western New York State, edited by Richard S. Laub, pp. 221-237. Buffalo Society of Natural Sciences, Buffalo.
9. Eren, Metin I. 2006 The Paleo Crossing (33-ME-274) Non-Projectile Point Biface Assemblage. Current Research in the Pleistocene 23: 95-97.
10. Eren, Metin I. 2010 Anvil Reduction at the Early Paleoindian Site of Paleo Crossing (33ME274), Northeast Ohio. Current Research in the Pleistocene 27: 75-77.
11. Eren, Metin I., and Brian Redmond 2011 Clovis Blades at Paleo Crossing (33ME274), Medina County, Ohio. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 36: 173-194.
12. Eren, Metin I., Brian Redmond, and Mark Kollecker 2004 The Paleo Crossing (33-ME-274) Fluted Point Assemblage. Current Research in the Pleistocene 21: 38-39.
13. Eren, Metin I., Brian Redmond, and Mark Kollecker 2005 Unifacial Stone Tool Analyses from the Paleo Crossing Site (33-ME-274), Ohio. Current Research in the Pleistocene 22: 43-45.
14. Eren, Metin I., Anne Chao, Wen-Han Hwang, and Robert K. Colwell 2012 Estimating the Richness of a Population when the Maximum Number of Classes is Fixed: a Non-Parametric Solution to an Archaeological Problem. PLoS ONE 7(5): e34179. doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0034179.
15. Gero, Joan 1995 Railroading Epistemology: Paleoindians and Women. In Interpreting Archaeology, edited by Ian Hodder, pp. 175-180. Routledge, New York.
16. van Gijn, Anne Louise 1990 The Wear and Tear of Flint: Principles of Microwear Analysis Applied to Dutch Neolithic Assemblages. Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia 22, University of Leiden, Leiden, The Netherlands.
17. Haynes, Gary 2002 The Early Settlement of North America. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
18. Juel Jensen, Helle 1988 Functional Analysis of Prehistoric Flint Tools by High-Power Microscopy: A Review of the West European Research. Journal of World Prehistory 2: 53-88.
19. Kay, Marvin 1996 Microwear Analysis of Some Clovis and Experimental Chipped Stone Tools. In Stone Tools: Theoretical Insights into Human Prehistory, edited by George H. Odell, pp. 315-344. Plenum, New York.
20. Kay, Marvin 1999 Microscopic Attributes of the Keven Davis Blades. In Clovis Blade Technology, edited by Michael Collins, pp. 126-144. University of Texas Press, Austin.
21. Keeley, Lawrence H. 1980 Experimental Determination of Stone Tool Use. A Micro-Wear Analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
22. Kelly, Robert 1995 The Foraging Spectrum: Diversity in Hunter-Gatherer Lifeways. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington.
23. Kelly, Robert, and Lawrence Todd 1988 Coming into the Country: Early Paleoindian Hunting and Mobility. American Antiquity 53: 231-244.
24. Longo, Laura, and Natalia Skakun 2008 "Prehistoric Technology" 40 Years Later: Functional Studies and the Russian Legacy. BAR International Series S1783, Oxbow, Oxford.
25. Martin, Paul S. 1984 Prehistoric Overkill: The Global Model. In Quaternary Extinctions, edited by P.S. Martin and R.G. Klein, pp. 354-403. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.
26. Minchak, Scott A., William A. Dickens, Charlotte D. Pevny, and Michael R. Waters 2011 Usewear Analysis of Clovis Artifacts. In Clovis Technology at the Gault Site in Texas, edited by Michael R. Waters, Charlotte D. Pevny, and David L. Carlson, pp. 135-151. Texas A&M University Press, College Station.
27. Meltzer, David 1993 Is There a Clovis Adaptation? In From Kostenki to Clovis: Upper Paleolithic Paleoindian Adaptations, edited by O. Soffer and N.D. Praslov, pp. 293-310. Plenum Press, NewYork.
28. Miller, G. Logan 2010 Ohio Hopewell Ceremonial Bladelet Use at the Moorehead Circle, Fort Ancient. Unpublished Masters Thesis, Department of Anthropology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
29. Morgan, Brooke M., Metin I. Eren, Nada Khreisheh, Genevieve Hill, and Bruce Bradley In Press. Clovis Bipolar Lithic Reduction at Paleo Crossing, Ohio: a Reinterpretation Based on the Examination of Experimental Replications. In Clovis: Current Perspectives on Technology, Chronology, and Adaptations, edited by Thomas Jennings and Ashley Smallwood. Texas A&M Press, College Station, Texas.
30. Morrow, Juliet 1996 The Organization of Paleoindian Lithic Technology in the Confluence Area of the Mississippi, Illinois, and Missouri Rivers. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Washington University, St. Louis.
31. Rots, Veerle 2010 Prehension and Hafting Traces on Flint Tools: A Methodology. Leuven University Press, Leuven, Belgium.
32. Seeman, Mark, Nils Nilsson, Garry Summers, Larry Morris, Paul Barans, Elaine Dowd, and Margaret Newman 2008 Evaluating Protein Residues on Gainey Phase Paleoindian Stone Tools. Journal of Archaeological Science 35: 2742-2750.
33. Semenov, Sergei 1964 Prehistoric Technology. Translated by M.W. Thompson. Barnes and Noble, New York.
34. Shoberg, Marilyn 2010 Functional Analysis of Stone Tools. In Clovis Technology, edited by Bruce Bradley, Michael Collins and Andrew Hemmings, pp. 138-156. Archaeology Series 17. International Monographs in Prehistory, Ann Arbor.
35. Shott, Michael J. 1993 The Leavitt Site: A Parkhill Phase Paleo-Indian Occupation in Central Michigan. Memoirs of the University of Michigan Museum of Anthropology, No. 25, Ann Arbor.
36. Simons, Donald B. 1997 The Gainey and Butler Sites as Focal Points for Caribou and People. In Caribou and Reindeer Hunters of the Northern Hemisphere, edited by L. Jackson and P. Thacker, pp. 105-131. Avebury, Aldershot.
37. Stork, Peter L., and John Tomenchuk 1990 An Early Paleoindian Cache of Informal Tools at the Udora Site, Ontario. Research in Economic Anthropology 5: 45-93.
38. Tankersley, Kenneth B. 1998 Variation in the Early Paleoindian Economies of Late Pleistocene Eastern North America. American Antiquity 63: 7-20.
39. Tankersley, Kenneth B., and J.D. Holland 1994 Lithic Procurement Patterns at the Paleo Crossing Site, Medina County, Ohio. Current Research in the Pleistocene 11: 61-63.
40. Tomenchuk, Jon 1997 A Parametric Use-Wear Study of Artifacts from Areas C and C-east. In The Fisher Site: Archaeological, Geological and Paleobotanical Studies at an Early Paleo-Indian Site in Southern Ontario, Canada, edited by Peter L. Stork, pp. 95-162. Memoirs of the Museum of Anthropoloy, University of Michigan, No. 30, Ann Arbor.
41. Tomenchuk, Jon, and Peter Stork 1997 Two Newly Recognized Paleoindian Tool Types: Single-and Double-Scribe Compass Gravers and Coring Gravers. American Antiquity 62: 508-522.
42. Vaughan, Patrick 1985 Use-Wear Analysis of Flaked Stone Tools. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
43. Waguespack, Nicole, and Todd Surovell 2003 Clovis Hunting Strategies, or How to Make Out on Plentiful Resources. American Antiquity 68: 333-352.
44. Yerkes, Richard W. 1983 Microwear, Microdrills, and Mississippian Craft Specialization. American Antiquity 48: 499-518.
45. Yerkes, Richard W. 1990 Using Microwear Analysis to Investigate Domestic Activities and Craft Specialization at the Murphy Site, a Small Hopewell Settlement in Licking County, Ohio. In The Interpretive Possibilities of Microwear Analysis, edited by B. Gräslund, H. Knutson, K. Knutson and J. Taffinder, pp. 167-176. Societas Archaeologica Upsaliensis, Aun 14, Uppsala, Sweeden.
46. Yerkes, Richard W., and P. Nick Kardulias 1993 Recent Developments in the Analysis of Lithic Artifacts. Journal of Archaeological Research 1: 89-119.