Steady-state visual-evoked response to upright and inverted geometrical faces: A magnetoencephalography study

Neuroscience Letters

Volumn 562, Issue , 2014, Pages 19-23

  Tsuruhara, Aki ^a   Inui, Koji ^a,b   Kakigi, Ryusuke ^a,b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PHYSIOLOGICAL SCIENCES   (Japan)

^b GRADUATE UNIVERSITY FOR ADVANCED STUDIES   (Japan)

Author keywords

Face; Inversion effect; Magnetoencephalography; Steady state visual evoked response

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SPECTROSCOPY; STEADY STATE;

FACE; INVERSION EFFECT; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; STEADY-STATE VISUAL-EVOKED RESPONSE;

ADULT; BRAIN; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME;

EID: 84892983093     PISSN: 03043940     EISSN: 18727972     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2014.01.001     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bentin S., Allison T., Puce A., Perez E., McCarthy G. Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 1996, 8:551-565.
2. Eimer M. Effects of face inversion on the structural encoding and recognition of faces. Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 2000, 10:145-158.
3. George N., Evans J., Fiori N., Davidoff J., Renault B. Brain events related to normal and moderately scrambled faces. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 1996, 4:65-76.
4. Itier R.J., Taylor M.J. N170 or N1? Spatiotemporal differences between object and face processing using ERPs. Cereb. Cortex. 2004, 14:132-142.
5. Linkenkaer-Hansen K., Palva J.M., Sams M., Hietanen J.K., Aronen H.J., Ilmoniemi R.J. Face-selective processing in human extrastriate cortex around 120ms after stimulus onset revealed by magneto- and electroencephalography. Neurosci. Lett. 1998, 253:147-150.
6. Rossion B., Delvenne J.F., Debatisse D., Goffaux V., Bruyer R., Crommelinck M., Guérit J.M. Spatio-temporal localization of the face inversion effect: an event-related potentials study. Biol. Psychol. 1999, 50:173-189.
7. Rossion B., Gauthier I., Tarr M.J., Despland P., Bruyer R., Linotte S., Crommelinck M. The N170 occipito-temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: an electrophysiological account of face-specic processes in the human brain. Neuroreport 2000, 11:69-74.
8. Tomalski P., Johnson M.H. Cortical sensitivity to contrast polarity and orientation of faces is modulated by temporal-nasal hemifield asymmetry. Brain Imaging Behav. 2012, 6:88-101.
9. Watanabe S., Kakigi R., Puce A. The spatiotemporal dynamics of the face inversion effect: A magneto- and electro-encephalographic study. Neuroscience 2003, 116:879-895.
10. Liu J., Higuchi M., Marantz a, Kanwisher N. The selectivity of the occipitotemporal M170 for faces. Neuroreport 2000, 11:337-341.
11. D. Regan, Some characteristics of average steady-state and transient responses evoked by modulated light, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 20 (1966) 238-248.
12. Rossion B., Prieto E.A., Boremanse A., Kuefner D., Van Belle G. A steady-state visual evoked potential approach to individual face perception: Effect of inversion, contrast-reversal and temporal dynamics. NeuroImage 2012, 63:1585-1600.
13. Rossion B., Boremanse A. Robust sensitivity to facial identity in the right human occipito-temporal cortex as revealed by steady-state visual-evoked potentials. J. Vis. 2011, 11:1-21.
14. L.F. Gruss, M.J. Wieser, S.R. Schweinberger, A. Keil, Face-evoked steady-state visual potentials: effects of presentation rate and face inversion, Front. Hum. Neurosci. 6 (2012) 316 1-10.
15. Y. Chen, A.K. Seth, J.A. Gally, G.M. Edelman, The power of human brain magnetoencephalographic signals can be modulated up or down by changes in an attentive visual task., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100 (2003) 3501-3506.
16. Cottereau B., Lorenceau J., Gramfort A., Clerc M., Thirion B., Baillet S. Phase delays within visual cortex shape the response to steady-state visual stimulation. NeuroImage 2011, 54:1919-1929.
17. E. Alonso-Prieto, G. Van Belle, J. Liu-Shuang, A.M., Norcia, B. Rossion, The 6Hz fundamental stimulation frequency rate for individual face discrimination in the right occipito-temporal cortex, Neuropsychologia (2013) 1-13.
18. Srinivasan R., Russell D.P., Edelman G.M., Tononi G. Increased synchronization of neuromagnetic responses during conscious perception. J. Neurosci. 1999, 19:5435-5448.