The need to consider time, level, and trends: A turnover perspective

Journal of Organizational Behavior

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 296-300

  Mitchell, Terence R ^a   Burch, Tyler C ^a   Lee, Thomas W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Level; Time; Trajectories; Trends; Turnover

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892982941     PISSN: 08943796     EISSN: 10991379     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/job.1898     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Ariely, D., & Carmon, Z. (2003). Summary assessments of experiences: The whole is different from the sum of its parts. In G. Loewenstein, D. Read, & R. Baumeister (Eds.), Time and decision: Economic and psychological perspectives on intertemporal choice (323-349). New York, NY: Sage.
2. Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 234-246.
3. Felps, W., Mitchell, T. R., Hekman, D., Lee, T. W., Holtom, B. C., & Harman, W. S. (2009). Turnover contagion: How coworkers' job embeddedness and coworkers' job search behaviors influence quitting. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 545-561.
4. Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007). What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1199-1228.
5. Holtom, B. H., Mitchell, T. R., Lee, T. W., & Bussmann, M. (2008). Turnover and retention research: A glance at the past, a closer review of the present, and a venture into the future. Academy of Management Annals, 2, 231-274.
6. Holtom, B. C., Tidd, S. T., Mitchell, T. R., & Lee, T. W. (forthcoming). A demonstration of the importance of temporal considerations in the prediction of newcomer turnover. Human Relations.
7. Hulin, C. L. (1991). Adaptation, persistence and commitment in organizations. In M. Dunnette, & L. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, 2nd edn. (445-507). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
8. Klein, K. J., Dansereau, F., & Hall, R. J. (1994). Levels issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 19, 105-229.
9. Lee, T. W., & Mitchell, T. R. (1994). An alternative approach: The unfolding model of voluntary employee turnover. The Academy of Management Review, 19(1), 51-89.
10. Lee, T. W., Mitchell, T. R., Holtom, B. C., McDaniel, L., Hill, J. W. (1999). A quantitative test of the unfolding model of voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 450-462.
11. Lee, T. W., Mitchell, T. R., Weiss, L., & Fireman, S. (1996). An empirical examination of the unfolding model of voluntary employee turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 5-36.
12. Liu, D., Mitchell, T. R., Lee, T. W., Holtom, B. C., & Hinkin, T. R. (2012). When employees are out of step with coworkers: How job satisfaction trajectory and dispersion influence individual- and unit-level voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 55(6), 1360-1380.
13. Morgeson, F. P., & Hofmann, D. A. (1999). The structure and function of collective constructs: Implications for multilevel research and theory development. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 249-265.
14. Muchinsky, P. M. (1996). The Incubator. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 3-4.
15. Shelley, M. K. (1994). Gain/loss asymmetry in risky intertemporal choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 59, 124-159.
16. Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110(3), 403-421.
17. Wright, T. A. (1997). Time revisited in organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 201-204.