The Internet in face-to-face higher education: Can interactive learning improve academic achievement?

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 149-159

  Castaño Muñoz, Jonatan ^a   Duart, Josep M ^a   Sancho Vinuesa, Teresa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT OBERTA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENTS; BLENDED LEARNING; DATA SET; FACE-TO-FACE LEARNING; HIGHER EDUCATION; INTERACTIVE LEARNING; RECENT RESEARCHES; TIME SPENT;

E-LEARNING; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84892938482     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12007     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Allen, I. E., &, Seaman, J., (2010). Class differences: online education in the United States, 2010. The Sloan Consortium. Retrieved November 28, 2012, from http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/survey/pdf/class- differences.pdf
2. Angrist, J., &, Lavy, V. C., (2002). New evidence on classroom computers and pupil learning. The Economic Journal, 112, 735-765.
3. Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., et al (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74, 3, 379-439. doi: 10.3102/00346543074003379.
4. Caliendo, M., Kopeinig, S., Caliendo, M., &, Kopeinig, S., (2005). Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. IZA Discussion Paper, 1588. Retrieved November 28, 2012, from ftp://ftp.iza.org/ dps/dp1588.pdf
5. Dehejia, R. H., &, Wahba, S., (1998). Propensity score matching methods for non-experimental causal studies. National Bureau of economic research working paper series, No. 6829. Retrieved November 28, 2012, from http://www.nber.org/papers/w6829
6. Gangl, M., (2004). Rosenbaum sensitivity analysis for average treatment effects on the treated. Berlin: Boston College, Department of Economics. Retrieved November 28, 2012, from http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s438301. html
7. Guo, S., &, Fraser, M. W., (2010). Propensity score analysis: statistical methods and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
8. Hargittai, E., (2002). Beyond logs and surveys: in-depth measures of people's web use skills. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53, 14, 1239-1244.
9. Hargittai, E., (2005). Survey measures of web-oriented digital literacy. Social Science Computer Review, 23, 3, 371-379. doi: 10.1177/0894439305275911.
10. Johnson, D. W., &, Johnson, R. T., (1987). Learning together and alone: cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (2nd ed., Vol. xiii). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
11. Leuven, E., &, Sianesi, B., (2003). PSMATCH2: STATA module to perform full mahalanobis and propensity score matching, common support graphing, and covariate imbalance testing. Retrieved November 28, 2012, from http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s432001.html
12. Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., &, Jones, K., (2009). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: a meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development. Retrieved November 28, 2012, from http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/ finalreport.pdf
13. Neuman, S. B., &, Celano, D., (2006). The Knowledge gap: implications of leveling the playing field for low income and middle-income children. Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 2, 176-201.
14. OECD (2010). Higher education in regional and city development. The autonomous region of Catalonia, Spain. Catalonia, Spain: OECD. Retrieved November 28, 2012, from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/28/36/46826969.pdf
15. Osorio, L. A., &, Duart, J. M., (2012). A hybrid approach to university subject learning activities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43, 2, 259-271.
16. Rosenbaum, P., (2002). Observational studies (2a ed.). New York: Springer.
17. Rosenbaum, P. R., &, Rubin, D. B., (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 1, 41-55.
18. Ross, S. M., Morrison, G. R., &, Lowther, D. L., (2010). Educational technology research past and present: balancing rigor and relevance to impact school learning. Contemporary Educational Technology, 1, 1, 17-35. Retrieved November 28, 2012, from http://www.cedtech.net/articles/11/112.pdf
19. Rouse, C. E., &, Krueger, A. B., (2004). Putting computerized instruction to the test: a randomized evaluation of a "scientifically based" reading program. Economics of Education Review, 23, 4, 323-338.
20. Roy, A. D., (1951). Some thoughts on the distribution of income. Oxford Economics Papers, 2, 135-146.
21. Rubin, D. B., (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Retrieved November 28, 2012, from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ118470
22. Schneider, B., Carnoy, M., Kilpatrick, J., Schmidt, W., &, Shalvelson, R., (2007). Estimating causal effects using experimental and observational designs. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association. Retrieved November 28, 2012, from http://www.aera.net/ uploadedFiles/Publications/Books/Estimating-Causal-Effects/Causal-Effects.pdf
23. Slavin, R. E., (1996). Research on cooperative learning and achievement: what we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 1, 43-69.
24. Smith Jaggars, S., &, Bailey, T., (2010). Effectiveness of fully online courses for college students: response to a department of education meta-analysis. New York: Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University. Retrieved November 28, 2012, from http://ccrc.tc.columbia. edu/Publication.asp?UID=796
25. Tamim, R. M., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Abrami, P. C., &, Schmid, R. F., (2011). What forty years of research says about the impact of technology on learning. Review of Educational Research, 81, 1, 4-28. doi: 10.3102/0034654310393361.