Development of the PRE-HIT instrument: Patient readiness to engage in health information technology

BMC Family Practice

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Koopman, Richelle J ^a   Petroski, Gregory F ^b   Canfield, Shannon M ^b   Stuppy, Julie A ^a   Mehr, David R ^a  

^a University of Missouri   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

Chronic care; Information management informatics; Measurement issues instrument development; Quantitative methods

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HEALTH LITERACY; HUMAN; INTERNET; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HEALTH LITERACY; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84892918651     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712296     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-15-18     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Pew Internet: health. http://www.pewinternet.org/topics/Health
2. Web-based care management in patients with poorly controlled diabetes. McMahon GT, Gomes HE, Hickson HS, Hu TM, Levine BA, Conlin PR, Diabetes Care 2005 28 1624 1629 10.2337/diacare.28.7.1624 15983311 (Pubitemid 40923075)
3. Improving patient-clinician communication about chronic conditions: description of an internet-based nurse E-coach intervention. Allen M, Iezzoni LI, Huang A, Huang L, Leveille SG, Nurs Res 2008 57 107 112 10.1097/01.NNR. 0000313478.47379.98 18347482
4. Internet-based chronic disease self-management: a randomized trial. Lorig KR, Ritter PL, Laurent DD, Plant K, Med Care 2006 44 964 971 10.1097/01.mlr.0000233678.80203.c1 17063127 (Pubitemid 44674028)
5. Internet use by primary care patients: where is the digital divide? Kruse RL, Koopman RJ, Wakefield BJ, Wakefield DS, Keplinger LE, Mehr DR, Fam Med 2012 44 342 347 23027117
6. Internet users' information privacy concerns (IUIPC): the construct, the scale, and a causal model. Malhotra NK, Kim SS, Agarwal J, Inf Syst Res 2004 15 336 355 10.1287/isre.1040.0032 (Pubitemid 40192456)
7. eHEALS: the eHealth Literacy Scale. Norman CD, Skinner HA, J Med Internet Res 2006 8 27 10.2196/jmir.8.4.e27 17213046 (Pubitemid 47450198)
8. eHealth literacy: essential skills for consumer health in a networked world. Norman CD, Skinner HA, J Med Internet Res 2006 8 9 10.2196/jmir.8.2.e9 16867972 (Pubitemid 44030756)
9. Does the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) measure what it intends to measure? Validation of a Dutch version of the eHEALS in two adult populations. van der Vaart R, Van Deursen AJ, Drossaert CH, Taal E, Van Dijk JA, van de Laar MA, J Med Internet Res 2011 13 86 10.2196/jmir.1840 22071338
10. Improving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action. Wagner EH, Austin BT, Davis C, Hindmarsh M, Schaefer J, Bonomi A, Health Aff (Millwood) 2001 20 64 78 10.1377/hlthaff.20.6.64 11816692 (Pubitemid 33707442)
11. Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). Czaja SJ, Charness N, Fisk AD, Hertzog C, Nair SN, Rogers WA, Sharit J, Psychol Aging 2006 21 333 352 16768579 (Pubitemid 44212031)
12. Health information, the Internet, and the digital divide. Brodie M, Flournoy RE, Altman DE, Blendon RJ, Benson JM, Rosenbaum MD, Health Aff (Millwood) 2000 19 255 265 10.1377/hlthaff.19.6.255 11192412
13. Are your patients ready for electronic communication? Pelletier AL, Sutton GR, Walker RR, Fam Pract Manag 2007 14 25 26
14. An examination of the factor structures and concurrent validities for the computer attitude scale, the computer anxiety rating scale, and the computer-self-efficacy scale. Harrison AW, Rainer RK, Educ Psychol Meas 1992 52 735 745 10.1177/0013164492052003024
15. Perceived versus actual computer-email-web fluency. Bunz U, Curry C, Voon W, Comput Human Behav 2007 23 2321 2344 10.1016/j.chb.2006.03.008 (Pubitemid 46483984)
16. The development of a measure of subjective computer experience. Smith B, Caputi P, Rawstorne P, Comput Human Behav 2007 23 127 145 10.1016/j.chb.2004.04. 001 (Pubitemid 44278487)
17. The Computer-Email-Web (CEW) Fluency Scale-development and validation. Bunz U, Int J Hum Comput Interact 2004 17 479 506 10.1207/s15327590ijhc1704-3 (Pubitemid 40297483)
18. Development of a scale for measuring user computer experience. Yaghmaie F, J Res Nurs 2007 12 185 190 10.1177/1744987106068353
19. The measurement of computer attitudes: an empirical comparison of available scales. Gardner DG, Discenza R, Dukes RL, J Educ Comput Res 1993 9 487 507 10.2190/DXLM-5J80-FNKH-PP2L
20. A comparison of four computer attitude scales. Woodrow JE, J Educ Comput Res 1991 7 165 187 10.2190/WLAM-P42V-12A3-4LLQ
21. Development and validation of the computer self-efficacy scale. Murphy CA, Coover D, Owen SV, Educ Psychol Meas 1989 49 893 899 10.1177/ 001316448904900412
22. Validation of a brief, reliable scale to measure knowledge about the health risks associated with obesity. Swift JA, Glazebrook C, Macdonald I, Int J Obes (Lond) 2006 30 661 668 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803165 16276360
23. Cumulative Illness Rating Scale was a reliable and valid index in a family practice context. Hudon C, Fortin M, Vanasse A, J Clin Epidemiol 2005 58 603 608 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.10.017 15878474 (Pubitemid 40692726)
24. Validation of the cumulative illness rating scale in a geriatric residential population. Parmelee PA, Thuras PD, Katz IR, Lawton MP, J Am Geriatr Soc 1995 43 130 137 7836636
25. The Duke Severity of Illness Checklist (DUSOI) for measurement of severity and comorbidity. Parkerson GR Jr, Broadhead WE, Tse CK, J Clin Epidemiol 1993 46 379 393 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90153-R 8483003 (Pubitemid 23149056)
26. The revised illness perception questionnaire (IPQ-R). Moss-Morris R, Weinman J, Petrie KJ, Horne R, Cameron LD, Buick D, Psychol Health 2002 17 1 16 10.1080/08870440290001494
27. The illness perception questionnaire: a new method for assessing the cognitive representation of illness. Weinman J, Petrie KJ, Moss-Morris R, Horne R, Psychol Health 1996 11 431 445 10.1080/08870449608400270
28. The influence of perceived risk knowledge on risk communication. Wrench JS, Commun Res Rep 2007 24 63 70 10.1080/08824090601128182
29. The test of functional health literacy in adults: a new instrument for measuring patients' literacy skills. Parker RM, Baker DW, Williams MV, Nurss JR, J Gen Intern Med 1995 10 537 541 10.1007/BF02640361 8576769
30. Brief report: screening items to identify patients with limited health literacy skills. Wallace LS, Rogers ES, Roskos SE, Holiday DB, Weiss BD, J Gen Intern Med 2006 21 874 877 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00532.x 16881950 (Pubitemid 44024936)
31. Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: a shortened screening instrument. Davis TC, Long SW, Jackson RH, Mayeaux EJ, George RB, Murphy PW, Crouch MA, Fam Med 1993 25 391 395 8349060 (Pubitemid 23183311)
32. Rapid assessment of literacy levels of adult primary care patients. Davis TC, Crouch MA, Long SW, Jackson RH, Bates P, George RB, Bairnsfather LE, Fam Med 1991 23 433 435 1936717
33. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, J Consult Clin Psychol 1983 51 390 395 6863699
34. The contemplation ladder: validation of a measure of readiness to consider smoking cessation. Biener L, Abrams DB, Health Psychol 1991 10 360 365 1935872
35. Selecting the items. Streiner DL, Norman GR, Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use New York: Oxford University Press 2 1995 54 68
36. Structured personality test item characteristics and validity. Holden RR, Fekken GC, Jackson DN, J Res Pers 1985 19 386 394 10.1016/0092-6566(85)90007-8
37. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Likert R, Arch Psychol 1932 22 1 55
38. Biases in responding. Streiner DL, Norman GR, Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use New York: Oxford University Press 2 1995 69 84
39. Minimum sample size recommendations for conducting factor analyses. Mundfrom DJ, Shaw DG, Tian LK, Int J Test 2005 5 159 168 10.1207/ s15327574ijt0502-4
40. Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Fabrigar LR, Wegener DT, MacCallum RC, Strahan EJ, Psychol Methods 1999 4 272 299
41. Time-limit tests: estimating their reliability and degree of speeding. Cronbach LJ, Warrington WG, Psychometrika 1951 16 167 188 10.1007/BF02289113 14844557
42. Influences, usage, and outcomes of Internet health information searching: multivariate results from the Pew surveys. Rice RE, Int J Med Inform 2006 75 8 28 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.07.032 16125453 (Pubitemid 43075559)
43. National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2010 summary tables. 2010 http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/ahcd/namcs-summary/2010-namcs-web-tables.pdf
44. Users of Internet health information: differences by health status. Houston TK, Allison JJ, J Med Internet Res 2002 4 7 10.2196/jmir.4.2.e7 12554554
45. USA QuickFacts from the US Census. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/ states/00000.html