Exposure studies of core-shell Fe/Fe3O4 and Cu/CuO NPs to lettuce (Lactuca sativa) plants: Are they a potential physiological and nutritional hazard?

Journal of Hazardous Materials

Volumn 267, Issue , 2014, Pages 255-263

  Trujillo Reyes, J ^a   Majumdar, S ^a   Botez, C E ^a   Peralta Videa, J R ^a   Gardea Torresdey, J L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO   (United States)

Author keywords

Edible plants; Enzymatic stress; Hydroponics; Nanoscale oxides; Nutritional quality

Indexed keywords

CHLOROPHYLL CONTENTS; EDIBLE PLANTS; ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION; HYDROPONICS; NANO-SCALE MATERIALS; NANOSCALE OXIDES; NUTRITIONAL QUALITIES; PHYSIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS;

CHEMICALS REMOVAL (WATER TREATMENT); NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS;

QUALITY CONTROL;

ASCORBATE PEROXIDASE; CATALASE; COPPER NANOPARTICLE; IRON; IRON OXIDE;

GROWTH RATE; GROWTH RESPONSE; NUTRIENT AVAILABILITY; NUTRIENT CYCLING; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT COMMUNITY; ROOT SYSTEM;

ARTICLE; BIOMASS; CHLOROPHYLL CONTENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENZYME ACTIVITY; HAZARD; LETTUCE; NONHUMAN; PHYTOTOXICITY; PLANT GROWTH; ROOT LENGTH; WATER CONTENT;

EDIBLE PLANTS; ENZYMATIC STRESS; HYDROPONICS; NANOSCALE OXIDES; NUTRITIONAL QUALITY;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANTIOXIDANTS; ASCORBATE PEROXIDASES; CATALASE; COPPER; FERROUS COMPOUNDS; HYDROPONICS; LETTUCE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, TRANSMISSION; NANOPARTICLES; NUTRITIVE VALUE; PARTICLE SIZE; SUSPENSIONS; TISSUE DISTRIBUTION;

EID: 84892892883     PISSN: 03043894     EISSN: 18733336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.11.067     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Noubactep C., Caré S., Crane R. Nanoscale metallic iron for environmental remediation: prospects and limitations. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2012, 223:1363-1382.
2. O'Carroll D., Sleep B., Krol M., Boparai H., Kocur C. Nanoscale zero valent iron and bimetallic particles for contaminated site remediation. Adv. Water Resour. 2013, 51:104-122.
3. Tang S.C.N., Lo I.M.C. Magnetic nanoparticles: essential factors for sustainable environmental applications. Water Res. 2013, 47:2613-2632.
4. Gogos A., Knauer K., Bucheli T.D. Nanomaterials in plant protection and fertilization: current state, foreseen applications, and research priorities. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60:9781-9792.
5. Khot L.R., Sankaran S., Maja J.M., Ehsani R., Schuster E.W. Applications of nanomaterials in agricultural production and crop protection: a review. J. Crop Prot. 2012, 35:64-70.
6. Hong J., Peralta-Videa J.R., Gardea-Torresdey J.L. Nanomaterials in agricultural production: benefits and possible threats?. Sustainable Nanotechnology and the Environment: Advances and Achievements 2013, 73-89. Am. Chem. Soc., Washington, DC. N. Shamin, V.K. Sharma (Eds.).
7. Peralta-Videa J.R., Lopez M.L., Narayan M., Gardea-Torresdey J.L. The biochemistry of environmental heavy metal uptake by plants: implications for the food chain. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2009, 41:1665-1677.
8. Nimmo D.W.R., Preul M.A., Castle C.J., Self J.R., Pillsbury R.W., Bergey E.A. Effect of excess copper on growth of wild rice (Zizania palustris) seedlings tested in reconstituted and natural waters. Environ. Manage. 2003, 32(4):466-475.
9. Sheldon A.R., Menzies N.W. The effect of copper toxicity on the growth and root morphology of Rhodes grass (Chloris gayana Knuth) in resin buffered solution culture. Plant Soil 2005, 278:341-349.
10. Pourakbar L., Khayami M., Khara J., Farbodnia T. Physiological effects of copper on some biochemical parameters in Zea mays L. seedlings. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2007, 10(22):4092-4096.
11. Li Y., Song Y., Shi G., Wang J., Hou X. Response of antioxidant activity to excess copper in two cultivars of Brassica campestris ssp. Chinensis Makino. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2009, 31:155-162.
12. Bouazizi H., Jouili H., Geitmann A., El Ferjani E. Cell wall accumulation of Cu ions and modulation of lignifying enzymes in primary leaves of bean seedlings exposed to excess copper. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2011, 139:97-107.
13. Pereira E.G., Oliva M.A., Rosado-Souza L., Camargo Mendes G., Santos Colares D., Henrique Stopato C., Miyasaka Almeida A. Iron excess affects rice photosynthesis through stomatal and non-stomatal limitations. Plant Sci. 2013, 201-202:81-92.
14. Siqueira-Silva A.I., Campos da Silva L., Alves Azevedo A., Oliva M.A. Iron plaque formation and morphoanatomy of roots from species of restinga subjected to excess iron. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2012, 78:265-275.
15. Lee W.M., An Y.J., Yoon H., Kweon H.S. Toxicity and bioavailability of copper nanoparticles to the terrestrial plants mung bean (Phaseolus radiatus) and wheat (Triticum aestivum): plant agar test for water-insoluble nanoparticles. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2008, 27(9):1915-1921.
16. Ma X., Gurung A., Deng Y. Phytotoxicity and uptake of nanoscale zero-valent iron (nZVI) by two plant species. Sci. Total Environ. 2013, 443:844-849.
17. Zhu H., Han J., Xiao J.Q., Jin Y. Uptake, translocation, and accumulation of manufactured iron oxide nanoparticles by pumpkin plants. J. Environ. Monit. 2008, 10:713-717.
18. Wu S.G., Huang L., Head J., Chen D.R., Kong I.C., Tang Y.J. Phytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles is related to both dissolved metal ions and adsorption of particles on seed surfaces. Pet. Environ. Biotechnol. 2012, 3(4):126.
19. 2 nanoparticles on soybean (Glycine max) plants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44(19):7315-7320.
20. Hernandez-Viezcas J.A., Castillo-Michel H., Servin A.D., Peralta-Videa J.R., Gardea-Torresdey J.L. Spectroscopic verification of zinc absorption and distribution in the desert plant Prosopis juliflora-velutina (velvet mesquite) treated with ZnO nanoparticles. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 170:346-352.
21. 2, heat shock protein, and lipid peroxidation. ACS Nano 2012, 6(11):9615-9622.
22. Kim S., Lee S., Lee I. Alteration of phytotoxicity and oxidant stress potential by metal oxide nanoparticles in Cucumis sativus. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2012, 223:2799-2806.
23. Rico C.M., Hong J., Morales M.I., Zhao L., Barrios A.C., Zhang J.Y., Peralta-Videa J.R., Gardea-Torresdey J.L. Effect of cerium oxide nanoparticles on rice: a study involving the antioxidant defense system and in vivo fluorescence imaging. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47:5635-5642.
24. Baslam M., Morales F., Garmendia I., Goicoechea N. Nutritional quality of outer and inner leaves of green and red pigmented lettuces (Lactuca sativa L.) consumed as salads. Sci. Horticult. - Amsterdam 2013, 151:103-111.
25. Peralta-Videa J.R., Gardea-Torresdey J.L., Gómez E., Tiemann K.J., Parsons J.G., Carrillo G. Effect of mixed cadmium, copper, nickel and zinc at different pHs upon alfalfa growth and heavy metal uptake. Environ. Pollut. 2002, 119:291-301.
26. Kingston H.M., Jassie L.B. Introduction to Microwave Sample Preparation 1988, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC.
27. 2 nanoparticle transfer from soil into the food chain. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47:11592-11598.
28. Aebi H. Catalase. Methods of Enzymatic Analysis 1974, 680. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, Academic Press, New York. H.U. Bergmeyer (Ed.).
29. Nakano Y., Asada K. Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate-specific peroxidases in spinach chloroplasts. Plant Cell Physiol. 1981, 22:867-880.
30. Bradford M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72:248-254.
31. Bokare A.D., Chikate R.C., Rode C.V., Paknikar K.M. Effect of surface chemistry of Fe-Ni nanoparticles on mechanistic pathways of azo dye degradation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41:7437-7443.
32. Navarro E., Baun A., Behra R., Hartmann N.B., Filser J., Miao A.J., Quigg A., Santschi P.H., Sigg L. Environmental behavior and ecotoxicity of engineered nanoparticles to algae, plants, and fungi. Ecotoxicology 2008, 17:372-386.
33. 2 nanoparticles in aqueous suspensions at acidic and circumneutral pH: surface coverage, surface speciation, and its impact on nanoparticle-nanoparticle interactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132:14986-14994.
34. Keller A.A., Wang H., Zhou D., Lenihan H.S., Cherr G., Cardinale B.J., Miller R., Ji Z. Stability and aggregation of metal oxide nanoparticles in natural aqueous matrices. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44(6):1962-1967.
35. Liu J., Legros S., Ma G., Veinot J.G.C., Von der Kammer F., Hofmann T. Influence of surface functionalization and particle size on the aggregation kinetics of engineered nanoparticles. Chemosphere 2012, 87:918-924.
36. Fernandes J.C., Henriques F.S. Biochemical, physiological, and structural effects of excess copper in plants. Bot. Rev. 1991, 57(3):246-273.
37. Yruela I. Copper in plants. Braz. J. Plant Physiol. 2005, 17(1):145-156.
38. Nekrasova G.F., Ushakova O.S., Ermakov A.E., Uimin M.A., Byzov I.V. Effects of copper(II) ions and copper oxide nanoparticles on Elodea densa Planch. Russ. J. Ecol. 2011, 42(6):458-463.
39. Karimi P., Khavari-Nejad R.A., Niknam V., Ghahremaninejad F., Najafi F. The effects of excess copper on antioxidative enzymes, lipid peroxidation, proline, chlorophyll, and concentration of Mn, Fe, and Cu in Astragalus neo-mobayenii. Sci. World J. 2012, 10.1100/2012/615670.
40. Shi J., Abid A.D., Kennedy I.M., Hristova K.R., Silk W.K. To duckweeds (Landoltia punctate), nanoparticulate copper oxide is more inhibitory than the soluble copper in the bulk solution. Environ. Pollut. 2011, 159(5):1277-1282.
41. Asli S., Neumann P.M. Colloidal suspensions of clay or titanium dioxide NPs can inhibit leaf growth and transpiration via physical effects on root water transport. Plant Cell Environ. 2009, 32:577-584.
42. Deák M., Horváth G.V., Davletova S., Török K., Sass L., Vass I., Barna B., Király Z., Dudits D. Plants ectopically expressing the iron-binding protein, ferritin, are tolerant to oxidative damage and pathogens. Nat. Biotechnol. 1999, 17:192-196.
43. Barrena R., Casals E., Colón J., Font X., Sánchez A., Puntes V. Evaluation of the ecotoxicity of model nanoparticles. Chemosphere 2009, 75:850-857.
44. Lee C.W., Mahendra S., Zodrow K., Li D., Tsai Y.C., Braam J., Alvarez P.J.J. Developmental phytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles to Arabidopsis thaliana. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2010, 29(3):669-675.
45. Taiz L., Zeiger E. Plant Physiology 1998, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA. 2nd ed.
46. Azooz M.M., Abou-Elhamd M.F., Al-Fredan M.A. Biphasic effect of copper on growth, proline, lipid peroxidation and antioxidant enzyme activities of wheat (Triticum aestivum cv Hasaawi) at early growing stage. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2012, 6(4):688-694.
47. 2 and is indispensable for stress defence in C-3 plants. EMBO J. 1997, 16:4806-4816.
48. Hou W., Chen X., Song G., Wang Q., Chang C.C. Effects of copper and cadmium on heavy metal polluted waterbody restoration by duckweed (Lemna minor). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2007, 45:62-69.
49. Li X., Ma H., Jia P., Wang J., Jia L., Zhang T., Yang Y., Chen H., Wei X. Responses of seedling growth and antioxidant activity to excess iron and copper in Triticum aestivum L. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2012, 86:47-53.