Clinical applicability of resin infiltration for proximal caries

Quintessence International

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 97-104

  Altarabulsi, Mohammad Basel ^a   Alkilzy, Mohammad ^a,b   Splieth, Christian H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GREIFSWALD   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALEPPO   (Syrian Arab Republic)

Author keywords

Caries infiltration; Clinical applicability; Initial lesions; Patient satisfaction; Proximal caries

Indexed keywords

DENTAL MATERIAL; ICON INFILTRANT; RESIN;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CHEMISTRY; CHILD; COFFERDAM; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECIDUOUS TOOTH; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; DISEASE COURSE; DRUG EFFECT; ENAMEL; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRESCHOOL CHILD; TIME; YOUNG ADULT; DRUG EFFECTS; PROCEDURES;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN; DISEASE PROGRESSION; DMF INDEX; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; RESINS, SYNTHETIC; RUBBER DAMS; TIME FACTORS; TOOTH, DECIDUOUS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84892850937     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3290/j.qi.a28934     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Dummer PMH, Addy M, Oliver SJ, Hicks R, Kingdon A, Shaw WC. Changes in the distribution of decayed and filled tooth surfaces and the progression of approximal caries in children between the ages of 11-12 years and 15-16 years. Br Dent J 1988;164:277-282.
2. Cheslnutt IG, Schafer F, Jacobson APM, Stephen KW. Incremental susceptibility of individual tooth surfaces to dental caries in Scottish adolescents. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1996;24:11-16.
3. Marthaler TM, Brunelle T, Downer MC, et al. The Prevalence of dental caries in Europe 1990-1995. Caries Res 1996;30:237-255.
4. Poorterman JHG, Aartman IHA, Kieft JA, Kalsbeek H. Value of bitewing radiographs in a clinical epidemiological study and their effect on the DMFS index. Caries Res 2000;34:159-163.
5. Mejàre I, Mjör IA. Prognosis for caries and restorations. In: Fejerskov O, Kidd EAM (eds). Dental Caries:The Disease and its Clinical Management. Copenhagen: Blackwell Munksgaard, 2003;295-303.
6. Kuzmina IN, Kuzmina E, Ekstrand KR. Dental caries among children from Solntsevsky-A district in Moscow, 1993. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1995;23:266-270.
7. Duggal MS. Research summary: Carious primary teeth: Their fate in your hands. Br Dent J 2002;192:215.
8. Ekstrand KR. Faglig vide om caries [abstract in English]. Dan Dent J 2006;110:788-799.
9. Mejàre I, Källestål C, Stenlund H. Incidence and progression of approximal caries from 11 to 22 years of age in Sweden: A prospective radiographic study. Caries Res 1999;33:93-100.
10. Mejare I, Stenlund H, Zelezny-Holmlund C. Caries incidence and lesion progression from adolescence to young adulthood: A prospective 15-year cohort study in Sweden. Caries Res 2004;38:130-141.
11. Vidnes-Kopperud S, Tveit AB, Espelid I. Changes in the treatment concept for approximal caries from 1983 to 2009 in Norway. Caries Res 2011;45:113-120.
12. Selwitz RH, Ismail AI, Pitts NB. Dental caries. Lancet 2007;369:51-59.
13. Pitts NB, Wefel JS. Remineralization/desensitization:What is known? What is the future? Adv Dent Res 2009;21:83-86.
14. Bakdash B. Current patterns of oral hygiene product use and practices. Periodontol 2000 1995;8:11-14.
15. Levin L, Shenkman A. The relationship between dental caries status and oral health attitudes and behavior in young Israeli adults. J Dent Educ 2004;68:1185-1191.
16. Ashkenazi M, Cohen R, Levin L. Self-reported compliance with preventive measures among regularly attending pediatric patients. J Dent Educ 2007;71:287-295.
17. Gomez SS, Basili CP, Emilson CG. A 2-year clinical evaluation of sealed noncavitated approximal posterior carious lesions in adolescents. Clin Oral Investig 2005;9:239-243.
18. Martignon S, Ekstrand KR, Ellwood R. Efficacy of sealing proximal early active lesions: An 18-month clinical study evaluated by conventional and subtraction radiography. Caries Res 2006;40:382-388.
19. Alkilzy M, Berndt C, Meller C, Schidlowski M, Splieth C. Sealing of proximal surfaces with polyurethane tape: A two-year clinical and radiographic feasibility study. J Adhes Dent 2009;11:91-94.
20. Abuchaim C, Rotta M, Grande RH, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Effectiveness of sealing active proximal caries lesions with an adhesive system: 1-year clinical evaluation. Braz Oral Res 2010;24:361-367.
21. Mueller J, Meyer-Lueckel H, Paris S, Hopfenmuller W, Kielbassa AM. Inhibition of lesion progression by the penetration of resins in vitro: Influence of the application procedure. Oper Dent 2006;31:338-345.
22. Meyer-Lueckel H, Paris S, Kielbassa AM. Surface layer erosion of natural caries lesions with phosphoric and hydrochloric acid gels in preparation for resin infiltration. Caries Res 2007;41:223-230.
23. Paris S, Meyer-Lueckel H, Cölfen H, Kielbassa AM. Resin infiltration of artificial enamel caries lesions with experimental light curing resins. Dent Mater J 2007;26:582-588.
24. Paris S, Meyer-Lueckel H, Kielbassa AM. Resin infiltration of natural caries lesions. J Dent Res 2007;86:662-666.
25. Meyer-Lueckel H, Paris S. Improved resin infiltration of natural caries lesions. J Dent Res 2008;87:1112-1116.
26. Meyer-Lueckel H, Paris S. Progression of artificial enamel caries lesions after infiltration with experimental light curing resins. Caries Res 2008;42:117-124.
27. Kielbassa AM, Muller J, Gernhardt CR. Closing the gap between oral hygiene and minimally invasive dentistry: A review on the resin infiltration technique of incipient (proximal) enamel lesions. Quintessence Int 2009;40:663-681.
28. Mueller J, Yang F, Neumann K, Kielbassa AM. Surface tridimensional topography analysis of materials and finishing procedures after resinous infiltration of subsurface bovine enamel lesions. Quintessence Int 2011;42:135-147.
29. Paris S, Hopfenmuller W, Meyer-Lueckel H. Resin infiltration of caries lesions: An efficacy randomized trial. J Dent Res 2010;89:823-826.
30. Ekstrand KR, Bakhshandeh A, Martignon S. Treatment of proximal superficial caries lesions on primary molar teeth with resin infiltration and fluoride varnish versus fluoride varnish only: Efficacy after 1 year. Caries Res 2010;44:41-46.
31. Blinkhorn A, Zadeh-Kabir R. Dental care of a child in pain-a comparison of treatment planning options offered by GDPs in California and the Northwest of England. Int J Paediatr Dent 2003;13:165-171.
32. Threlfall AG, Pilkington L, Milsom KM, Blinkhorn AS, Tickle M. General dental practitioners’ views on the use of stainless steel crowns to restore primary molars. Br Dent J 2005;199:453-455.
33. Fayle SA. UK National Clinical Guidelines in Paediatric Dentistry. Stainless steel preformed crowns for primary molars. Faculty of Dental Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons. Int J Paediatr Dent 1999;9:311-314.
34. Bouillaguet S, Degrange M, Cattani M, Godin C, Meyer JM. Bonding to dentin achieved by general practitioners. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 2002;112:1006-1011.
35. Robinson C, Hallsworth AS, Shore RC, Kirkham J. Effect of surface zone deproteinisation on the access of mineral ions into subsurface carious lesions of human enamel. Caries Res 1990;24:226-230.
36. Shellis RP, Hallsworth AS, Kirkham J, Robinson C. Organic material and the optical properties of the dark zone in caries lesions of enamel. Eur J Oral Sci 2002;110:392-395.
37. Lynch CD, McConnell RJ. Attitudes and use of rubber dam by Irish general dental practitioners. Int Endod J 2007;40:427-432.
38. Badzio H, Hahn E. Vergleichende Quali täts be urteilung von Amalgam- und Kunststoffüllungen im Seitenzahnbereich [thesis] [in German]. Greifswald:University of Greifswald, 2000.
39. Kubo S, Kawasaki A, Hayashi Y. Factors associated with the longevity of resin composite restorations. Dent Mater J 2011;30:374-383.
40. Qvist V, Johannessen L, Bruun M. Progression of approximal caries in relation to iatrogenic preparation damage. J Dent Res 1992;71:1370-1373.
41. Medeiros VAF, Seddon RP. Iatrogenic damage to approximal surfaces in contact with Class II restorations. J Dent 2000;28:103-110.