Collaboration in pharmaceutical research: Exploration of country-level determinants

Scientometrics

Volumn 98, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 1173-1202

  Plotnikova, Tatiana ^a   Rake, Bastian ^b  

^a STATEC   (Luxembourg)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PASSAU   (Germany)

Author keywords

International cooperation; Pharmaceuticals; Proximity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892843244     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-013-1182-6     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Acosta, M., Coronado, D., Ferrádiz, E., & León, M. (2011). Factors affecting inter-regional academic scientific collaboration within Europe: The role of economic distance. Scientometrics, 87(1), 63-74.
2. Adams, J. D., Black, G. C., Clemmons, J. R., & Stephan, P. E. (2005). Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from U. S. Universities, 1981-1999. Research Policy, 34(3), 259-285.
3. Agrawal, A., Cockburn, I., & McHale, J. (2006). Gone but not forgotten: Knowledge flows, labor mobility, and enduring social relationships. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(5), 571-591.
4. Asheim, B., Coenen, L., & Vang, J. (2007). Face-to-face, buzz, and knowledge bases: Sociospatial implications for learning, innovation, and innovation policy. Environment and Planning C: Government and Polic, 25(5), 655-670.
5. Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. The American Economic Review, 86(3), 630-640.
6. Autant-Bernard, C., Billand, P., Frachisse, D., & Massard, N. (2007). Social distance versus spatial distance in R&D cooperation: Empirical evidence from European collaboration choices in micro and nanotechnologies. Papers in Regional Science, 86(3), 495-519.
7. Balland, P.-A. (2012). Proximity and the evolution of collaboration networks: Evidence from research and development projects within the global navigation satellite system (GNSS) industry. Regional Studies, 46(6), 741-756. forthcoming.
8. Bartholomew, S. (1997). National systems of biotechnology innovation: Complex interdependence in the global system. Journal of International Business Studies, 28(2), 241-266.
9. Basile, R., Capello, R., & Caragliu, A. (2012). Technological interdependence and regional growth in Europe: Proximity and synergy in knowledge spillovers. Papers in Regional Science, 91(4), 697-722.
10. Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1): 61-74.
11. Boschma, R., & Lambooy, J. G. (1999). Evolutionary economics and economic geography. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 9(4), 411-429.
12. Boshoff, N. (2009). Neo-colonialism and research collaboration in Central Africa. Scientometrics, 81(2), 413-434.
13. Broekel, T., & Boschma, R. (2012). Knowledge networks in the Dutch aviation industry: The proximity paradox. Journal of Economic Geography, 12(2), 409-433.
14. Burger, M., van Oort, F., & Linders, G.-J. (2009). On the specification of the gravity model of trade: Zeros, excess zeros and zero-inflated estimation. Spatial Economic Analysis, 4(2), 167-190.
15. Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (1990). Regression-based tests for overdispersion in the Poisson model. Journal of Econometrics, 46(3), 347-364.
16. Cantner, U., & Meder, A. (2007). Technological proximity and the choice of cooperation partner. Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, 2(1), 45-65.
17. Choi, S. (2012). Core-periphery, new clusters, or rising stars? International scientific collaboration among 'advanced' countries in the era of globalization. Scientometrics, 90(1), 25-41.
18. Coenen, L., Moodysson, J., & Asheim, B. T. (2004). Nodes, networks and proximities: On the knowledge dynamics of the Medicon Valley biotech cluster. European Planning Studies, 12(7), 1003-1018.
19. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152.
20. de Crombrugghe, D., Farla, K., Meisel, N., de Neubourg, C., Aoudia, J. O., & Szirmai, A. (2009). Institutional profiles database III-Presentation of the institutional profiles database 2009 (IPD 2009). Documents des Travail de la DGTPE, 2009/14.
21. de Solla Price, D. (1963). Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press.
22. Dosi, G., Pavitt, K., & Soete, L. (1990). The economics of technical change and international trade. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
23. Edquist, C., & Johnson, B. (1997). Institutions and organizations in systems of innovation. in Systems of innovation: Technologies, institutions, and organizations (pp. 41-63). London: Pinter.
24. Felbermayr, G. J., & Toubal, F. (2010). Cultural proximity and trade. European Economic Review, 54(2), 279-293.
25. Flowerdew, R., & Aitkin, M. (1982). A method of fitting the gravity model based on the Poisson distribution. Journal of Regional Science, 22(2), 191-202.
26. Frenken, K., Hoekman, J., Kok, S., Ponds, R., van Oort, F., & van Vliet, J. (2009). Death of distance in science? A gravity approach to research collaboration. In A. Pyka, & A. Scharnhorst (Eds.), Innovation networks (pp. 43-57). Berlin: Springer.
27. Furman, J. L., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2002). The determinants of national innovative capacity. Research Policy, 31(6), 899-933.
28. Gertler, M. S. (1995). "Being there": Proximity, organization, and culture in the development and adoption of advanced manufacturing technologies. Economic Geography, 71(1), 1-26.
29. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. The American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481-510.
30. Greene, W. H. (1994). Accounting for excess zeros and sample selection in Poisson and negative binomial regression models. NYU Working Paper, No. EC-94-10.
31. Hagedoorn, J. (2002). Inter-firm R&D partnerships: An overview of major trends and patterns since 1960. Research Policy, 31(4), 477-492.
32. Hamilton, K. S. (2003). Subfield and level classification of journals. CHI Research Inc., CHI No. 2012-R.
33. Helpman, E., Melitz, M., & Rubinstein, Y. (2008). Estimating trade flows: Trading partners and trading volumes. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(2), 441-487.
34. Hoekman, J., Frenken, K., & Tijssen, R. J. (2010). Research collaboration at a distance: Changing spatial patterns of scientific collaboration within Europe. Research Policy, 39(5), 662-673.
35. Hoekman, J., Frenken, K., & van Oort, F. (2009). The geography of collaborative knowledge production in Europe. The Annals of Regional Science, 43(3), 721-738.
36. Hoekman, J., Scherngell, T., Frenken, K., & Tijssen, R. (2013). Acquisition of European research funds and its effect on international scientific collaboration. Journal of Economic Geography, 13(1), 23-52.
37. Howells, J. R. L. (2002). Tacit knowledge, innovation and economic geography. Urban Studies, 39(5-6), 871-884.
38. Isard, W. (1954). Location theory and trade theory: Short-run analysis. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 68(2), 305-320.
39. Jaffe, A. B. (1986). Technological opportunity and spillovers of R &D: Evidence from firms' patents, profits, and market value. The American Economic Review, 76(5), 984-1001.
40. Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 577-598.
41. Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1-18.
42. Kirat, T., & Lung, Y. (1999). Innovation and proximity: Territories as loci of collective learning processes. European Urban and Regional Studies, 6(1), 27-38.
43. Laudel, G. (2002). What do we measure by co-authorships? Research Evaluation, 11(1), 3-15.
44. Lundberg, J., Tomson, G., Lundkvist, I., Skar, J., & Brommels, M. (2006). CCollaboration uncovered: Exploring the adequacy of measuring university-industry collaboration through co-authorship and funding. Scientometrics, 69(3), 575-589.
45. Lundvall, B. (1988). Innovation as an interactive process: From user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation. In: G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory (pp. 349-369). London: Pinter.
46. Lundvall, B.-A. (1992). National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter.
47. Luukkonen, T., Persson, O., & Sivertsen, G. (1992). Understanding patterns of international scientific collaboration. Science, Technology & Human Values, 17(1), 101-126.
48. Mattsson, P., Laget, P., Nilsson, A., & Sundberg, C.-J. (2008). Intra-EU vs. extra-EU scientific co-publication patterns in EU. Scientometrics, 75(3), 555-574.
49. Mayer, T., & Zignago, S. (2006). Notes on CEPII's distances measures. CEPII (Centre d'Études Prospectives et d'Information Internationales), Paris.
50. Melitz, J. (2008). Language and foreign trade. European Economic Review, 52(4), 667-699.
51. Miquel, J., & Okubo, Y. (1994). Structure of international collaboration in science, part II: Comparisons of profiles in countries using a link indicator. Scientometrics, 29(2), 271-297. doi: 10. 1007/BF02017977.
52. Nagpaul, P. (2003). Exploring a pseudo-regression model of transnational cooperation in science. Scientometrics, 56(3), 403-416.
53. Narin, F., Stevens, K., & Whitlow, E. (1991). Scientific co-operation in Europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers. Scientometrics, 21(3), 13-323.
54. Nooteboom, B. (2000). Learning and innovation in organizations and economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55. Peri, G. (2005). Determinants of knowledge flows and their effect on innovation. Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(2), 308-322.
56. Ponds, R., van Oort, F., & Frenken, K. (2007). The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration. Papers in Regional Science, 86(3), 423-443.
57. Santos Silva, J., & Tenreyro, S. (2006). The log of gravity. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(4), 641-658.
58. Scherngell, T., & Barber, M. J. (2009). Spatial interaction modelling of cross-region R&D collaborations: Empirical evidence from the 5th EU Framework Programme. Papers in Regional Science, 88(3), 531-546.
59. Scherngell, T., & Barber, M. J. (2011). Distinct spatial characteristics of industrial and public research collaborations: Evidence from the fifth EU Framework Programme. The Annals of Regional Science, 46(2), 247-266.
60. Scherngell, T., & Hu, Y. (2011). Collaborative knowledge production in China: Regional evidence from a gravity model approach. Regional Studies, 45(6), 755-772.
61. Schubert, A., & Glänzel, W. (2006). Cross-national preference in co-authorship, references and citations. Scientometrics, 69(2), 409-428.
62. Shan, W., & Hamilton, W. (1991). Country-specific advantage and international cooperation. Strategic Management Journal, 12(6), 419-432.
63. Tinbergen, J. (1962). Shaping the world economy: Suggestions for an international economic policy. New York: The Twentieth Century Fund.
64. Torre, A., & Gilly, J.-P. (2000). On the analytical dimension of proximity dynamics. Regional Studies, 34(2), 169-180.
65. Torre, A., & Rallet, A. (2005). Proximity and localization. Regional Studies, 39(1), 47-59.
66. Vuong, Q. H. (1989). Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. Econometrica, 57(2), 307-333.
67. Wagner, C. S., & Leydesdorff, L. (2005). Mapping the network of global science: Comparing international co-authorships from 1990 to 2000. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, 1(2), 185-208.
68. Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036-1039.
69. Zeller, C. (2004). North Atlantic innovative relations of Swiss pharmaceuticals and the proximities with regional biotech arenas. Economic Geography, 80(1), 83-111.
70. Zitt, M., Bassecoulard, E., & Okubo, Y. (2000). Shadows of the past in international cooperation: Collaboration profiles of the top five producers of science. Scientometrics, 47, 627-657.