Factors affecting inter-regional academic scientific collaboration within Europe: The role of economic distance

Scientometrics

Volumn 87, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 63-74

  Acosta, Manuel ^a   Coronado, Daniel ^a   Ferrándiz, Esther ^a   León, M Dolores ^a  

^a Universidad de Cádiz   (Spain)

Author keywords

Academic scientific collaboration; Co authorship; Economic distance; Gravity equation

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952005524     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-010-0305-6     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Boshoff, N. (2010). South-South research collaboration of countries in the Southern African Development Community (SADC). Scientometrics, 84, 481-503.
2. Cameron, C., & Trivedi, P. K. (1998). Regression analysis of count data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Cameron, C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2009). Microeconometrics using Stata. College Station Texas: Stata Press.
4. Hoekman, J., Frenken, K., & Oort, F. (2009). The geography of collaborative knowledge production in Europe. Annals of Regional Science, 43, 721-738.
5. Hoekman, J., Frenken K., Tijssen, R. J. W. (2010). Research collaboration at a distance: changing spatial patterns of scientific collaboration within Europe. Research Policy, 39, 662-673.
6. Hwang, K. (2008). International collaboration in multilayered center-periphery in the globalization of science and technology. Science Technology Human Values, 33, 101-133.
7. Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26, 1-18.
8. Kim, M.-J. (2005). Korean science and international collaboration, 1995-2000. Scientometrics, 63, 321-339.
9. Laudel, G. (2002). What do we measure by co-authorships? Research Evaluation, 11, 3-15.
10. Liang, L., & Zhu, L. (2002). Major factors affecting china's inter-regional research collaboration: regional scientific productivity and geographical proximity. Scientometrics, 55, 287-316.
11. Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
12. Melin, G., & Persson, O. (1996). Studying research collaboration using co-authorships. Scientometrics, 36, 363-377.
13. Okubo, Y., & Zitt, M. (2004). Searching for research integration across Europe: A closer look at international and inter-regional collaboration in France. Science and Public Policy, 31, 213-226.
14. Peri, G. (2005). Determinants of knowledge flows and their effect on innovation. Review of Economics and Statistics, 87, 308-322.
15. Ponds, R., van Oort, F., & Frenken, K. (2007). The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration. Papers in Regional Science, 86, 423-443.
16. Scherngell, T., & Barber, M. J. (2009). Spatial interaction modelling of cross-region R& D collaborations: Empirical evidence from the 5th EU framework programme. Papers in Regional Science, 88, 531-546.
17. Schott, T. (1998). Ties between center and periphery in the scientific world-system: Accumulation of rewards, dominance and self-reliance in the center. Journal of World-Systems Research, 4, 112-144.
18. Schubert, T., & Sooryamoorthy, R. (2010). Can the centre-periphery model explain patterns of international scientific collaboration among threshold and industrialised countries? The case of South Africa and Germany. Scientometrics, 83, 181-203.
19. Sonnenwald, D. H. (2007). Scientific collaboration: A synthesis of challenges and strategies. In B. Cronin (Ed.), Annual review of information science and technology (Vol. 41). Medford NJ: Information Today, Inc.
20. Tijssen, R. J. W, van Leeuwen, T. N., (2003). Bibliometric analyses of world science, extended technical annex to chapter 5 of the third European report on science & technology indicators.
21. Vuong, Q. H. (1989). Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. Econometrica, 57, 307-333.
22. Wagner, C. S., & Leydesdorff, L. (2005). Mapping the network of global science: Comparing international co-authorship from 1990 to 2000. International Journal of Technology and Globalization, 1, 185-208.