Objective evaluation of cervical spine mobility after surgery during free-living activity

Clinical Biomechanics

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 364-369

  Duc, C ^a   Salvia, P ^b   Lubansu, A ^b,c   Feipel, V ^b   Aminian, K ^a  

^a EPFL   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LIBRE DE BRUXELLES   (Belgium)

^c ERASME HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Arthrodesis; Cervical spine; Daily monitoring; Inertial sensors; Movement

Indexed keywords

DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS; INERTIAL NAVIGATION SYSTEMS; SURGERY; VELOCITY;

ARTHRODESIS; CERVICAL SPINE; CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION FUNCTION; INERTIAL SENSOR; MOVEMENT; OBJECTIVE PARAMETERS; QUANTITATIVE EVALUATION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

WEARABLE SENSORS;

ADULT; ARTHRODESIS; ARTICLE; BODY POSTURE; CERVICAL SPINE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; HEAD MOVEMENT; HUMAN; INERTIAL SENSOR; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DISEASE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION; ROTATION; SENSOR; SPINE SURGERY; WALKING; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTION; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGIC MONITORING; PROCEDURES; SPINE FUSION; SURGERY; METHODOLOGY;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; MOTION; MOVEMENT; POSTURE; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; ROTATION; SPINAL FUSION;

EID: 84892816028     PISSN: 02680033     EISSN: 18791271     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.03.006     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bernmark, E., Forsman, M., Wiktorin, C., 2011. Head movements during two computer work tasks assessed by accelerometry. Appl. Ergon. 42, 309-313.
2. Bonato, P., 2005. Advances in wearable technology and applications in physical medicine and rehabilitation. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 2, 2.
3. Bouten, C.V., Koekkoek, K.T., Verduin, M., Kodde, R., Janssen, J.D., 1997. A triaxial accelerometer and portable data processing unit for the assessment of daily physical activity. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 44, 136-147.
4. Castro, W.H., Sautmann, A., Schilgen, M., Sautmann, M., 2000. Noninvasive threedimensional analysis of cervical spine motion in normal subjects in relation to age and sex. An experimental examination. Spine 25, 443-449.
5. Cattrysse, E., Moens, M., Schaillee, E., D'Haens, J., Van Roy, P., 2012. Changed cervical kinematics after fusion surgery. Eur. Spine J. 21, 1353-1359.
6. Cobian, D.G., Heiderscheit, B., Daehn, N., Anderson, P.A., 2012. Comparison of daily motion of the cervical and lumbar spine to ASTM F2423-11 and ISO 18192-1, 2011 standard testing. J. ASTM Int. 9, 36-50.
7. Coley, B., Jolles, B.M., Farron, A., Aminian, K., 2009. Detection of the movement of the humerus during daily activity. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 47, 467-474.
8. Dall'Alba, P.T., Sterling, M.M., Treleaven, J.M., Edwards, S.L., Jull, G.A., 2001. Cervical range of motion discriminates between asymptomatic persons and those with whiplash. Spine 26, 2090-2094.
9. De Beyl, D.Z., Salvia, P., 2009. Neck movement speed in cervical dystonia. Mov. Disord. 24, 2267-2271.
10. de Niet, M., Bussmann, J.B., Ribbers, G.M., Stam, H.J., 2007. The stroke upper-limb activity monitor: its sensitivity to measure hemiplegic upper-limb activity during daily life. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 88, 1121-1126.
11. de Vries, W.H., Veeger, H.E., Cutti, A.G., Baten, C., van der Helm, F.C., 2010. Functionally interpretable local coordinate systems for the upper extremity using inertial & magnetic measurement systems. J. Biomech. 43, 1983-1988.
12. Duc, C., Farron, A., Pichonnaz, C., Jolles, B.M., Bassin, J.P., Aminian, K., in press. Distribution of arm velocity and frequency of arm usage during daily activity: objective outcome evaluation after shoulder surgery. Gait Posture.
13. Favre, J., Jolles, B.M., Siegrist, O., Aminian, K., 2006. Quaternion-based fusion of gyroscope and accelerometers to improve 3D angle measurement. Electron. Lett. 42, 612-614.
14. Favre, J., Aissaoui, R., Jolles, B.M., de Guise, J.A., Aminian, K., 2009. Functional calibration procedure for 3D knee joint angle description using inertial sensors. J. Biomech. 42, 2330-2335.
15. Feipel, V., Rondelet, B., Le Pallec, J., Rooze, M., 1999. Normal global motion of the cervical spine: an electrogoniometric study. Clin. Biomech. 14, 462-470.
16. Fritz, C.O., Morris, P.E., Richler, J.J., 2012. Effect size estimates: current use, calculations, and interpretation. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 141, 2-18.
17. Jasiewicz, J.M., Treleaven, J., Condie, P., Jull, G., 2007.Wireless orientation sensors: their suitability to measure head movement for neck pain assessment. Man. Ther. 12, 380-385.
18. Najafi, B., Aminian, K., Paraschiv-Ionescu, A., Loew, F., Bula, C.J., Robert, P., 2003. Ambulatory system for human motion analysis using a kinematic sensor: monitoring of daily physical activity in the elderly. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 50, 711-723.
19. Prushansky, T., Dvir, Z., 2008. Cervical motion testing: methodology and clinical implications. J. Manipulative Physiol. Ther. 31, 503-508.
20. Salvia, P., Champagne, O., Feipel, V., Rooze, M., de Beyl, D.Z., 2006. Clinical and goniometric evaluation of patients with spasmodic torticollis. Clin. Biomech. 21, 323-329.
21. Schasfoort, F.C., Bussmann, J.B., Martens, W.L., Stam, H.J., 2006. Objective measurement of upper limb activity and mobility during everyday behavior using ambulatory accelerometry: the upper limb activity monitor. Behav. Res. Methods 38, 439-446.
22. Simpson, A.K., Biswas, D., Emerson, J.W., Lawrence, B.D., Grauer, J.N., 2008. Quantifying the effects of age, gender, degeneration, and adjacent level degeneration on cervical spine range of motion using multivariate analyses. Spine 33, 183-186.
23. Sterling, A.C., Cobian, D.G., Anderson, P.A., Heiderscheit, B.C., 2008. Annual frequency and magnitude of neck motion in healthy individuals. Spine 33, 1882-1888.
24. Strimpakos, N., 2011. The assessment of the cervical spine. Part 1: Range of motion and proprioception. J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther. 15, 114-124.
25. Syed, F.I., Oza, A.L., Vanderby, R., Heiderscheit, B., Anderson, P.A., 2007. A method to measure cervical spine motion over extended periods of time. Spine 32, 2092-2098.
26. Theobald, P.S., Jones, M.D., Williams, J.M., 2012. Do inertial sensors represent a viable method to reliably measure cervical spine range of motion? Man. Ther. 17, 92-96.
27. Vega-Gonzalez, A., Granat, M.H., 2005. Continuous monitoring of upper-limb activity in a free-living environment. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 86, 541-548.
28. Williams, M.A., McCarthy, C.J., Chorti, A., Cooke, M.W., Gates, S., 2010. A systematic review of reliability and validity studies of methods for measuring active and passive cervical range of motion. J. Manipulative Physiol. Ther. 33, 138-155.
29. Zijlstra, W., Aminian, K., 2007. Mobility assessment in older people: new possibilities and challenges. Eur. J. Ageing 4, 3-12.