Comparison of the responsiveness of the SF-36, the Oxford Knee Score, and the Knee Society Clinical Rating System in patients undergoing total knee replacement

Quality of Life Research

Volumn 22, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 2455-2459

  Ko, Yu ^a   Lo, Ngai Nung ^b   Yeo, Seng Jin ^b   Yang, Kuang Ying ^b   Yeo, William ^b   Chong, Hwei Chi ^b   Thumboo, Julian ^b,c  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^b SINGAPORE GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Singapore)

^c Dept Medicine Endocrinol Diabet   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Knee Society Clinical Rating System; Oxford Knee Score; Rasch analysis; Responsiveness; SF 36

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVALUATION STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH STATUS INDICATOR; HUMAN; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 84892791125     PISSN: 09629343     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-013-0376-y     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Callahan, C. M., Drake, B. G., Heck, D. A., & Dittus, R. S. (1994). Patient outcomes following tricompartmental total knee replacement. A meta-analysis. JAMA, 271, 1349-1357.
2. Escobar, A., Quintana, J. M., Bilbao, A., Arostegui, I., Lafuente, I., & Vidaurreta, I. (2007). Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after total knee replacement. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 15, 273-280.
3. Lingard, E. A., Katz, J. N., Wright, R. J., Wright, E. A., & Sledge, C. B. (2001). Kinemax outcomes group. Validity and responsiveness of the Knee Society Clinical Rating System in comparison with the SF-36 and WOMAC. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American, 83-A, 1856-1864.
4. Bachmeier, C. J., March, L. M., Cross, M. J., Lapsley, H. M., Tribe, K. L., Courtenay, B. G., et al. (2001). A comparison of outcomes in osteoarthritis patients undergoing total hip and knee replacement surgery. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 9, 137-146.
5. Insall, J. N., Dorr, L. D., Scott, R. D., & Scott, W. N. (1989). Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 248, 13-14.
6. Ware, J. E, Jr., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30, 473-483.
7. Garratt, A. M., Brealey, S., & Gillespie, W. J. (2004). Patientassessed health instruments for the knee: A structured review. Rheumatology (Oxford), 43, 1414-1423.
8. Dawson, J., Fitzpatrick, R., Murray, D., & Carr, A. (1998). Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume, 80, 63-69.
9. Thumboo, J., Fong, K. Y., Machin, D., Chan, S. P., Leon, K. H., Feng, P. H., et al. (2001). A community-based study of scaling assumptions and construct validity of the English (UK) and Chinese (HK) SF-36 in Singapore. Quality of Life Research, 10, 175-188.
10. Xie, F., Li, S. C., Lo, N. N., Yeo, S. J., Yang, K. Y., Yeo, W., et al. (2007). Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of Singapore English and Chinese versions of the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) in knee osteoarthritis patients undergoing total knee replacement. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 15, 1019-1024.
11. Ko, Y., Lo, N. N., Yeo, S. J., Yang, K. Y., Yeo, W., Chong, H. C., et al. (2009). Rasch analysis of the Oxford Knee Score. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 17, 1163-1169.
12. Chang, W. C., & Chan, C. (1995). Rasch analysis for outcomes measures: Some methodological considerations. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 76, 934-939.
13. Quintana, J. M., Escobar, A., Bilbao, A., Arostegui, I., Lafuente, I., & Vidaurreta, I. (2005). Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after hip joint replacement. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 13, 1076-1083.
14. Soohoo, N. F., Vyas, R. M., Samimi, D. B., Molina, R., & Lieberman, J. R. (2007). Comparison of the responsiveness of the SF-36 and WOMAC in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty, 22, 1168-1173.