The International Network of Obstetric Survey Systems (INOSS): Benefits of multi-country studies of severe and uncommon maternal morbidities

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Volumn 93, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 127-131

  Knight, Marian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

multi national; network; observational studies; rare complication; Severe maternal morbidity

Indexed keywords

CHILDBIRTH; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DISEASE SEVERITY; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL NETWORK OF OBSTETRIC SURVEY SYSTEM; MATERNAL MORBIDITY; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; VALIDITY;

MULTI-NATIONAL; NETWORK; OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES; RARE COMPLICATION; SEVERE MATERNAL MORBIDITY;

DATA COLLECTION; DATABASES AS TOPIC; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; MULTICENTER STUDIES AS TOPIC; OBSTETRIC LABOR COMPLICATIONS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS; REGISTRIES;

EID: 84892790866     PISSN: 00016349     EISSN: 16000412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/aogs.12316     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Vernon G, Alfirevic Z, Weeks A,. Issues of informed consent for intrapartum trials: a suggested consent pathway from the experience of the Release trial [ISRCTN13204258]. Trials. 2006; 7: 13.
2. INOSS. International Network of Obstetric Survey Systems (INOSS). 2011; Available online at: https://www.npeu.ox.ac.uk/inoss (accessed 22 November, 2013).
3. Guise J-M, Eden K, Emeis C, Denman M, Marshall N, Fu R, et al. Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: New Insights. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No.191. (Prepared by the Oregon Health & Science University Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-2007-10057-I). AHRQ Publication No. 10-E003. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2010.
4. Fitzpatrick KE, Kurinczuk JJ, Alfirevic Z, Spark P, Brocklehurst P, Knight M,. Uterine rupture by intended mode of delivery in the UK: a national case-control study. PLoS Med. 2012; 9: e1001184.
5. Zwart JJ, Richters JM, Ory F, de Vries JI, Bloemenkamp KW, van Roosmalen J,. Uterine rupture in The Netherlands: a nationwide population-based cohort study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009; 116: 1069-78; discussion 78-80.
6. Knight M, Berg C, Brocklehurst P, Kramer M, Lewis G, Oats J, et al. Amniotic fluid embolism incidence, risk factors and outcomes: a review and recommendations. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012; 12: 7.
7. Knight M, Tuffnell D, Brocklehurst P, Spark P, Kurinczuk JJ,. Incidence and risk factors for amniotic-fluid embolism. Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 115: 910-7.
8. Stolk KH, Zwart JJ, Schutte J, van Roosmalen J,. Severe maternal morbidity and mortality from amniotic fluid embolism in the Netherlands. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012; 91: 991-5.
9. Abenhaim HA, Azoulay L, Kramer MS, Leduc L,. Incidence and risk factors of amniotic fluid embolisms: a population-based study on 3 million births in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 199: e1-e8.
10. Kramer MS, Rouleau J, Baskett TF, Joseph KS,. Amniotic-fluid embolism and medical induction of labour: a retrospective, population-based cohort study. Lancet. 2006; 368: 1444-8.
11. Kramer MS, Abenhaim H, Dahhou M, Rouleau J, Berg C,. Incidence, risk factors, and consequences of amniotic fluid embolism. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2013; 27: 436-41.
12. Kramer MS, Rouleau J, Liu S, Bartholomew S, Joseph KS,. Amniotic fluid embolism: incidence, risk factors, and impact on perinatal outcome. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012; 119: 874-9.
13. Roberts CL, Algert CS, Knight M, Morris JM,. Amniotic fluid embolism in an Australian population-based cohort. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010; 117: 1417-21.
14. Knight M, Lindquist A,. The UK Obstetric Surveillance System: impact on patient safety. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013; 27: 621-30.
15. Zwart JJ, Richters JM, Ory F, de Vries JI, Bloemenkamp KW, van Roosmalen J,. Severe maternal morbidity during pregnancy, delivery and puerperium in the Netherlands: a nationwide population-based study of 371,000 pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008; 115: 842-50.
16. Driessen M, Bouvier-Colle MH, Dupont C, Khoshnood B, Rudigoz RC, Deneux-Tharaux C,. Postpartum hemorrhage resulting from uterine atony after vaginal delivery: factors associated with severity. Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 117: 21-31.
17. Donati S, Senatore S, Ronconi A,. Obstetric near-miss cases among women admitted to intensive care units in Italy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012; 91: 452-7.
18. Schaap T, Knight M, Zwart J, Bloemenkamp K, van Roosmalen J,. Eclampsia, a comparison within the international network of obstetric survey systems (INOSS). Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2012; 119 (Suppl 3): S474.
19. Nordic Obstetric Surveillance Study. NOSS-Nordic Obstetric Surveillance Study. 2009; Available online at: http://www.noss.nu/ (accessed 22 November, 2013).
20. Langhoff-Roos J, Krebs L, Klungsøyr K, Bjarnadõttir RI, Källén K, Tapper A-M, et al. The Nordic Medical Birth Registries-a potential goldmine for clinical research. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013; 93: 132-137.
21. Knight M, Kayem G, Berlage S, Colmorn L, Deneux-Tharaux C, Gissler M, et al. Incidence and outcomes of peripartum hysterectomy: An international comparison using the International Network Of Obstetric Survey Systems (INOSS). J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012; 25 (S2): 9.
22. Kristufkova A, Korbel M, Borovsky M, Knight M,. Comparison of outcomes of perinatal care in Slovakia and the UK. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013; 123: 131-4.
23. Knight M, Pierce M, Seppelt I, Kurinczuk JJ, Spark P, Brocklehurst P, et al. Critical illness with AH1N1v influenza in pregnancy: a comparison of two population-based cohorts. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011; 118: 232-9.