Preoperative predictors of nipple-areola complex involvement for patients undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer

Annals of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 18, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 3123-3128

  Billar, Julie A Y ^a   Dueck, Amylou C ^a   Gray, Richard J ^a   Wasif, Nabil ^a   Pockaj, Barbara A ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; BREAST AREOLA; BREAST EXAMINATION; CONFERENCE PAPER; HUMAN; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MASTECTOMY; NIPPLE AREOLA COMPLEX; PATIENT SELECTION; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COHORT STUDIES; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MASTECTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; NIPPLES; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 83055172923     PISSN: 10689265     EISSN: 15344681     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-011-2008-5     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Greenway RM, Schlossberg I, Dooley WC. Fifteen-year series of skin-sparing mastectomy for stage 0 to 2 breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2005;190:918-22.
2. Patani N, Devalia H, Anderson A, Mokbel K. Oncological safety and patient satisfaction with skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. Surg Oncol. 2008;17:97-105.
3. Wellisch DK, Schain WS, Noone RB, Little JW 3rd. The psychological contribution of nipple addition in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1987;80:699-704.
4. Goh SC, Martin NA, Pandya AN, Cutress RI. Patient satisfaction following nipple-areolar complex reconstruction and tattooing. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011;64:360-3.
5. Jabor MA, Shayani P, Collins DR Jr, Karas T, Cohen BE. Nippleareola reconstruction: satisfaction and clinical determinants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110:457-63.
6. Andrade WN, Baxter N, Semple JL. Clinical determinants of patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107:46-54.
7. Didier F, Radice D, Gandini S, Bedolis R, Rotmensz N, Maldifassi A, et al. Does nipple preservation in mastectomy improve satisfaction with cosmetic results, psychological adjustment, body image and sexuality? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;118:623-33.
8. Rusby JE, Smith BL, Gui GP. Nipple-sparing mastectomy. Br J Surg. 2010;97:305-16.
9. Gerber B, Krause A, Reimer T, Muller T, Kuchenmeister I, Makovitzky J, et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction is an oncologically safe procedure. Ann Surg. 2003;238:120-7.
10. Caruso F, Ferrara M, Castiglione G, Trombetta G, De Meo L, Catanuto G, et al. Nipple sparing subcutaneous mastectomy; sixty-six months follow-up. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2006;32:937-40.
11. Benediktsson KP, Perbeck L. Survival in breast cancer after nipple-sparing subcutaneous mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with implants: a prospective trial with 13 years median follow-up in 216 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;34:143-8.
12. Rusby JE, Brachtel EF, Othus M, Michaelson JS, Koerner FC, Smith BL. Development and validation of a model predictive of occult nipple involvement in women undergoing mastectomy. Br J Surg. 2008;95:1356-61.
13. Lambert PA, Kolm P, Perry RR. Parameters that predict nipple involvement in breast cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2000;191:354-9.
14. Brachtel EF, Rusby JE, Michaelson JS, Chen LL, Muzikansky A, Smith BL, et al. Occult nipple involvement in breast cancer: clinicopathologic findings in 316 consecutive mastectomy specimens. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4948-54.
15. Pirozzi PR, Rossetti C, Carelli I, Ruiz CA, Pompei LM, Piato S. Clinical and morphological factors predictive of occult involvement of the nipple-areola complex in mastectomy specimens. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;148:177-81.
16. Laronga C, Kemp B, Johnston D, Robb GL, Singletary SE. The incidence of occult nipple-areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients receiving a skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 1999;6:609-13.
17. Vlajcic Z, Zic R, Stanec S, Lambasa S, Petrovecki M, Stanec Z. Nipple-areola complex preservation: predictive factors of neoplastic nipple-areola complex invasion. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;55:240-4.
18. Simmons RM, Brennan M, Christos P, King V, Osborne M. Analysis of nipple/areolar involvement with mastectomy: can the areola be preserved? Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9:165-8.
19. Gulben K, Yildirim E, Berberoglu U. Prediction of occult nippleareola complex involvement in breast cancer patients. Neoplasma. 2009;56:72-5.
20. Sikand K, Lee AH, Pinder SE, Elston CW, Ellis IO. Sections of the nipple and quadrants in mastectomy specimens for carcinoma are of limited value. J Clin Pathol. 2005;58:543-5.
21. Schecter AK, Freeman MB, Giri D, Sabo D, Weinzweig J. Applicability of the nipple-areola complex-sparing mastectomy: a prediction model using mammography to estimate risk of nippleareola complex involvement in breast cancer patients. Ann Plast Surg. 2006;56:498-504.