Predictors of HPV vaccination uptake: A longitudinal study among parents

Health Education Research

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 83-96

  Hofman, R ^a   Van Empelen, P ^b   Richardus, J H ^a,c   De Kok, I M C M ^a   De Koning, H J ^a   Van Ballegooijen, M ^a   Korfage, I J ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b TNO   (Netherlands)

^c Public Health Service of the Rotterdam Region   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

WART VIRUS VACCINE;

ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; FEMALE; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PARENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PSYCHOLOGY; RISK FACTOR; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIOECONOMICS; TIME;

ADULT; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAPILLOMAVIRUS VACCINES; PARENTS; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; RISK FACTORS; SEX FACTORS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84892760950     PISSN: 02681153     EISSN: 14653648     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/her/cyt092     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Karim-Kos HE, de Vries E, Soerjomataram I et al. Recent trends of cancer in Europe: a combined approach of incidence, survival and mortality for 17 cancer sites since the 1990s. Eur J Cancer 2008; 44: 1345-89.
2. Bosch FX, Lorincz A, Munoz N et al. The causal relation between human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. J Clin Pathol 2002; 55: 244-65.
3. Walboomers JM, Jacobs MV, Manos MM et al. Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide. J Pathol 1999; 189: 12-9.
4. Munoz N, Bosch FX, Castellsague X et al. Against which human papillomavirus types shall we vaccinate and screen? The international perspective. Int J Cancer 2004; 111: 278-85.
5. Koutsky LA, Holmes KK, Critchlow CW et al. A cohort study of the risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 in relation to papillomavirus infection. N Engl J Med 1992; 327: 1272-8.
6. Woodman CB, Collins S, Winter H et al. Natural history of cervical human papillomavirus infection in young women: a longitudinal cohort study. Lancet 2001; 357: 1831-6.
7. Boot HJ, Wallenburg I, de Melker HE et al. Assessing the introduction of universal human papillomavirus vaccination for preadolescent girls in TheNetherlands. Vaccine 2007; 25: 6245-56.
8. van Lier EA, Oomen PJ, Oostenbrug MWM et al. Immunization coverage National Immunization Programme in the Netherlands. Year of report 2009 [Vaccinatiegraad Rijksvaccinatieprogramma Nederland. Verslagjaar 2009]. Bilthoven: RIVM, 2009.
9. Zwakhals SLN, van Lier EA van. HPV (cohort 1997) by municipality 2012 [HPV (cohort 1997) per gemeente 2012]. In: Dutch National Atlas of Public Health. Bilthoven: RIVM, 2012. (http://www.zorgatlas.nl/preventie/ vaccinaties-en-screening/hpv-cohort-1997-vaccinatiegraadper-gemeente-2012/, accessed 2 September 2013).
10. Brabin L, Roberts SA, Stretch R et al. A survey of adolescent experiences of human papillomavirus vaccination in the Manchester study. Br J cancer 2009; 101: 1502-4.
11. Brabin L, Roberts SA, Kitchener HC. A semi-qualitative study of attitudes to vaccinating adolescents against human papillomavirus without parental consent. BMC Public Health 2007; 7: 20.
12. Brewer NT, Fazekas KI. Predictors of HPV vaccine acceptability: A theory-informed, systematic review. Prev Med 2007; 45: 107-14.
13. Kahn JA, Rosenthal SL, Jin Y et al. Rates of human papillomavirus vaccination, attitudes about vaccination, and human papillomavirus prevalence in young women. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 111: 1103-10.
14. Askelson NM, Campo S, Lowe JB et al. Using the theory of planned behavior to predict mothers' intentions to vaccinate their daughters against HPV. J Sch Nurs 2010; 26: 194-202.
15. Ajzen I. The theory of Planned Behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991; 50: 179-211.
16. Becker MH. The health belief model and personal health behavior. Health Edu Monogr 1974; 2: 324-508.
17. Chapman GB, Coups EJ. Emotions and preventive health behavior: worry, regret, and influenza vaccination. Health Psychol 2006; 25: 82-90.
18. Paulussen TG, Hoekstra F, Lanting CI et al. Determinants of Dutch parents' decisions to vaccinate their child. Vaccine 2006; 24: 644-51.
19. Kaplan KJ. On the ambivalence-indifference problem in attitude theory and measurement: A suggested modification of the semantic differential technique. Psychol Bull 1972; 77: 361-372.
20. Dormandy E,Hankins M, Marteau TM. Attitudes and uptake of a screening test: The moderating role of ambivalence. Psychol Health 2006; 21: 499-511.
21. Hofman R, van Empelen P, Vogel I et al. Parental decisional strategies regarding HPV vaccination prior to media debates: a focus-group study. J Health Commun 2013; 18: 866-80.
22. Brewer NT, Gottlieb SL, Reiter PL et al. Longitudinal predictors of human papillomavirus vaccine initiation among adolescent girls in a high-risk geographic area. Sex Transm Dis 2011; 38: 197-204.
23. Marlow LA, Waller J, Wardle J. Trust and experience as predictors of HPV vaccine acceptance. Hum Vaccin 2007; 3: 171-5.
24. Weinstein ND. Perceived probability, perceived severity, and health-protective behavior. Health Psychol 2000; 19: 65-74.
25. Marteau TM,Dormandy E,Michie S.Ameasure of informed choice. Health Expect 2001; 4: 99-108.
26. van den Berg M, Timmermans DR, Ten Kate LP et al. Are pregnant women making informed choices about prenatal screening? Genet Med 2005; 7: 332-8.
27. Tiro JA, Diamond PM, Perz CA et al. Validation of scales measuring attitudes and norms related to mammography screening in women veterans. Health Psychol 2005; 24: 555-66.
28. Marlow LAV, Waller J, Wardle J. Parental attitudes to prepubertal HPV vaccination. Vaccine. 2007; 25: 1945-52.
29. Stalmeier PF, Roosmalen MS, Verhoef LC et al. The decision evaluation scales. Patient Educ Couns 2005; 57: 286-93.
30. Gilbert LA, Hanson GR. Perceptions of parental role responsibilities among working people: Development of a comprehensive measure. J Marriage Fam 1983; 45: 203-12.
31. Korfage IJ, van Ballegooijen M, Wauben B et al. Informed choice on Pap smear still limited by lack of knowledge on the meaning of false-positive or false-negative test results. Patient Educ Couns 2011; 85: 214-8.
32. Thompson MM, Zanna MP. The conflicted individual: personality-based and domain specific antecedents of ambivalent social attitudes. J Pers 1995; 63: 259-88.
33. General Medical Council. Seeking Patients' Consent: The Ethical Considerations. London: GMC, 1998.
34. Minister of Health. Letter about screening [Kaderbrief screening], PG/ZP 2.848.440. Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports, The Hague 2008.
35. Aiken LS, West RR. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1991.
36. Krawczyk AL, Perez S, Lau E et al. Human papillomavirus vaccination intentions and uptake in college women. Health Psychol 2012; 31: 685-93.
37. Newby-Clark IR, McGregor I, Zanna MP. Thinking and caring about cognitive inconsistency: when and for whom does attitudinal ambivalence feel uncomfortable? J Pers Soc Psychol 2002; 82: 157-66.
38. Nordgren LF, vanHarreveld F, van der Pligt J.Ambivalence, discomfort, and motivated information processing. J Exper Soc Psychol 2006; 42: 252-8.
39. Clark JK, Wegener DT, Fabrigar LR. Attitudinal ambivalence and message-based persuasion: motivated processing of proattitudinal information and avoidance of counterattitudinal information. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2008; 34: 565-77.
40. van Keulen HM, Otten W, Ruiter RA et al. Determinants of HPV vaccination intentions among Dutch girls and their mothers: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2013; 13: 111.