Ineffectiveness of cognitive forcing strategies to reduce biases in diagnostic reasoning: A controlled trial

Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 34-40

  Sherbino, Jonathan ^a   Kulasegaram, Kulamakan ^b   Howey, Elizabeth ^b   Norman, Geoffrey ^b  

^a Division of Emergency Medicine   (Canada)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cognitive error; Diagnostic reasoning; Instructional methods; Medical education

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITIVE FORCING STRATEGY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DIAGNOSTIC REASONING; EDUCATION; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; EMERGENCY MEDICINE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; MEDICAL STUDENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROTATION; X RAY; COGNITION; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; MEDICAL EDUCATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; STATISTICAL BIAS;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); COGNITION; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; EMERGENCY MEDICINE; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84892701803     PISSN: 14818035     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2310/8000.2013.130860     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Graber M, Franklin N, Gordon R. Diagnostic error in internal medicine. Arch Intern Med 2005;165:1493-9, doi:10.1001/archinte.165.13.1493.
2. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, editors. To err is human. Building a safer health system. Washington (DC): National Academy Press; 1999.
3. Kuhn GJ. Diagnostic errors. Acad Emerg Med 2002;9:740-50, doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2002.tb02155.x.
4. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Medical errors: the scope of the problem. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/errback.htm (accessed July 1, 2008).
5. Blendon RJ, DesRoches CM, Brodie M. Views of practicing physicians and the public on medical errors. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1933-9, doi:10.1056/NEJMsa022151.
6. Leape LL, Brennan TA, Laird N, et al. The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II. N Engl J Med 1991; 324:377-84, doi:10.1056/NEJM199102073240605.
7. Croskerry P. Cognitive forcing strategies in clinical decision-making. Ann Emerg Med 2003;41:110-20, doi:10.1067/ mem.2003.22.
8. Croskerry P. Cognitive forcing strategies in emergency medicine. Emerg Med J 2002;19:A9.
9. Croskerry P. Critical thinking and decision making: avoiding the perils of thin-slicing. Ann Emerg Med 2006;6:720-3, doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.03.030.
10. Redelmeier D. The cognitive psychology of missed diagnoses. Ann Intern Med 2005;142:115-20, doi:10.7326/0003-4819-142-2-200501180-00010.
11. Kahnemann D, Slovik P, Tversky A, editors. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1982.
12. Croskerry P. The importance of cognitive errors in diagnosis and strategies to minimize them. Acad Med 2003;78:775-80.
13. Elstein AS. Heuristics and biases: selected errors in clinical reasoning. Acad Med 1999;74:791-4, doi:10.1097/00001888-199907000-00012.
14. Singh H, Petersen LA, Thomas EJ. Understanding diagnostic errors in medicine: a lesson from aviation. Qual Saf Health Care 2006;15:159-64, doi:10.1136/qshc.2005.016444.
15. Sherbino J, Yip S, Dore KL, et al. The effectiveness of cognitive forcing strategies to decrease diagnostic error: an exploratory study. Teach Learn Med 2011;23:78-84, doi:10.1080/10401334.2011.536897.
16. Ark TK, Brooks LR, Eva KW. The benefits of flexibility: the pedagogical value of instructions to adopt multifaceted diagnostic reasoning strategies. Med Educ 2007;41:281-7, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2007.02688.x.
17. Kulatunga-Moruzi C, Brooks LR, Norman GR. Coordination of analytic and similarity-based processing strategies and expertise in dermatological diagnosis. Teach Learn Med 2001; 13:110-6, doi:10.1207/S15328015TLM1302_6.
18. Evans JSBT. Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annu Rev Psychol 2008;59:255-78, doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629.
19. Van Merrienboer JJG, Sweller J. Cognitive load theory in health professional education: design principles and strategies. Med Educ 2010;44:85-93, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923. 2009.03498.x.
20. Mamede S, Schmidt HG, Rikers RM, et al. Breaking down automaticity: case ambiguity and the shift to reflective approaches in clinical reasoning. Med Educ 2007;41:1185-92, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02921.x.
21. Mamede S, Schmidt HG, Penaforte JC. Effects of reflective practice on the accuracy of medical diagnoses. Med Educ 2008;42:468-75, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03030.x.
22. Ilgen JS, Bowen JL, Yarris LM, et al. Adjusting our lens: can developmental differences in diagnostic reasoning be harnessed to improve health professional and trainee assessment? Acad Emerg Med 2011;18 Suppl 2:S79-86, doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01182.x.
23. Sherbino J, Dore KL, Wood TJ, et al. The relationship between response time and diagnostic accuracy. Acad Med 2012;87:785-91.
24. Norman GR, Brooks LR, Colle CL, et al. The benefit of diagnostic hypotheses in clinical reasoning: experimental study of an instructional intervention for forward and backward reasoning. Cogn Instruct 1999;17:433-48, doi:10. 1207/S1532690XCI1704_3.
25. Ark T, Brooks LR, Eva KW. Giving learners the best of both worlds: do clinical teachers need to guard against teaching pattern recognition to novices? Acad Med 2006;81: 405-9, doi:10.1097/00001888-200604000-00017.
26. Eva KW, Hatala RM, Leblanc VR, Brooks LR. Teaching from the clinical reasoning literature: combined reasoning strategies help novice diagnosticians overcome misleading information. Med Educ 2007;41:1152-8, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02923.x.
27. Coderre S, Wright B, McLaughlin K. To think is good: querying an initial hypothesis reduces diagnostic error in medical students. Acad Med 2010;85:1125-9, doi:10.1097/ ACM.0b013e3181e1b229.
28. Eva KW, Cunnington JP. The difficulty with experience: does practice increase susceptibility to premature closure? J Contin Educ Health Prof 2006;26:192-8, doi:10.1002/chp.69.