Post-earthquake evaluation of pipelines rehabilitated with cured in place lining technology using acoustic emission

Construction and Building Materials

Volumn 54, Issue , 2014, Pages 326-338

  Farhidzadeh, Alireza ^a   Dehghan Niri, Ehsan ^a   Zhong, Zilan ^a   Salamone, Salvatore ^a   Aref, Amjad ^a   Filiatrault, Andre ^a  

^a State University of New York   (United States)

Author keywords

Acoustic emission; Delamination; Fracture; Outlier analysis; Pipeline; Structural health monitoring

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC EMISSION TECHNIQUES; MULTIVARIATE OUTLIER ANALYSIS; OPERATIONAL LIFETIME; OUTLIER ANALYSIS; RELIABLE OPERATION; STATISTICAL PATTERN RECOGNITION; UNDERGROUND INFRASTRUCTURE; UNDERGROUND PIPELINE;

ACOUSTIC EMISSIONS; DELAMINATION; FAILURE (MECHANICAL); FRACTURE; MULTIVARIANT ANALYSIS; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PIPELINES; REPAIR; STATISTICS; STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING;

ACOUSTIC EMISSION TESTING;

EID: 84892692010     PISSN: 09500618     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.048     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. EPA. Aging water infrastructure research program. United States Environmental Protection Agency; 2012. < http://www.epa.gov/awi >.
2. Water Resource Adaptation Program (WRAP). United States Environmental Protection Agency; 2012. < http://www.epa.gov/nrmrl/wswrd/wq/wrap >.
3. Yang YJ, Doub S, Latham M. Pipe leak detection technology development. United States Environmental Protection Agency; 2009. < http://nepis.epa.gov/ Adobe/PDF/P1005TBN.pdf >.
4. A.F. Colombo, and B.W. Karney Energy and costs of leaky pipes: toward comprehensive picture J Water Res Planning Manage 128 2002 441 450 (Pubitemid 35307664)
5. NRC. Public water supply distribution systems: assessing and reducing risks - first report. Washington, DC; 2005.
6. E. Allouche, S. Alam, J. Simicevic, R. Sterling, W. Condit, and B. Headington et al. A Retrospective Evaluation of Cured-in-Place Pipe (CIPP) Used in Municipal Gravity Sewers 2011 Edison NJ
7. Dawson D. Cured-in-place pipe: trenchless trends. Composites Technology; 2012. < http://www.compositesworld.com/articles/cured-in-place-pipe- trenchless-trends >.
8. InsituForm Technologies, LLC. Cured in Place Pipe. Missouri, USA, Chesterfield, 1997.
9. C.U. Grosse, and M. Ohtsu Acoustic Emission Testing - Basics for Research Applications in Civil Engineering 2008 Springer Verlag Berlin & Heidelberg, Germany
10. Cooperation PA. Chapter 1 - Introduction. SAMOS AE SYSTEM USER'S MANUAL, Princeton Junction, NJ, USA: MISTRAS, GROUP; 2005, p. 28-32.
11. E. Dehghan Niri, A. Farhidzadeh, and S. Salamone Adaptive multisensor data fusion for acoustic emission (AE) source localization in noisy environment Struct Health Monit 12 2013 59 77
12. Li J, Han Z, Luo H, Cao J. Investigations of the fatigue damage in 16Mn steels by wavelet-based acoustic emission technique. Proceedings of the IEEE 2012 Prognostics and System Health Management Conference (PHM-2012 Beijing); 2012. p. 1-5.
13. L. Chen, D. Lu, and S. Wang Applicability analysis of trenchless corrosion detecting methods on oil pipeline ICPTT ASCE Proc 2011 2099 2108
14. Y.V. Mil'man, H.M. Nykyforchyn, K.E. Hrinkevych, O.T. Tsyrul'nyk, I.V. Tkachenko, and V.A. Voloshyn et al. Assessment of the in-service degradation of pipeline steel by destructive and nondestructive methods Mater Sci 47 2012 583 589
15. J.J.G. De la Rosa, R. Piotrkowski, and J.E. Ruzzante Higher order statistics and independent component analysis for spectral characterization of acoustic emission signals in steel pipes IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 56 2007 2312 2321 (Pubitemid 350268465)
16. R.K. Miller, A.A. Pollock, D.J. Watts, J.M. Carlyle, A.N. Tafuri, and J.J. Yezzi A reference standard for the development of acoustic emission pipeline leak detection techniques NDT&E Int 32 1999 1 8
17. D.V. Leemans Acoustic emission monitoring of A106B pipe steel NDT Int 13 1980 219 224 (Pubitemid 11453991)
18. Q. Ai, C.-X. Liu, X.-R. Chen, P. He, and Y. Wang Acoustic emission of fatigue crack in pressure pipe under cyclic pressure Nucl Eng Des 240 2010 3616 3620
19. S. Davoodi, and A. Mostafapour Modeling acoustic emission signals caused by leakage in pressurized gas pipe J Nondestructive Eval 2012
20. D.L. Merson, and E.V. Chernyaeva Use of the method of acoustic emission for determining the mechanical properties of pipe steels Met Sci Heat Treat 49 2007 272 277
21. A. Kahirdeh, M. Naderi, and M. Khonsari On the role of cooling on fatigue failure of a woven glass/epoxy laminate J Compos Mater 47 2013 1803 1815
22. J. Min, S. Park, C.-B. Yun, C.-G. Lee, and C. Lee Impedance-based structural health monitoring incorporating neural network technique for identification of damage type and severity Eng Struct 39 2012 210 220
23. G. Ramirez Use of acoustic emission to evaluate residual strength in FRP pipes after impact damage Res Nondestr Eval 23 2012 207 220
24. M. Pour-Ghaz, J. Kim, S.S. Nadukuru, S.M. O'Connor, R.L. Michalowski, and A.S. Bradshaw et al. Using electrical, magnetic and acoustic sensors to detect damage in segmental concrete pipes subjected to permanent ground displacement Cement Concr Compos 33 2011 749 762
25. A. Mostafapour, and S. Davoudi Analysis of leakage in high pressure pipe using acoustic emission method Appl Acoust 74 2013 335 342
26. D. Ozevin, and J. Harding Novel leak localization in pressurized pipeline networks using acoustic emission and geometric connectivity Int J Pressure Vessels Piping 92 2012 63 69
27. G. Giunta, A. Lucci, S. Budano, and L. Prandi Pipeline health integrity monitoring (PHIM) based on acoustic emission technique ASME Pressure Vessels Piping Div Conf 2012 1 7
28. G. Giunta, F. Dionigi, A. Bassan, M. Veneziani, G. Bernasconi, and S. Del Giudice et al. Third party interference and leak detection on buried pipelines for reliable transportation of fluids 2011 1 12
29. Bernasconi G, Giudice S Del, Giunta G. Pipeline acoustic monitoring. 7th Pipeline Technology Conference. Hannover, Germany; 2012.
30. Y.A. Khulief, A. Khalifa, R. Mansour Ben, and M.A. Habib Acoustic detection of leaks in water pipelines using measurements inside pipe J Pipeline Syst Eng Practice 3 2012 47 54
31. T.M. Juliano, J.N. Meegoda, and D.J. Watts Acoustic emission leak detection on a metal pipeline buried in sandy soil J Pipeline Syst Eng Practice 2012 121220210914007
32. H.A. Elfergani, R. Pullin, and K.M. Holford Damage assessment of corrosion in prestressed concrete by acoustic emission Constr Build Mater 40 2013 925 933
33. F.A. Travers Acoustic monitoring of prestressed concrete pipe Constr Build Mater 11 1997 175 187 (Pubitemid 127430786)
34. H.A. Kishawy, and H.A. Gabbar Review of pipeline integrity management practices Int J Pressure Vessels Piping 87 2010 373 380
35. M. Shehadeh, J.A. Steel, and R.L. Reuben Acoustic emission source location for steel pipe and pipeline applications: the role of arrival time estimation Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part E: J Process Mech Eng 220 2006 121 133 (Pubitemid 44063748)
36. Lim J, Kaewkongka T. Microcracking in stainless steel pipe detection by using acoustic emission and crest factor technique. IEEE Proceeding, Instrumentation & Measurement Technology Conference IMTC 2007, IEEE; 2007, p. 1-3.
37. Z. Liu, S. Member, and Y. Kleiner State-of-the-art review of technologies for pipe structural health monitoring IEEE Sens J 12 2012 1987 1992
38. A. Farhidzadeh, S. Salamone, B. Luna, and A. Whittaker Acoustic emission monitoring of a reinforced concrete shear wall by b-value based outlier analysis Struct Health Monit - An Int J 12 2013 3 13
39. K. Worden Damage detection using outlier analysis J Sound Vib 229 2000 647 667
40. S. Salamone, M.J. Veletzos, F. Lanza, and J.I. Restrepo Detection of initial yield and onset of failure in bonded posttensioned concrete beams J Bridge Eng 17 2012 966 974
41. P.A. Vanniamparambil, I. Bartoli, K. Hazeli, J. Cuadra, E. Schwartz, and R. Saralaya et al. An integrated structural health monitoring approach for crack growth monitoring J Int Mater Syst Struct 23 2012 1563 1573
42. A. Moustafa, E. Dehghan Niri, A. Farhidzadeh, and S. Salamone Corrosion monitoring of post-tensioned concrete structures using fractal analysis of guided ultrasonic waves 2013 doi: 10.1002/stc.1586
43. P. Rizzo, E. Sorrivi, F. Lanza di Scalea, and E. Viola Wavelet-based outlier analysis for guided wave structural monitoring: application to multi-wire strands J Sound Vib 307 1-2 2007 52 68 (Pubitemid 47337097)
44. X. Zhu, P. Rizzo, A. Marzani, and J. Bruck Ultrasonic guided waves for non-destructive evaluation/structural health monitoring of trusses Meas Sci Technol 21 2010 045701 [12 p]
45. C. Gentilini, A. Marzani, and M. Mazzotti Nondestructive characterization of tie-rods by means of dynamic testing, added masses and genetic algorithms J Sound Vib 332 2013 76 101
46. Bouziou D, Wham BP, Rourke TDO, Stewart HE, Palmer MC, Zhong Z, et al. Earthquake response and rehabilitation of critical lifelines. In: 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Lisbon, Portugal; 2012, Paper No. 511, p. 10.
47. Z. Zhong, A. Aref, and A. Filiatrault Shake Table Tests of Ductile Iron Pipe with Insituform IMain Liner 2012 Buffalo NY, USA
48. Zhong Z, Bouziou D, Wham B, Filiatrault A, Aref A, O'Rourke TD, et al. Seismic testing of critical lifelines rehabilitated with cured in place pipeline lining technology. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 2013 [submitted for publication].
49. R.O. Duda, P.E. Hart, and D.G. Stork Pattern Classification 2nd ed. 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
50. C.M. Bishop Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning 2006 New York New York, USA