Using electrical, magnetic and acoustic sensors to detect damage in segmental concrete pipes subjected to permanent ground displacement

Cement and Concrete Composites

Volumn 33, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 749-762

  Pour Ghaz, Mohammad ^a   Kim, Junhee ^b   Nadukuru, Srinivasa S ^b   O'Connor, Sean M ^b   Michalowski, Radoslaw L ^b   Bradshaw, Aaron S ^c   Green, Russell A ^d   Lynch, Jerome P ^b   Poursaee, Amir ^e   Jason Weiss, W ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c University of Rhode Island   (United States)

^d Jr Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering   (United States)

^e AMRL   (United States)

Author keywords

Acoustic emission; Conductive concrete; Crack detection; Damage sensing; Earthquake engineering; Electrical sensing; Large scale test; Magnetic sensing; Permanent ground deformation; Segmental concrete pipeline

Indexed keywords

CONDUCTIVE CONCRETE; DAMAGE SENSING; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; ELECTRICAL SENSING; LARGE SCALE TESTS; MAGNETIC SENSING; PERMANENT GROUND DEFORMATION; SEGMENTAL CONCRETE PIPELINE;

ACOUSTIC EMISSION TESTING; ACOUSTIC EMISSIONS; BELLS; CIVIL ENGINEERING; CONCRETE PIPE; CRACK DETECTION; EARTHQUAKES; LOCATION; PIPELINES; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

DAMAGE DETECTION;

EID: 79958210008     PISSN: 09589465     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.04.004     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Services TAMC. Chile earthquake and tsunami update. Hawaii: Tripler Army Medical Center. Center for Excellence in Disaster Management and Humanitarian Assistance; 2010.
2. Kim J, Lynch JP, Michalowski RL, Green RA, Pour-Ghaz M, Weiss WJ, et al. Experimental study on the behavior of segmented buried concrete pipelines subject to ground movements. In: Felix WH, Diaz AA, Shull PJ, Vogel DW, editors. Nondestructive characterization for composite materials, Aerospace engineering, civil infrastructure, and homeland security 2009. SPIE; 2009. p. 729419-10.
3. M. Shinozuka, A. Rose, and R. Eguchi Engineering and socioeconomic impacts of earthquakes 1998 Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research Buffalo, NY
4. Eguchi RT. Mitigating risks to infrastructure systems through natural hazard reduction and design. In: Choi C-K, Penzien J, editors. International Symposium on Public Infrastructure Systems Research. Seoul, Korea; 1995.
5. S.E. Chang, H.A. Seligson, and R.T. Eguchi Estimation of the economic impact of multiple lifeline disruption: memphis light, gas and water case study 1996 Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research Buffalo, NY
6. W.-F. Chen, and C. Scawthorn Earthquake engineering handbook. New Directions in Civil Engineering 2002 CRC Press New York
7. Ballantyne D, Chung R, O'Rourke T, Schiff A. Performance of lifeline systems, the January 17. 1995 Hyogoken-Nanbu (Kobe) earthquake, performance of structures, lifelines and fire protection systems. Washington, DC: National Institute of Standards and Technology; 1996.
8. Ballantyne D. Water system performance in the Great Hanshin (Kobe) earthquake. 1995 American Water Works Association Annual Conference. Anaheim, CA: American Water Works Association, Denver, CO; 1995.
9. O'Rourke TD, Grigoriu MD, Khater MM. A state of the art review: seismic response of buried pipelines. In: Sundararajan C, editor. Decade of progress in pressure vessel technology. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 1985.
10. Eguchi RT. Seismic vulnerability models for underground pipes. Earthquake behavior and safety of oil and gas storage facilities, buried pipelines and equipment, PVP-77. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 1983. p. 368-73. (Pubitemid 14458863)
11. Porter KA, Scawthorn C, Honegger DG, O'Rourke TD, Blackburn F. Performance of water supply pipelines in liquefied soil. Fourth US-Japan Workshop on Earthquake Disaster Prevention for Lifeline Systems. Los Angeles, CA; 1991. p. 3-17.
12. Heubach WF. Seismic damage estimation for buried pipeline systems. Fourth US conference on lifeline earthquake engineering. New York: American Society of Civil Engineers, Technical Council on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering; 1995. p. 312-9.
13. Eidinger JM, Maison B, Lee D, Lau B. East Bay municipal utility district water distribution damage in 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. Fourth US Conference on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering. American Society of Civil Engineers, Technical Council on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering; 1995. p. 240-7.
14. Kim J, O'Connor S, Nadukuru S, Lynch JP, Michalowski R, Green RA, et al. Behavior of full-scale concrete segmented pipelines under permanent ground displacements. In: Kundu T, editor. Health Monitoring of Structural and Biological systems 2010. SPIE; 2010. p. 76500U-U-11.
15. Bradshaw AS, daSilva G, McCue MT, Kim J, Nadukuru SS, Lynch J, et al. Damage detection and health monitoring of buried concrete pipelines. In: Oka FMAKS, editor. International Symposium on Prediction and Simulation Methods for Geohazard Mitigation. Kyoto, Japan; 2009. p. 473-8.
16. O'Rourke TD, Gowdy TE, Stewart HE, Pease JW. Lifeline performance and ground deformation in the Marina during 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake. Third Japan-US Workshop on Earthquake Resistant Design of Lifeline Facilities and Countermeasures for Soil Liquefaction. San Francisco; 1991. p. 129-46.
17. R.G. Krathy, and M.G. Salvadori Strength and dynamic characteristics of gasket-jointed concrete water pipelines 1978 Weidlinger Associates New York
18. G. Ayala, and M. O'Rourke Effects of the 1985 Michoacan earthquake on water systems and other buried lifelines in Mexico 1989 Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research Buffalo, NY
19. Sun S, Shien S. Analysis of seismic damage to buried pipelines in Tangshan earthquake. Earthquake behavior and safety of oil and gas storage facilities, buried pipelines and equipment, PVP-77. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 1983. p. 365-7.
20. Prior JC. Investigation of bell and spigot joints in cast iron water pipes. Ohio State University; 1935.
21. El Hmadi K, O'Rourke MJ. Seismic wave effects on straight jointed buried pipeline. Buffalo, NY: Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research; 1989.
22. Palmer MC, O'Rourke TD, Stewart HE, O'Rourke MJ, Symans M. Large displacement soil-structure interaction test facility for lifelines. Eighth US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, San Francisco, CA2006.
23. O'Rourke TD, Bonneau A. Lifeline performance under extreme loading during earthquakes. In: Pitilakis KD, editor. Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer; 2007. p. 407-32.
24. ASTMC76. Standard specification for reinforced concrete culvert, storm drain, and sewer pipe. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2010.
25. ASTMC655. Standard specification for reinforced concrete d-load culvert, storm drain, and sewer pipe. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2009.
26. AWWAC300. Standard for reinforced concrete pressure pipe, steel cylinder type, for water and other liquids. Denver, CO: American Water Works Association; 2004.
27. ASTMD2922. Standard test methods for density of soil and soil-aggregate in place by nuclear methods (shallow depth). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2005.
28. ASTMD2216. Standard test methods for laboratory determination of water (moisture) content of soil and rock by mass. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2010.
29. M. Pour-Ghaz, and J. Weiss Detecting the time and location of cracks using electrically conductive surfaces Cem Conc Compos 33 2011 116 123
30. Raoufi K, Pour-Ghaz M, Poursaee A, Weiss J. Restrained shrinkage cracking in concrete elements: the role of substrate bond on crack development. ASCE J Civ Eng Mater; 2011. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000247.
31. Pour-Ghaz M, Poursaee A, Spragg R, Weiss J. Experimental methods to detect and quantify damage in restrained ring test. West Lafayette. School of Civil Engineering, Purdue University; 2010.
32. A. Poursaee, and W.J. Weiss An automated electrical monitoring system (AEMS) to assess property development in concrete Automat Constr 19 4 2010 485 490
33. I.G. Scott Basic acoustic emission 1991 Gordon and Breach Science New York
34. S. Yuyama, and M. Ohtsu Acoustic emission evaluation in concrete Acoust Emission - Beyond Millennium 2000 187 213
35. S. Puri, and J. Weiss Assessment of localized damage in concrete under compression using acoustic emission ASCE J Civ Eng Mater 18 3 2003 325 333
36. Puri S. Assessing the development of localized damage in concrete under compressive loading using acoustic emission. West Lafayette, Purdue University; 2003.
37. C.S. Ouyang, E. Landis, and S.P. Shah Damage assessment in concrete using quantitative acoustic-emission J Eng Mech - ASCE 117 11 1991 2681 2698 (Pubitemid 21722703)
38. M. Ohtsu, M. Shigeishi, and Y. Sakata Nondestructive evaluation of defects in concrete by quantitative acoustic emission and ultrasonics Ultrasonics 36 1-5 1998 187 195 (Pubitemid 128390645)
39. M. Ohtsu, M. Shigeishi, H. Iwase, and W. Koyanagi Determination of crack location, type and orientation in concrete structures by acoustic-emission Mag Concr Res 43 155 1991 127 134
40. E.N. Landis, and L. Baillon Experiments to relate acoustic emission energy to fracture energy of concrete J Eng Mech - ASCE 128 6 2002 698 702 (Pubitemid 34641844)
41. B. Kim, and J. Weiss Using acoustic emission to quantify damage in restrained fiber reinforced cement mortars Cem Concr Res 33 2 2003 207 214
42. Pour-Ghaz M, Weiss J. Quantifying damage due to aggregate expansion in cement matrix. In: Ideker JH, Radlinska A, editors. Advances in the Material Science of concrete. American Concrete Institution; 2010.
43. E.J. Garboczi, K.A. Snyder, J.F. Douglas, and M.F. Thorpe Geometrical percolation-threshold of overlapping ellipsoids Phys Rev E 52 1 1995 819 828