Acadcmic freedom: Perceptions of academics in Tuzrkey

Egitim ve Bilim

Volumn 36, Issue 162, 2011, Pages 138-148

  Balyer, Aydin ^a  

^a YILDIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Academic freedom; Academics; Higher education management; Research; Teaching

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892683377     PISSN: 13001337     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Akerlind, S. G., & Kayrooz, C. (2003). Understanding academic freedom: The views of social scientists. Higher Education Research & Development, 22(3), 327- 343.
2. Akyuz, Y. (1994). Turk Egitim Tarihi (Baslangigtan 1933'e), Kultur Koleji Yaymlari, istanbul.
3. Alada, A.B. (2003).Turkiye'de Universite Uzerine: Tartigmalar, Arayiglar. Egitim, Bilim ve Toplum, 1(4), 24-31.
4. Arf, C. (2004).Universite Yasasi Nedir ve Ne Olmalidir? Egitim, Bilim ve Toplum, 2(6), 267-273.
5. Barblan, A. (2006). Anew vision of higher education in Turkey, Sabanci Universitesi, Geneva, 1-13.
6. Bjorkman, L. B. (2007). Has academic freedom survived? An interview study of the conditions forresearchers in an era of paradigmatic change. Higher Education Quarterly, 61(3), 334- 361.
7. Bogdan, R.C., & Biklen, S.K. (1998). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods, 3rd edition, Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
8. Buyukozturk, S., Cakmak, K.E., Akgun, E. O., Karadeniz, S., & Demirel, F.(2008). Bilimsel Arastirma Yontemleri, Pegem Akademi Yaymevi, Ankara.
9. Creswell, J.W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey:Merrill Prentice Hall.
10. Cavdar, A. (1995). Turkiye'de ve Dunya'da Yuksekogretim, Bilim ve Teknoloji Raporu Uzerine Gorugler, TUSiAD Yayinlari, istanbul, 95(3), 23-29.
11. De George, R.T. (2003). Ethics, academic freedom and academic tenure. Journal of Academic Ethics, 1, 11-25.
12. Denzin, N.K., &Lincoln, Y.S. (2005). The sage handbook of qualitative research, Third Edition, Sage, Thousand Oaks.
13. Durman, M. (2007). Egitim Bilimleri Bakig Agisiyla Egitim Fakulteleri ve Akreditasyon, Ankara Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Fakultesi Yayinlari Yayin 204, Kargm, T ve Bikmaz, F (Ed.), Ankara.
14. Ercan, F. (2006). Orwell'in Dikey Denetleyici Dunyasmdan Huxley'in Yatay Denetleyici Dunyasma Gegig Surecinde Egitim ve Universiteler. Refleks Populer MuhalifDergi, 2, 20-22.
15. Glaser, B. (1992). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA.: Sociology Press.
16. Guler, A. (1991). Cumhuriyet Donemi Universite Reformlarmda Universitenin Amag ve Fonksiyonlari Uzerine Mukayeseli Bir inceleme, Izmir 1. Egitim Kongre Bildirileri, Buca Egitim Fakultesi Yayinlari, Izmir, 1(2), 295- 303.
17. Guneg, H., & Demirtag, H. (2002). Uguncu Bin Yilda Universiteler ve Toplumsal Kalkmma. Egitim Arastirmalari Dergisi, 7, 33-44.
18. Guruz, K., Suhubi, E., Sengor, A. M. C., Turker, K., & Yurtsever, E. (1994). Turkiye'de ve Dunya'da Yuksekogretim, Bilim ve Teknoloji, TUSiAD Yayinlari, 94, 6-167, istanbul.
19. Guruz, K. (1995). Turkiye'de ve Dunya'da Yuksekogretim, Bilim ve Teknoloji Raporu Uzerine Gorugler, TUSIAD Yayinlari, 95, 3, 333-6.
20. Guruz, K (2002). Yuksekogretimde Bilim ve Egitim, TUBA Bilimsel ve Toplumsal Serisi, 2, 96-103.
21. Hatipoglu, M. T. (1999). Demokratik Universite, Devrimci Cumhuriyetin Egitim Politikalari, Analiz Basim Yayim Aj., istanbul, 257, 273-279.
22. Hatipoglu, M. T. (2000). Yuksekogretim Kurulu Nedir? Abece Egitim ve Ekin Dergisi, 168, 8-9.
23. Hayes, D. (2009). Academic freedom and the diminished subject. British Journal of Educational Sciences, 57(2), 127-145.
24. Henkel, M. (2007). Can academic autonomy survive in the knowledge society? A Perspective from Britain, Higher Education and Development, 26(1), 87- 99.
25. Kayrooz, C., Kinnear, P. & Preston, P. (2001).Academic freedom and commercialization of australian universities: perceptions and experiences of social scientists", The Australia Institute, 37, 1-69.
26. Kayrooz, C. (2006). The role of autonomy in social sciences research the view from UK and Australian universities, UNESCO, 1-12.
27. Kerkhof, van de M. (2006). Repertory grid technique (RGT) integrated assessment, 6(4), 7-34.
28. Marshall, C., & Rossman, B.G. (2006). Designing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication, 4th edition.
29. Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis, Forum: Online Journal Qualitative Social Research, 1(2), 1-10.
30. Mutlu, L. (2000). Yuksekogretimin Finansmani: Yasal Duzenleme igin Oneriler, TUSiAD Yaym No T/2000-10-287, istanbul.
31. Neave, G. (2004) The Bologna process and the evaluative state: A viticultural parable. In Kogan, M. (Ed.) Managerialism and evaluation in higher education. UNESCO Forum Occasional Paper Series. Paper no. 7. Paris: UNESCO.
32. O'Neil, M. R. (2009). Academic freedom as a canonical value, Social Research, 76(2), 437- 450.
33. Palfreyman, D. (2007). Is academic freedom under threat in UK and US higher education? Education and Law, 19(1), 19-40.
34. REGA(2003). KamuMaliYonetimi ve KontrolKanunu, Resmi Gazete, Sayi: 25326, Tarih, 24.12.2003.
35. Rendel, M. (1988). Human rights and academic freedom. In M. Tight (Ed.), Academic freedom and responsibility, Buckingham, UK: SRHE & OU Press, pp. 74-87.
36. Tekeli, I. (2003). Egitim Uzerine Dugunmek, TUBA, 5, 53- 89.
37. Tight, M. (1988). So what is academic freedom? In M. Tight (Ed.), Academic freedom and responsibility, Philadelphia, Society For Research Into Higher Education & Open University Press.
38. Worgul, G.S. (1992). Issues in Academic Freedom. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
39. Yildirim, A., & Imgek, H. (2000). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Arastirma Yontemleri, Segkin Yaymlari, Ankara.
40. YOK (2007). Turkiye'nin Yuksekogretim Stratejisi, Yuksekogretim Kurulu Baskanligi, Ankara, 1-236.