Nanowire pellicles for eukaryotic cells: Nanowire coating and interaction with cells

Nanomedicine

Volumn 9, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 1171-1180

  Kim, Sung Kyoung ^a   Choksawangkarn, Waeowalee ^a   Rose, Rebecca ^a   Fenselau, Catherine ^a   Lee, Sang Bok ^a,b  

^a University of Maryland   (United States)

^b Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

anodic aluminum oxide; cell coating; electrostatic interactions; mass spectrometry; multiple myeloma cells; nanowire; pellicles; plasma membrane; proteomics; transmembrane proteins

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM OXIDE; CELL PROTEIN; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; NANOMATERIAL; NANOWIRE; SILICON DIOXIDE;

ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; CELL COATING; CELL INTERACTION; CELL MEMBRANE; EUKARYOTIC CELL; FIELD EMISSION SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MATERIAL COATING; MULTIPLE MYELOMA CELL LINE; MYELOMA CELL; NANOBIOTECHNOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEOMICS; STATIC ELECTRICITY; SYNTHESIS; ZETA POTENTIAL; ADSORPTION; CHEMISTRY; MULTIPLE MYELOMA; TUMOR CELL LINE; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ADSORPTION; ALUMINUM OXIDE; CELL LINE, TUMOR; CELL MEMBRANE; HUMANS; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; MULTIPLE MYELOMA; NANOWIRES; SILICON DIOXIDE;

EID: 84892675096     PISSN: 17435889     EISSN: 17486963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2217/nnm.13.96     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Mailander V, Landfester K. Interaction of nanoparticles with cells. Biomacromolecules 10, 2379-2400 (2009).
2. Reddy LH, Arias JL, Nicolas J, Couvreur P. Magnetic nanoparticles: design and characterization, toxicity and biocompatibility, pharmaceutical and biomedical applications. Chem. Rev. 112, 5818-5878 (2012).
3. Verma A, Stellacci F. Effect of surface properties on nanoparticle-cell interactions. Small 6, 12-21 (2010).
4. Kobayashi H, Ogawa M, Alford R, Choyke PL, Urano Y. New strategies for fuorescent probe design in medical diagnostic imaging. Chem. Rev. 110, 2620-2640 (2010).
5. Son SJ, Bai X, Lee SB. Inorganic hollow nanoparticles and nanotubes in nanomedicine-part 1. Drug/gene delivery applications. Drug Discov. Today 12, 650-656 (2007).
6. Son SJ, Bai X, Lee SB. Inorganic hollow nanoparticles and nanotubes in nanomedicine-part 2. Imaging, diagnostic, and therapeutic applications. Drug Discov. Today 12, 657-663 (2007).
7. Nie S, Xing Y, Kim GJ, Simons JW Nanotechnology applications in cancer. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 9, 257-288 (2007).
8. Lai ZW, Yan Y, Caruso F, Nice EC. Emerging techniques in proteomics for probing nano-bio interactions. ACS Nano 6, 10438-10448 (2012).
9. Mintzer MA, Simanek EE. Nonviral vectors for gene delivery Chem. Rev. 109, 259-302 (2009).
10. Overington JP, Al-Lazikzni B, Hopkins AL. How many drug targets are there? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.5, 993-996 (2006).
11. Cordwell SJ, Thingholm TE. Technologies for plasma membrane proteomics. Proteomics 10, 611-627 (2010).
12. Speers AE, Wu CC. Proteomics of integral membrane proteins: theory and application. Chem. Rev. 107, 3687-3714 (2007).
13. Chaney LK, Jacobson BS. Coating cells with colloidal silica for high yield isolation of plasma membrane sheets and identifcation of transmembrane proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 258, 10062-10072 (1983).
14. Rahbar AM, Fenselau C. Integration of Jacobson's pellicle method into proteomic strategies for plasma membrane proteins. J. Proteome Res. 3, 1267-1277 (2004).
15. Durr E, Yu J, Krasinska KM et al. Direct proteomic mapping of the lung microvascular endothelial cell surface in vivo and in cell culture. Nat. Biotechnol. 22, 985-992 (2004).
16. Prior MJ, Larance M, Lawrence RT et al. Quantitative proteomic analysis of the adipocyte plasma membrane. J. Proteome Res. 10, 4970-4982 (2011).
17. Mathias RA, Chen YS, Goode RJ et al. Tandem application of cationic colloidal silica and Triton X-114 for plasma membrane protein isolation and purifcation: towards developing an MDCK protein database. Proteomics 11, 1238-1253 (2011).
18. Rahbar AM, Fenselau C. Unbiased examination of changes in plasma membrane proteins in drug resistant cancer cells. J. Proteome Res. 4, 2148-2153 (2005).
19. Li X, Xie C, Cao J et al. An in vivo membrane density perturbation strategy for identifcation of liver sinusoidal surface proteome accessible from the vasculature. J. Proteome Res. 8, 123-132 (2009).
20. Choksawangkarn W, Kim SK, Cannon JR, Edwards NJ, Lee SB, Fenselau C. Enrichment of plasma membrane proteins using nanoparticle pellicles: comparison between silica and higher density nanoparticles. J. Proteome Res. 12, 1134-1141 (2013).
21. Zhang W, Zhao C, Wang S et al. Coating cells with cationic silica-magnetite nanocomposites for rapid purifcation of integral plasma membrane proteins. Proteomics 11, 3482-3490 (2011).
22. Li X, Jia X, Xie C et al. Development of cationic colloidal silica-coated magnetic nanospheres for highly selective and rapid enrichment of plasma membrane fractions for proteomics analysis. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 54, 213-220 (2009).
23. Li X, Jin Q, Cao J et al. Evaluation of two cell surface modifcation methods for proteomic analysis of plasma membrane from isolated mouse hepatocytes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1794, 32-41 (2009).
24. Lu Q, Gao F, Komarneni S, Mallouk TE. Ordered SBA-15 nanorod arrays inside a porous alumina membrane. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 8650-8651 (2004).
25. Wang D, Kou R, Yang Z, He J, Yang Z, Lu Y. Hierachical mesoporous silica wires by confned assembly. Chem. Commun. 2, 166-167 (2005).
26. Millonig G. Further observations on a phosphate buffer for Osmium solutions in fxation. Fifth International Congress for Electron Microscopy. Breese SS Jr (Ed.). Academic Press, NY, USA, 8 (1962).
27. Wessel D, Flugge UI. A method for the quantitative recovery of protein in dilute solution in the presence of detergents and lipids. Anal. Biochem. 138, 141-143 (1984).
28. Kessner D, Chambers M, Burke R, Agus D, Mallick P. ProteoWizard: open source software for rapid proteomics tools development. Bioinformatics 24, 2534-2536 (2008).
29. Edwards N, Wu X, Tseng T W. An unsupervised, model-free, machine-learning combiner for peptide identifcations from tandem mass spectra. Clin. Proteomics 5, 23-36 (2009).
30. Metwalli E, Haines D, Becker O, Conzone S, Pantano CG. Surface characterization of mono-, di-, and tri-aminosilane treated glass substrates. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 298, 825-831 (2006).
31. Perrott K W. Surface charge characteristics of amorphous aluminosilicates. Clay. Miner. 25, 417-421 (1997).
32. Albanese A, Tang PS, Chan WCW. The effect of nanoparticle size, shape, and surface chemistry on biological systems. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 14, 1-16 (2012).
33. Gratton SEA, Ropp PA, Pohlhaus PD et al. The effect of particle design on cellular internalization pathways. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 11613-11618 (2008).
34. Nan A, Bai X, Son SJ, Lee SB, Ghandehari H. Cellular uptake and cytotoxicity of silica nanotubes. Nano Lett. 8, 2150-2154 (2008).
35. Chithrani BD, Chan WCW. Elucidating the mechanism of cellular uptake and removal of protein-coated gold nanoparticles of different sizes and shapes. Nano Lett. 7, 1542-1550 (2007).
36. Elschenbroich S, Kim Y, Medin J A, Kislinger T. Isolation of cell surface proteins for mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Expert Rev. Proteomics 7, 141-154 (2010).
37. Speers AE, Wu CC. Proteomics of integral membrane proteins-theory and application. Chem. Rev. 107, 3687-3714 (2007).
38. Buyukserin F, Medley CD, Mota MO et al. Antibody-functionalized nano test tubes target breast cancer cells. Nanomedicine (Lond.) 3, 283-292 (2008).
39. Hillebrenner H, Buyukserin F, Stewart JD, Martin CR. Template synthesized nanotubes for biomedical delivery applications. Nanomedicine (Lond.) 1, 39-50 (2006).