Optimization of Removal of Phenol from Aqueous Solution by Ionic Liquid-Based Emulsion Liquid Membrane Using Response Surface Methodology

Clean - Soil, Air, Water

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 64-70

  Balasubramanian, Arulmozhiappan ^a   Venkatesan, Sivaramu ^a  

^a ANNA UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

Emulsion liquid membrane; Ionic liquid; Phenol; Response surface methodology; Surfactant

Indexed keywords

ADSORPTION; AQUEOUS SOLUTION; MEMBRANE; OPTIMIZATION; PHENOL; SURFACTANT;

EID: 84892673918     PISSN: 18630650     EISSN: 18630669     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/clen.201200168     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. G. Busca, S. Berardinelli, C. Resini, L. Arrighi, Technologies for the Removal of Phenol from Fluid Streams: A Short Review of Recent Developments, J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 160, 265.
2. J. W. Frankenfeld, N. N. Li, Handbook of Separation Process Technology, Wiley, New York 1987.
3. H. Wang, J. L. Wan, The Cooperative Electrochemical Oxidation of Chlorophenols in Anode-Cathode Compartment, J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 154, 44.
4. P. S. Majumder, S. K. Gupt, Removal of Chlorophenols in Sequential Anaerobic-Aerobic Reactors, Bioresour. Technol. 2007, 98, 118.
5. M. Kallel, C. Belaid, T. Mechichi, M. Ksibi, B. Elleuch, Removal of Organic Load and Phenolic Compounds from Olive Mill Wastewater by Fenton Oxidation with Zero-Valent Iron, Chem. Eng. J. 2009, 150, 391.
6. O. Chedeville, M. Debacq, C. Porte, Removal of Phenolic Compounds Present in Olive Mill Wastewaters by Ozonation, Desalination 2009, 249, 865.
7. D. Manojlovic, D. R. Ostojic, B. M. Obradovic, M. M. Kuraica, V. D. Krsmanovic, J. Puric, Removal of Phenol and Chlorophenols from Water by New Ozone Generator, Desalination 2007, 213, 116.
8. W. Kujawski, A. Warzawski, W. Ratajczak, T. Porebski, W. Capala, I. Ostrowska, Removal of Phenol from Wastewater by Different Separation Techniques, Desalination 2004, 163, 287.
9. K. M. Parida, A. C. Pradhan, Removal of Phenolic Compounds from Aqueous Solutions by Adsorption onto Manganese Nodule Leached Residue, J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 173, 758.
10. S. Senel, A. Kara, G. Alsancak, A. Denizli, Removal of Phenol and Chlorophenols from Water with Reusable Dye-Affinity Hollow Fibers, J. Hazard. Mater. 2006, 138, 317.
11. O. Abdelwahab, N. K. Amin, E. S. Z. El-Ashtoukhy, Electrochemical Removal of Phenol from Oil Refinery Wastewater, J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 163, 711.
12. N. Adhoum, L. Monser, Decolourization and Removal of Phenolic Compounds from Olive Mill Wastewater by Electrocoagulation, Chem. Eng. Process. 2004, 43, 1281.
13. A. Urtiaga, R. Gutierrez, I. Ortiz, Phenol Recovery from Phenolic Resin Manufacturing: Viability of the Emulsion Pertraction Technology, Desalination 2009, 245, 444.
14. H. R. Mortaheb, M. H. Amini, F. Sadeghian, B. Mokhtarani, H. Daneshyar, Study on a New Surfactant for Removal of Phenol from Wastewater by Emulsion Liquid Membrane, J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 160, 582.
15. H. J. Park, T. S. Chung, Removal of Phenol from Aqueous Solution by Liquid Emulsion Membrane, Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2003, 20, 731.
16. Y. Park, A. H. P. Skelland, L. J. Forney, J. H. Kim, Removal of Phenol and Substituted Phenols by Newly Developed Emulsion Liquid Membrane Process, Water Res. 2006, 40, 1763.
17. M. T. A. Reis, O. M. F. De Freitas, M. R. C. Ismael, J. M. R. Carvalho, Recovery of Phenol from Aqueous Solutions Using Liquid Membranes with Cyanex 923, J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 305, 313.
18. F. M. M. P. Correia, M. R. J. De Carvalho, Recovery of Phenol from Phenolic Resin Plant Effluents by Emulsion Liquid Membranes, J. Membr. Sci. 2003, 225, 41.
19. Y. H. Wan, X. D. Wang, X. J. Zhang, Treatment of High Concentration Phenolic Waste Water by Liquid Membrane with N503 as Mobile Carrier, J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 135, 263.
20. Y. S. Ng, N. S. Jayakumar, M. A. Hashim, Performance Evaluation of Organic Emulsion Liquid Membrane on Phenol Removal, J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 184 (1-3), 255.
21. A. Daas, O. Hamdaoui, Extraction of Bisphenol A from Aqueous Solutions by Emulsion Liquid Membrane, J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 348, 360.
22. D. Han, K. H. Row, Recent Applications of Ionic Liquids in Separation Technology, Molecules 2010, 15, 2405.
23. X. Han, D. W. Armstrong, Ionic Liquids in Separations, Acc. Chem. Res. 2007, 40, 1079.
24. A. Berthod, M. J. R. Angel, S. C. Broch, Ionic Liquids in Seperation Techniques, J. Chromatogr. A 2008, 1184 (1-2), 6.
25. T. Welton, Room Temperature Ionic Liquids - Solvents for Synthesis and Catalysis, Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 2071.
26. H. Zhao, S. Xia, P. Ma, Use of Ionic Liquids as Green Solvents for Extractions, J. Chem Technol. Biotechnol. 2005, 80, 1089.
27. M. A. Bezerra, R. E. Santelli, E. P. Oliveira, L. S. Villar, L. A. Escaleira, Response Surface Methodology (RSM) as a Tool for Optimization in Analytical Chemistry, Talanta 2008, 76, 965.
28. S. Ghafari, H. A. Aziz, M. H. Isa, A. A. Zinatizadeh, Application of Response Surface Methodology (RSM) to Optimize Coagulation-Flocculation Treatment of Leachate Using Poly-Aluminum Chloride (PAC) and Alum, J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 163, 6506.
29. M. Rajasimman, P. Karthic, Application of Response Surface Methodology for the Extraction of Chromium(VI) by Emulsion Liquid Membrane, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2010, 41, 105.
30. S. Nosrati, N. S. Jayakumar, M. A. Hashim, Extraction Performance of Chromium(VI) with Emulsion Liquid Membrane by Cyanex 923 as Carrier Using Response Surface Methodology, Desalination 2011, 266, 286.
31. R. K. Goyal, N. S. Jayakumar, M. A. Hashim, A Comparative Study of Experimental Optimization and Response Surface Optimization of Cr Removal by Emulsion Ionic Liquid Membrane, J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 195, 383.
32. - in Tributyl Phosphate, Desalination 2012, 289, 27.
33. M. Ettinger, C. Ruchhoft, R. Lishka, Sensitive 4-Aminoantipyrine Method for Phenolic Compounds, Anal. Chem. 1951, 23 (12), 1783.
34. J. Lin, M. Reddy, V. Moorthi, B. E. Qoma, Bacterial Removal of Toxic Phenols from an Industrial Effluent, Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2008, 7 (13), 2232.
35. J. Li, L. Liang, C. M. Borror, C. A. Cook, D. C. Montgomery, Graphical Summaries to Compare Prediction Variance Performance for Variations of the Central Composite Design for 6 to 10 Factors, Qual. Technol. Qual. Manage. 2009, 6 (4), 433.