A comparison of abundance estimates from extended batch-marking and Jolly-Seber-type experiments

Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 210-218

  Cowen, Laura L E ^a   Besbeas, Panagiotis ^b   Morgan, Byron J T ^c   Schwarz, Carl J ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

^b ATHENS UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS   (Greece)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

^d SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Abundance; Batch mark; Mark recapture; Open population

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892668160     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20457758     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.899     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Arnason, A., and K. H. Mills 1981. Bias and loss of precision due to tag loss in Jolly-Seber estimates for mark-recapture experiments. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 38:1077-1095.
2. Cowen, L., and C. J. Schwarz 2006. The Jolly-Seber model with tag loss. Biometrics, 62:699-705.
3. Freedman, D. A. 2012. On the so-called "Huber sandwich estimator" and "Robust standard errors". Am. Stat. 60:299-302.
4. Huggins, R., Y. Wang, and J. Kearns 2010. Analysis of an extended batch marking experiment using estimating equations. J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Stat. 15:279-289.
5. Jolly, G. M. 1965. Explicit estimates from capture-recapture data with both death and immigration-Stochastic model. Biometrika, 52:225-247.
6. Laake, J. L. 2013. RMark: An R Interface for Analysis of Capture-Recapture Data with MARK, AFSC Processed Rep 2013-01, 25 p. Alaska Fish. Sci. Cent., NOAA, Natl. Mar. Fish. Serv., 7600 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle WA 98115.
7. MATLAB 2012. Version 7.14.0.739 (R2012a). The MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA.
8. Measey, G. J., D. J. Gower, O. V. Oommen, and M. Wilkinson 2003. A mark-recapture study of the caecilian amphibian Gegeneophis ramaswamii (Amphibia: Gymnophiona: Caeciliidae) in southern India. J. Zool. (Lond.), 261:129-133.
9. Pollock, K. H. 1981. Capture-recapture models: a review of current methods, assumptions and experimental design. Pp. 426-435 in C. J. Ralph and J. M. Scott, eds. Estimating the Numbers of Terrestrial Birds, Studies in Avian Biology. Cooper Ornithological Society, Los Angeles.
10. Pollock, K. H., and R. H. K. Mann 1983. Use of an age-dependent mark-recapture model fisheries research. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 40:1449-1455.
11. Roberts, J. H., and P. L. Angermeier 2007. Movement responses of stream fishes to introduced corridors of complex cover. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 136:971-978.
12. Schwarz, C., and A. Arnason 1996. A general methodology for the analysis of open-model capture recapture experiments. Biometrics, 52:860-873.
13. Seber, G. A. F. 1965. A note on the multiple recapture census. Biometrika, 52:249-259.
14. Skalski, J. R., R. A. Buchanan, and J. Griswold 2009. Review of marking methods and release-recapture designs for estimating the survival of very small fish: Examples from the assessment of salmonid fry survival. Rev. Fish. Sci. 17:391-401.
15. Williams, B. K., J. D. Nichols, and M. J. Conroy 2002. Analysis and Management of Animal Populations. Academic Press, San Diego.