Developments in importance measures for riskinformed ranking and other applications

Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, PSAM 2006

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages

  Vaurio, Jussi K ^a  

^a LAPPEENRANTA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFIGURATION CONTROL; MULTIPLE FAILURE MODES; RELIABILITY CHARACTERISTICS; RELIABILITY IMPORTANCE; SAFETY CLASSIFICATION; TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS; TESTING AND INSPECTION; WEIGHTED AVERAGE METHOD;

PIPELINE CODES; PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE; QUALITY ASSURANCE; RELIABILITY THEORY; SAFETY FACTOR; SAFETY TESTING; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84892649490     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Fleming, K. N., 2003, "Issues and recommendations for advancement of PRA technology in risk-informed decision making, " Report NUREG/CR-6813, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC.
2. Shepherd, C. H., Yllera, F. J. et al., 2004, "RISK MONITORS, The State of the Art in their Development and Use at Nuclear Power Plants, " Report NEA/CSNI/R(2004)20, IAEA and OECD NEA WGRisk, Paris.
3. Vinod, G., Kushwaha, H. S., Verma, A. K. and Srividya, A., 2003, "Importance measures in ranking piping components for risk informed in-service inspection, " Reliability Engineering and System Safety 80, pp.107-113.
4. Henley, E. J. and Kumamoto, H., 1981, Reliability engineering and risk assessment, Chapter 10, Prentice- Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
5. Andsten, R. and Vaurio, J. K., 1989, "Advanced Accident Sequence Quantification Techniques Developed in Loviisa 1 PSA, " Proceeding of PSA'89 Intl. Mtg. on Probability, Reliability and Safety Assessment, 2, pp.965-971 April 27, 1989, ANS/ENS, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
6. Andsten, R. S. and Vaurio, J. K., 1992, "Sensitivity, Uncertainty and Importance Analysis of a Risk Assessment, " Nuclear Technology 98, pp. 160-170.
7. Vaurio, J. K., 2001, "Fault tree analysis of phased mission systems with repairable and non-repairable components, " Reliability Engineering and System Safety 74, pp.169-180.
8. Borgonovo, E. and Apostolakis, G., 2000, "A new importance measure for risk informed decision making, " Reliability Engineering and System Safety 72, pp.195-212.
9. Vaurio, J.K., 2004, "Methods and Use of PSA, " YK 1, Basic Professional Training Course on Nuclear Safety, Riitta Kyrki-Rajamäki, ed., 2, Part 10, Lecture 8-9, Publication EN D-80, Lappeenranta Univ. Technology, Finland.
10. Vaurio, J. K., 2002, "Treatment of general dependencies in fault tree and risk analysis, " IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 51, No. 3, pp. 278-287.
11. Kim, K., Kang, D. I. and Yang, J-E., 2005, "On the use of the Balancing Method for calculating component RAW involving CCFs in SSC categorization, " Reliability Engineering and System Safety 87, pp. 233- 242.
12. Vasseur, D. et al, 2005, "Importance Factors and Common Cause Failure: Which Impact on Preventive Maintenance Program Optimization, " Proceedings of PSA'05, American Nuclear Society, San Francisco.