Importance measures in ranking piping components for risk informed in-service inspection

Reliability Engineering and System Safety

Volumn 80, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 107-113

  Vinod, Gopika ^a   Kushwaha, H S ^a   Verma, A K ^b   Srividya, A ^b  

^a BHABHA ATOMIC RESEARCH CENTRE   (India)

^b INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY BOMBAY   (India)

Author keywords

Differential importance measure; Importance measures; Probabilistic safety assessment; Risk informed in service inspection

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; INSPECTION; NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

DIFFERENTIAL IMPORTANCE MEASURE;

PIPELINES;

EID: 0037401974     PISSN: 09518320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0951-8320(02)00270-3     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Ali S., Bagchi G. Risk informed in-service inspection. Nucl Engng Des. 181:1998;221-224.
2. Balkey KR, Closky NB, Phillips JH. Developments on US NRC-approved WOG/ASME research risk informed in-service inspection methodology. An internal report.
3. Vo T.V., Gore B.F., Elizabeth J.B., Simonen F.A. Probabilistic risk assessment based guidance for piping in-service inspection. Nucl Technol. 88:1989;13-20.
4. Vesely W.E. Principles of resource effectiveness and regulatory effectiveness for risk informed applications: reducing burdens by improving effectiveness. Reliab Engng Syst Safety. 63:1999;283-292.
5. Borgonovo E., Apostolakis G. A new importance measure for risk informed decision making. Reliab Engng Syst Safety. 72:2000;193-212.