An integrated modelling tool to evaluate the acceptability of irrigation constraint measures for groundwater protection

Environmental Modelling and Software

Volumn 46, Issue , 2013, Pages 90-103

  Portoghese, Ivan ^a   D'Agostino, Daniela ^b   Giordano, Raffaele ^a   Scardigno, Alessandra ^b   Apollonio, Ciro ^c   Vurro, Michele ^a  

^a WATER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Italy)

^b Organic Agriculture Division   (Italy)

^c POLITECNICO DI BARI   (Italy)

Author keywords

Bayesian Belief Networks; Conflict mitigation; Groundwater protection policy; Stakeholder involvement

Indexed keywords

ARID AND SEMI-ARID REGIONS; CONFLICT MITIGATION; EXPERIMENTAL APPLICATION; GIS-BASED DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; GROUND WATER PROTECTION; INSTITUTIONAL POLICIES; INTEGRATED METHODOLOGY; STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BAYESIAN NETWORKS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; GROUNDWATER; IRRIGATION; WATER QUALITY;

TOOLS;

AGRICULTURAL WORKER; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; GIS; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; INTEGRATED APPROACH; IRRIGATION; NUMERICAL MODEL; POLICY MAKING; STAKEHOLDER; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER QUALITY;

ITALY; PUGLIA;

EID: 84892646212     PISSN: 13648152     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.03.001     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Allen R.G., Pereira L.S., Raes D., Smith M. Crop Evapotranspiration Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements 1998, Food and Agriculture Organization Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56, FAO, Rome, Italy.
2. Alley W.M., Leake S.A. The journey from safe yield to sustainability. Ground Water 2004, 42-1:12-16.
3. Bäcklund A.K., Bousset J.P., Brogaard S., Macombe C., Taverne M. Science-policy interfaces in impact assessment procedures. Environmental and Agricultural Modelling 2010, Springler, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. F.M. Brouwer, M.K. Ittersum (Eds.).
4. Barreteau O., Garin P., Dumontier A., Abrami G. Agent-based facilitation of water allocation: case study in the Drome River Valley. Group Decision and Negotiation 2003, 12:441-461.
5. Becu N., Perez P., Walker A., Barreteau O., Le Page C. Agent based simulation of a small catchment water management in northern Thailand: description of the CATCHSCAPE model. Ecological Modelling 2003, 170(2-3):319-331.
6. Borowski I., Hare M. Exploring the gap between water managers and researchers: difficulties of model-based tools to support practical water management. Water Resources Management 2007, 21:1049-1074.
7. Bousquet F., Le Page C. Multi-agent simulations and ecosystem management: a review. Ecological Modelling 2004, 176(3-4):313-332.
8. Brugnach M., Ingram H. Ambiguity: the challenge of knowing and deciding together. Environmental Science & Policy 2012, 15:60-71.
9. Castelletti A., Soncini-Sessa R. Bayesian Networks and participatory modelling in water resources management. Environmental Modelling and Software 2007, 22:1075-1088.
10. Checkland P. Soft system methodology. Rational Analysis for a Problematic World 2001, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK. J. Rosenhead, J. Mingers (Eds.).
11. Cutts B.B., White D.D., Kinzing A.P. Participatory geographic information systems for the co-production of science and policy in an emerging boundary organization. Environmental Science & Policy 2011, 14(8):977-985.
12. Eden C., Ackermann F. SODA - the principles. Rational Analysis for a Problematic World 2001, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK. J. Rosenhead, J. Mingers (Eds.).
13. European Commission Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC), Guidance on Groundwater Status and Trend Assessment 2009, 84. Guidance Document No. 18, European Communities.
14. European Commission, 2011. Commission Staff Working Paper on Impact Assessment, Annex 5, in Common Agricultural Policy Towards 2020, 2011 SEC(2011) 1153 final/2, Brussels, 20.10.2011.
15. European Commission, 2012. A Blueprint to Safeguard Europe's Water Resources, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. COM(2012) 673 final, Brussels, 14.11.2012.
16. European Drought Observatory Combined Drought Indicator - EUROPE Version 1 Dec. 2011, European Commission - Joint Research Centre. http://edo.jrc.ec.europa.eu/documents/factsheets/factsheet_combinedDroug htIndicator.pdf.
17. European Union Water framework Directive, Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. OJL 22 December 2000, 327:1-73.
18. Farmani R., Henriksen H.J., Savic D. An evolutionary Bayesian Belief Network methodology for optimum management of groundwater contamination. Environmental Modelling & Software 2009, 24:303-310.
19. Gaddis E.J.B., Falk H.H., Ginger C., Voinov A. Effectiveness of a participatory modeling effort to identify and advance community water resource goals in St. Albans, Vermont. Environmental Modelling & Software 2010, 25(11):1428-1438.
20. Garcia-Barrios L.E., Speelman E.N., Pimm M.S. An educational simulation tool for negotiating sustainable natural resource management strategies among stakeholders with conflicting interests. Ecological Modelling 2008, 210:115-126.
21. Giordano R., Passarella G., Uricchio V.F., Vurro M. Integrating conflict analysis and consensus reaching in a decision support system for water resource management. Journal of Environmental Management 2007, 84:213-228.
22. Giordano R., D'Agostino D., Apollonio C., Lamaddalena N., Vurro M. Bayesian Belief Network to support conflict analysis for groundwater protection: the case of the Apulia Region. Journal of Environmental Management 2013, 115:136-146.
23. Gleeson T., Vander Steen J., Sophocleous M.A., Taniguchi M., Alley W.M., Allen D.M., Zhou Y. Groundwater sustainability strategies. Nature Geoscience 2010, 3:378-379. doi:10.1038/ngeo881.
24. Griffon S., Auclair D., Nespoulus A. Visualising changes in agricultural landscapes. Environmental and Agricultural Modelling 2010, Springler, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. F.M. Brouwer, M.K. Ittersum (Eds.).
25. Guimãres Pereira A., Corral Quintana S., Funtowicz S. GOUVERNe: new trends in decision support system for groundwater governance issues. Environmental Modelling & Software 2005, 20:111-118.
26. Hare M., Deadman P. Further towards a taxonomy of agent-based simulation models in environmental management. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 2004, 64(1):25-40.
27. Henriksen H.J., Barlebo H.C. Reflections on the use of Bayesian Belief Networks for adaptive management. Journal of Environmental Management 2008, 88:1025-1036.
28. Henriksen H.J., Rasmussen P., Brandt G., von Bulow D., Jensen F.V. Participatory modelling using Bayesian Networks in management of groundwater contamination. Environmental Modelling & Software 2007, 22(8):1101-1113.
29. Holtz G., Pahl-Wostl C. An agent-based model of groundwater overexploitation in the Upper Guadiana, Spain. Regional Environmental Change 2011, doi:10.1007/s10113-011-0238-5.
30. Knuppe K., Pahl-Wostl C. Aframework for the analysis of governance structures applying to groundwater resources and the requirements for the sustainable management of associated ecosystem services. Water Resources Management 2011, 25:3387-3411.
31. Kosko B. Fuzzy cognitive maps. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 1986, 24:65-75.
32. Llamas M.R., Martínez-Santos P. Intensive Groundwater Use: a Silent Revolution that Cannot be Ignored. Water Science and Technology Series 2005, vol. 51(8):167-174. IWA.
33. Lynam T., Drewry J., Higham W., Mitchell C. Adaptive modelling for adaptive water quality management in the Great Barrier Reef region, Australia. Environmental Modelling & Software 2010, 25(11):1291-1301.
34. Martin de Santa Olalla F., Dominguez A., Artigao A., Fabeiro C., Ortega J.F. Integrated water resources management of the Hydrogeological Unit "Eastern Mancha" using Bayesian Belief Network. Agricultural Water Management 2005, 77:21-36.
35. Martinez-Santos P., Henriksen H.J., Zorrilla P., Martinez-Alfaro P.E. Comparative reflections on the use of modelling tools in conflictive water management settings: the Mancha Occidental aquifer, Spain. Environmental Modelling & Software 2010, 25:1439-1449.
36. Masciale R., Barca E., Passarella G. Amethodology for rapid assessment of the environmental status of the shallow aquifer of "Tavoliere di Puglia" (Southern Italy). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 2011, 177:245-261. doi:10.1007/s10661-010-1631-0.
37. Metcalf S.S., Wheeler E., BenDor T.K., Lubinski K.S., Hannon B.M. Sharing the floodplain: mediated modeling for environmental management. Environmental Modelling & Software 2010, 25(11):1282-1290.
38. Molina J.L., Bromley J., García-Aróstegui J.L., Sullivan C., Benavente J. Integrated water resources management of overexploited hydrogeological systems using Object-Oriented Bayesian Networks. Environmental Modelling & Software 2010, 25(4):383-397. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.10.007, 1364-8152.
39. Montibeller G., Belton V., Lima M.V.A. Supporting factoring transactions in Brazil using reasoning maps: a language-based DSS for evaluating accounts receivable. Decision Support Systems 2007, 42:2085-2092.
40. Moss S., Pahl-Wostl C., Downing T. Agent-based integrated assessment modelling: the example of climate change. Integrated Assessment 2001, 2:17-30.
41. Obeidi A., Hipel K.W., Kilgour D.M. The role of emotions in envisioning outcomes in conflict analysis. Group Decision and Negotiation 2005, 14:481-500.
42. Ozesmi U., Ozesmi S. Aparticipatory approach to ecosystem conservation: fuzzy cognitive maps and stakeholders groups analysis in Uluabat Lake, Turkey. Environmental Management 2004, 31(4):518-531.
43. Portoghese I., Uricchio V., Vurro M. AGIS tool for hydrogeological water balance evaluation on a regional scale in semi-arid environments. Computers & Geosciences 2005, 31(1):15-27.
44. Sandker M., Campbell B.M., Ruiz-Pérez M., Sayer J.A., Cowling R., Kassa H., Knight A.T. The role of participatory modeling in landscape approaches to reconcile conservation and development. Ecology and Society 2010, 15(2):13. (online) URL:. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss2/art13/.
45. Smith H.M., Wall G., Blackstock K.L. The role of map-based environmental information in supporting integration between river basin planning and spatial planning. Environmental Science & Policy 2012, (online) URL:. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901112001141.
46. Sophocleous M. Review: groundwater management practices, challenges, and innovations in the high plains aquifer, USA-lessons and recommended actions. Hydrogeology Journal 2010, 18:559-575.
47. Stave K.A. Using system dynamics to improve public participation in environmental decisions. System Dynamic Review 2002, 18:139-167.
48. Sterman J.D. Business Dynamics 2000, McGraw-Hill.
49. United Nations Water for People, Water for Life 2003, UNESCO-WWAP, Paris, France.
50. Vogel C., Moser S.C., Kasperson R.E., Dabelko G.D. Linking vulnerability, adaptation, and resilience science to practice: pathways, players, and partnerships. Global Environmental Change 2007, 17(3-4):349-364.
51. Voinov A., Bousquet F. Modelling with stakeholders. Environmental Modelling & Software 2010, 25(11):1268-1281.
52. Xia Y., et al. Continental-scale water and energy flux analysis and validation for the North American Land Data Assimilation System project phase 2(NLDAS-2): 1. Intercomparison and application of model products. Journal of Geophysical Research 2012, 117:D03109. doi:10.1029/2011JD016048.
53. Zeleny M. The KM-MCDM interface in decision design: tradeoffs-free conflict dissolution. International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences 2008, 1(1):3-23.