Agree or disagree?: Influences on consensus in personality judgments

European Journal of Psychological Assessment

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 31-39

  Pretsch, Johanna ^a   Heckmann, Nina ^a   Flunger, Barbara ^b   Schmitt, Manfred ^a  

^a University of Koblenz Landau   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Accountability; Consensus; Personality judgments; Shared meaning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892642773     PISSN: 10155759     EISSN: 21512426     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000165     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Ambady, N., Bernieri, F. J., & Richeson, J. A. (2000). Toward a histology of Social behavior: Judgmental accuracy from thin slices of the behavioral stream. In M.P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 32, pp. 201-271). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
2. Ambady, N., & Gray, H. (2002). On being sad and mistaken: Mood effects on the accuracy of thin slice judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 947-961.
3. Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1992). Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A metaanalysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 256-274.
4. Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1993). Half a minute: Predicting teacher evaluations from thin slices of nonverbal behavior and physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 431-441.
5. Biesanz, J. C., & Human, L. J. (2010). The cost of forming more accurate impressions: Accuracy-motivated perceivers see the personality of others more distinctively but less normatively than perceivers without an explicit goal. Psychological Science, 21, 589-594.
6. Blackman, M. C., & Funder, D. C. (1998). The effect of information on consensus and accuracy in personality judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 164-181.
7. Carney, D. R., Colvin, C. R., & Hall, J. A. (2007). A thin slice perspective on the accuracy of first impressions. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 1054-1072.
8. Chaplin, W.F., & Panter, A.T. (1993). Shared meaning and the convergence among observers' personality descriptions. Journal of Personality, 61, 553-585.
9. Costa, P.T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4, 5-13.
10. Funder, D. C., & Sneed, C.D. (1993). Behavioral manifestations of personality: An ecological approach to judgmental accuracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 479-490.
11. Gill, M.J., & Swann, W.B. Jr. (2004). On what it means to know someone: A matter of pragmatics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 405-418.
12. Gordon, R. A., & Stuecher, U. (1992). The effect of anonymity and increased accountability on the linguistic complexity of teaching evaluations. Journal of Psychology, 126, 639-649.
13. Kenny, D.A. (2004). PERSON: A general model of interpersonal perception. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 265-280.
14. Lerner, J. S., & Tetlock, P. E. (1999). Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 255-275.
15. Ostendorf, F., & Angleitner, A. (2001). NEO-PI-R: NEO-Persönlichkeitsinventar - Revidierte Form [NEO-PI-R: NEO Personality Inventory - Revised form]. In W. Sarges & H. Wottawa (Eds.), Handbuch wirtschaftspsychologischer Testverfahren (pp. 409-415). Lengerich, Germany: Pabst.
16. Rozelle, R. M., & Baxter, J.C. (1981). Influence of role pressures on the perceiver: Judgments of videotaped interviews varying judge accountability and responsibility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 437-41.
17. Tetlock, P. E. (1983). Accountability and complexity of thought. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 74-83.
18. Wilson, T. D., & LaFleur. S. J. (1995). Knowing what you'll do: Effects of analyzing reasons on self-prediction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 21-35.