Advanced diagnostic breast cancer imaging: Variation and patterns of care in Washington State

Journal of Oncology Practice

Volumn 9, Issue 5, 2013, Pages

  Gold, Laura S ^a   Buist, Diana S M ^a   Loggers, Elizabeth T ^a   Etzioni, Ruth ^a   Kessler, Larry ^a   Ramsey, Scott D ^a   Sullivan, Sean D ^a  

^a GROUP HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ESTROGEN RECEPTOR; PROGESTERONE RECEPTOR;

ADULT; ADVANCED CANCER; AGED; ARTICLE; BILLING AND CLAIMS; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER REGISTRY; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMORBIDITY; COMPUTER ASSISTED EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST OF ILLNESS; DEMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MANAGED CARE; MEDICAID; MEDICARE; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT CARE; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PUBLIC HEALTH; UNITED STATES; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMANS; INSURANCE, HEALTH; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT CARE; SEER PROGRAM; UNITED STATES; WASHINGTON; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84892598665     PISSN: 15547477     EISSN: 1935469X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2012.000796     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. National Cancer Institute: Cancer Trends Progress Report: 2011/2012 Update. Bethesda, MD, National Cancer Institute, 2012
2. Dinan MA, Curtis LH, Hammill BG, et al: Changes in the use and costs of diagnostic imaging among Medicare beneficiaries with cancer, 1999-2006. JAMA 303: 1625-1631, 2010
3. Katipamula R, Degnim AC, Hoskin T, et al: Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: Effect of surgical year and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol 27: 4082-4088, 2009
4. Bleicher RJ, Ciocca RM, Egleston BL, et al: Association of routine pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging with time to surgery, mastectomy rate, and margin status. J Am Coll Surg 209: 180-187, 2009
5. Pettit K, Swatske ME, Gao F, et al: The impact of breast MRI on surgical decision-making: Are patients at risk for mastectomy? J Surg Oncol 100:553- 558, 2009
6. Smith-Bindman R, Miglioretti DL, Larson EB: Rising use of diagnostic medical imaging in a large integrated health system. Health Aff (Millwood) 27: 1491-1502, 2008
7. Dang CM, Zaghiyan K, Karlan SR, et al: Increased use of MRI for breast cancer surveillance and staging is not associated with increased rate of mastectomy. Am Surg 75: 937-940, 2009
8. Lehman CD, DeMartini W, Anderson BO, et al: Indications for breast MRI in the patient with newly diagnosed breast cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 7: 193-201, 2009
9. Sommer CA, Stitzenberg KB, Tolleson-Rinehart S, et al: Breast MRI utilization in older patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. J Surg Res 170: 77-83, 2011
10. Gold LS, Klein G, Carr L, et al: The emergence of diagnostic imaging technologies in breast cancer: Discovery, regulatory approval, reimbursement, and adoption in clinical guidelines. Cancer Imaging 12: 13-24, 2012
11. National Comprehensive Cancer Network I: Breast Cancer v. 1.2001. Fort Washington, PA, National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 2001
12. National Comprehensive Cancer Network I: Breast Cancer v. 1.2004. Fort Washington, PA, National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 2001
13. National Comprehensive Cancer Network Inc: Breast Cancer, v. 3.2012. Fort Washington, PA, National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 2012
14. Carpenter SG, Stucky CC, Dueck AC, et al: Scientific Presentation Award: The impact of magnetic resonance imaging on surgical treatment of invasive breast cancer. Am J Surg 198: 475-481, 2009
15. Miller BT, Abbott AM, Tuttle TM: The influence of preoperative MRI on breast cancer treatment. Ann Surg Oncol 19: 536-540, 2011
16. Crivello ML, Ruth K, Sigurdson ER, et al: Advanced imaging modalities in early stage breast cancer: Preoperative use in the United States Medicare population. Ann Surg Oncol 20: 102-110, 2012
17. Houssami N, Ciatto S: Design-related bias in estimates of accuracy when comparing imaging tests: Examples from breast imaging research. Eur Radiol 20: 2061-2066, 2010
18. Klein G, Gold LS, Sullivan SD, et al: Prioritizing comparative effectiveness research for cancer diagnostics using a regional stakeholder approach. J Comp Eff Res 1: 241-255, 2012
19. Li X, King C, deGara C, et al: Validation of colorectal cancer surgery data from administrative data sources. BMC Med Res Methodol 12:97, 2012
20. Meguerditchian AN, Stewart A, Roistacher J, et al: Claims data linked to hospital registry data enhance evaluation of the quality of care of breast cancer. J Surg Oncol 101: 593-599, 2010
21. Rayson D, Chiasson D, Dewar R: Elapsed time from breast cancer detection to first adjuvant therapy in a Canadian province, 1999-2000. CMAJ 170: 957-961, 2004 (Pubitemid 38392192)
22. Aetna: Clinical policy bulletin: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast. 2011. http://www.aetna.com/cpb/medical/data/100-199/0105.html
23. Aetna: Clinical policy bulletin: Positron emission tomography (PET). http://www.aetna.com/cpb/medical/data/1-99/0071.html
24. Klabunde CN, Legler JM, Warren JL, et al: A refined comorbidity measurement algorithm for claims-based studies of breast, prostate, colorectal, and lung cancer patients. Ann Epidemiol 17: 584-590, 2007 (Pubitemid 47096709)
25. iCAD: Reimbursement guide. http://www.icadmed.com/support/reimbursement/ documents/ReimbursementGuideforWebsite.pdf
26. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services: Physician fee schedule, 2009. http://chfs.ky.gov/nr/rdonlyres/4fd6f67c-6c97-4061-a9fd-2441467201f2/0/ mdfee2009rev4909r2.pdf
27. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services: Medicare program: Changes to the hospital outpatient prospective payment system and cy 2009 payment rates, 2009. http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/ HospitalOutpatientPPS/downloads/CMS-1404-FC.pdf
28. GE Healthcare: Medicare reimbursement for mammography procedures, 2009. http://www.gehealthcare.com/usen/community/reimbursement/docs/ mammography-cust-advisory-22609edit.pdf
29. Hwang N, Schiller DE, Crystal P, et al: Magnetic resonance imaging in the planning of initial lumpectomy for invasive breast carcinoma: Its effect on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast-conservation therapy. Ann Surg Oncol 16: 3000-3009, 2009
30. Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Leutner CC, et al: Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23: 8469-8476, 2005
31. Sardanelli F, Podo F, D'Agnolo G, et al: Multicenter comparative multimodality surveillance of women at genetic-familial high risk for breast cancer (HIBCRIT study): interim results. Radiology 242: 698-715, 2007
32. Mann RM, Hoogeveen YL, Blickman JG, et al: MRI compared to conventional diagnostic work-up in the detection and evaluation of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: A review of existing literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat 107: 1-14, 2008 (Pubitemid 350179588)
33. Deurloo EE, Klein Zeggelink WF, Teertstra HJ, et al: Contrast-enhanced MRI in breast cancer patients eligible for breast-conserving therapy: Complementary value for subgroups of patients. Eur Radiol 16: 692-701, 2006 (Pubitemid 44149382)
34. Sardanelli F, Boetes C, Borisch B, et al: Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: Recommendations from the EUSOMA working group. Eur J Cancer 46: 1296-1316, 2010
35. Houssami N, Hayes DF: Review of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in breast cancer: Should MRI be performed on all women with newly diagnosed, early stage breast cancer? CA Cancer J Clin 59: 290-302, 2009
36. Kuhl C, Kuhn W, Braun M, et al: Pre-operative staging of breast cancer with breast MRI: One step forward, two steps back? Breast 16:S34-S44, 2007 (suppl 2)
37. Solin LJ, Orel SG, Hwang WT, et al: Relationship of breast magnetic resonance imaging to outcome after breast-conservation treatment with radiation for women with early-stage invasive breast carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol 26: 386-391, 2008 (Pubitemid 351171689)
38. Turnbull L, Brown S, Harvey I, et al: Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: A randomised controlled trial. Lancet 375: 563-571, 2010
39. Peters NH, van Esser S, van den Bosch MA, et al: Preoperative MRI and surgical management in patients with nonpalpable breast cancer: The MONET - randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cancer 47: 879-886, 2011
40. Hulvat M, Sandalow N, Rademaker A, et al: Time from diagnosis to definitive operative treatment of operable breast cancer in the era of multimodal imaging. Surgery 148:746-750; discussion 750-751, 2010
41. Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P, et al: Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: Systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol 26: 3248-3258, 2008
42. Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS, et al: Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 233: 830-849, 2004
43. Kriege M, Brekelmans C, Boetes C, et al: Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med 351: 427-437, 2004