Who is persuasive? The role of perceived personality and communication modality in social multimedia

ICMI 2013 - Proceedings of the 2013 ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 19-25

  Mohammadi, Gelareh ^a,b   Park, Sunghyun ^c   Sagae, Kenji ^c   Vinciarelli, Alessandro ^a,d   Morency, Louis Philippe ^c  

^a IDIAP RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Switzerland)

^b EPFL   (Switzerland)

^c University of Southern California   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

multi modality; online content; opinion videos; personality perception; persuasion; social influence; social multimedia; verbal and nonverbal behavior

Indexed keywords

MULTI-MODALITY; NONVERBAL BEHAVIOR; ON-LINE CONTENTS; OPINION VIDEOS; PERSUASION; SOCIAL INFLUENCE; SOCIAL MULTIMEDIA;

INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

COMMUNICATION;

EID: 84892596506     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2522848.2522857     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. S. Argamon, S. Dhawle, M. Koppel, and J. Pennebaker, J.W.baker. Lexical predictors of personality type. In Proceedings of Interface and the Classification Society of North America, 2005.
2. V. Benet-Martinez and O. P. John. "los cinco grandes"across cultural and ethnic groups: multitrait-multimodal analyses of the big five in spanish and english. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75:729-750, 1998.
3. J. Biel, M. Teijeiro, and D. Gatica-Perez. Facetube: Predicting personality from facial expressions of emotion in online conversational video. In Proceedings of International Conference on Multimodal Interaction, pages 53-56, Santa Monica, 2012.
4. D. B. Buller, B. LePoire, A. R. K., and S. Eloy. Social perceptions as mediators of the effect of speech rate similarity on compliance. Human Communication Research, 19:286-286, 1992.
5. S. Chaiken. Communicator physical attractiveness and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37:1387-1397, 1979.
6. S. Chaiken and A. Eagly. Communication modality as a determinant of message persuasiveness and message comprehensibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34:606-614, 1976.
7. S. Chaiken and A. Eagly. Communication modality as a determinant of persuasion: The role of communicator salience. Journal of personality and social psychology, 45(2):241-256, 1983.
8. P. Ekman, W. Friesen, M. O'Sullivan, and K. Scherer. Relative importance of face, body, and speech in judgments of personality and affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(2):270-277, 1980.
9. B. Fogg. Persuasive computers: perspectives and research directions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 225-232, 1998.
10. B. Fogg. Computers as Persuasive Social Actors, chapter 5, pages 89-120. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 2003.
11. K. D. Frandsen. Effect of threat appeals and media of transmission. Speech Monographs, 30:101-104, 1963.
12. D. Funder. Personality. Annual Reviews of Psychology, 52:197-221, 2001.
13. P. Glick, J. A. Demorest, and C. A. Hotze. Keeping your distance: Group membership, personal space, and requests for small favors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18(4):315-330, 1988.
14. C. L. Kleinke and D. A. Singer. Influence of gaze on compliance with demanding and conciliatory requests in a field setting. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5(3):386-390, 1979.
15. W. Mason and S. Suri. Conducting behavioral research on amazon's mechanical turk. Behavioral Research Methods, 44(1):1-23, 2012.
16. G. Matthews, I. Deary, and M. Whiteman. Personality traits. Cambridge University Press, 2003.
17. A. Mehrabian. Silent message. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1971.
18. G. Miller. Persuasion: new directions in theory and research, chapter On being persuaded: some basic distinctions, pages 11-28. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1980.
19. G. Mohammadi and A. Vinciarelli. Automatic personality perception: Prediction of trait attribution based on prosodic features. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 3(3):273-278, 2012.
20. C. Nass, B. Fogg, and Y. Moon. Can computers be teammates? affiliation and social identity effects in human-computer interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45(6):669-678, 1996.
21. C. Nass and K. Min Lee. Does computer-synthesized speech manifest personality? experimental tests of recognition, similarity-attraction and consistency-attraction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7(3):171-181, 2001.
22. S. Nowak and S. Ruger. How reliable are annotations via crowdsourcing: a study about inter-annotator agreement for multi-label image annotation. In Proceedings of International Conference on Multimedia Information Retrieval, pages 239-248, 2010.
23. S. Park, G. Mohammadi, R. Artstein, and L. Morency. Crowdsourcing micro-level multimedia annotations: The challenges of evaluation and interface. In Proceedings of the ACM multimedia workshop on Crowdsourcing for multimedia, pages 29-34, 2012.
24. B. Rammstedt and O. P. John. Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. in Journal of Research in Personality, 41:203-212, 2007.
25. K. Reardon. Persuasion in practice. Sage Publications, Inc, 1991.
26. C. Segrin. The effect of nonverbal behavior on outcome of compliance gaining attempts. Communication Studies, 44(3):169-187, 1993.
27. C. Werner. Instrusiveness and persuasive impact of three communication media. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 89:155-181, 1982.
28. M. Wollmer, F. Weninger, T. Knaup, B. Schuller, C. Sun, K. Sagae, and L. Morency. Youtube movie reviews: In, cross, and open-domain sentiment analysis in an audiovisual context. IEEE Intelligent Systems, Special Issue on Concept-Level Opinion and Sentiment Analysis, 2013.
29. P. Zimbardo and M. Leippe. The psychology of attitude change and social influence. McGraw-Hill New York, 1991.