CMR assessment after a transapical-transcatheter aortic valve implantation

European Journal of Radiology

Volumn 83, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 303-308

  Biere, Loïc ^a,b,d   Pinaud, Frédéric ^a,b,c   Delépine, Stéphane ^a,b   Grall, Sylvain ^a,b   Viot, Nathalie ^a,b   Mateus, Victor ^a,b   Rouleau, Frédéric ^a,b   Corbeau, Jean Jacques ^b   Prunier, Fabrice ^a,b   De Brux, Jean Louis ^a,b   Willoteaux, Serge ^a,b   Furber, Alain ^a,b  

^a ISTIA Engineering School   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ D'ANGERS   (France)

^c Universite d'Angers   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ D'ANGERS   (France)

Author keywords

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging; Late gadolinium enhancement; Myocardial scar; TAVI; Trans apical TAVI

Indexed keywords

CHROMIUM; COBALT; CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADOLINIUM; STAINLESS STEEL;

AGED; AORTA STENOSIS; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; FEMALE; HEART MUSCLE; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; MALE; METAL STENT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCAR FORMATION; TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

CARDIAC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; CMR; LATE GADOLINIUM ENHANCEMENT; LEFT VENTRICLE; LGE; LV; MYOCARDIAL SCAR; TA; TAVI; TF; TRANS-APICAL TAVI; TRANSAPICAL; TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION; TRANSFEMORAL;

AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; ARTIFACTS; CICATRIX; FEMALE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, CINE; MALE; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84892590103     PISSN: 0720048X     EISSN: 18727727     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.11.007     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. A. Cribier, H. Eltchaninoff, and A. Bash et al. Percutaneous transcatheter implantation of an aortic valve prosthesis for calcific aortic stenosis: first human case description Circulation 106 2002 3006 3008
2. M.B. Leon, C.R. Smith, and M. Mack et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery N Engl J Med 363 2010 1597 1607 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1008232
3. C.R. Smith, M.B. Leon, and M.J. Mack et al. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients N Engl J Med 364 2011 2187 2198
4. M. Gilard, H. Eltchaninoff, and B. Iung et al. Registry of transcatheter aortic-valve implantation in high-risk patients N Engl J Med 366 2012 1705 1715
5. J. Rodes-Cabau, M. Gutierrez, and R. Bagur et al. Incidence, predictive factors, and prognostic value of myocardial injury following uncomplicated transcatheter aortic valve implantation J Am Coll Cardiol 57 2011 1988 1999
6. M. Thomas, G. Schymik, and T. Walther et al. Thirty-day results of the SAPIEN aortic Bioprosthesis European Outcome (SOURCE) Registry: a European registry of transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the Edwards SAPIEN valve Circulation 122 2010 62 69
7. J. Higgins, J. Ye, and K.H. Humphries et al. Early clinical outcomes after transapical aortic valve implantation: a propensity-matched comparison with conventional aortic valve replacement J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 142 2011 e47 e52
8. A. Unbehaun, M. Pasic, and T. Drews et al. Analysis of survival in 300 high-risk patients up to 2.5 years after transapical aortic valve implantation Ann Thorac Surg 92 2011 1315 1323
9. P. Wenaweser, T. Pilgrim, and N. Roth et al. Clinical outcome and predictors for adverse events after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the use of different devices and access routes Am Heart J 161 2013 1114 1124
10. J.N. Cohn, R. Ferrari, and N. Sharpe Cardiac remodeling - concepts and clinical implications: a consensus paper from an international forum on cardiac remodeling. Behalf of an International Forum on Cardiac Remodeling J Am Coll Cardiol 35 2000 569 582
11. F. Buendia, O. Cano, and J.M. Sanchez-Gomez et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5T in patients with cardiac rhythm devices Europace 13 2011 533 538
12. T. Walther, P. Simon, and T. Dewey et al. Transapical minimally invasive aortic valve implantation: multicenter experience Circulation 116 2007 I240 I245
13. M.D. Cerqueira, N.J. Weissman, and V. Dilsizian et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association Circulation 105 2002 539 542
14. D. Himbert, F. Descoutures, and N. Al-Attar et al. Results of transfemoral or transapical aortic valve implantation following a uniform assessment in high-risk patients with aortic stenosis J Am Coll Cardiol 54 2009 303 311
15. J. Rodes-Cabau, J.G. Webb, and A. Cheung et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for the treatment of severe symptomatic aortic stenosis in patients at very high or prohibitive surgical risk: acute and late outcomes of the multicenter Canadian experience J Am Coll Cardiol 55 2010 1080 1090
16. N. Mewton, C.Y. Liu, P. Croisille, D. Bluemke, and J.A. Lima Assessment of myocardial fibrosis with cardiovascular magnetic resonance J Am Coll Cardiol 57 2011 891 903
17. O. Bondarenko, A.M. Beek, and M.B. Hofman et al. Standardizing the definition of hyperenhancement in the quantitative assessment of infarct size and myocardial viability using delayed contrast-enhanced CMR J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 7 2005 481 485
18. E. Wu, J.T. Ortiz, and P. Tejedor et al. Infarct size by contrast enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance is a stronger predictor of outcomes than left ventricular ejection fraction or end-systolic volume index: prospective cohort study Heart 94 2008 730 736
19. T.A. Fairbairn, C.D. Steadman, and A.N. Mather et al. Assessment of valve haemodynamics, reverse ventricular remodelling and myocardial fibrosis following transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared to surgical aortic valve replacement: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study Heart 99 2013 1185 1191