Guided bone regeneration using chitosan-collagen membranes in dog dehiscence-type defect model

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Volumn 72, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 304.e1-304.e14

  Li, Xiaojing ^a   Wang, Xinmu ^b   Zhao, Tengfei ^c   Gao, Bo ^a   Miao, Yuwen ^a   Zhang, Dandan ^a   Dong, Yan ^a  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (China)

^b HANGZHOU FIRST PEOPLE'S HOSPITAL   (China)

^c THE SECOND AFFILIATED HOSPITAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHITOSAN; COLLAGEN;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BONE; BONE DEFECT; BONE REGENERATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; GUIDED BONE REGENERATION; HEALING; HISTOMETRY; IMPLANT; MEMBRANE; MOLAR TOOTH; NONHUMAN; OSSIFICATION; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RADIODIAGNOSIS;

ANIMALS; BONE REGENERATION; CHITOSAN; COLLAGEN; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DOGS; GUIDED TISSUE REGENERATION; MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL; OSSEOINTEGRATION; RANDOM ALLOCATION; SURGICAL WOUND DEHISCENCE; TOOTH EXTRACTION; TOOTH SOCKET;

EID: 84892566078     PISSN: 02782391     EISSN: 15315053     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.09.042     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. T. Hockers, D. Abensur, and P. Valentini et al. The combined use of bioresorbable membranes and xenografts or autografts in the treatment of bone defects around implants: A study in beagle dogs Clin Oral Implant Res 10 1999 487
2. C.H. HÓmmerle, and R.E. Jung Bone augmentation by means of barrier membranes Peridontol 33 2003 36
3. F.P. Strietzel, P. Khongkhunthian, and R. Khattiya et al. Healing pattern of bone defects covered by different membrane types - A histologic study in the porcine mandible J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 78 2006 35
4. J.S. Lee, S.H. Ko, and Y.T. Kim et al. Guided bone regeneration using cyanoacrylate-combined calcium phosphate in a dehiscence defect: A histologic study in dogs J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70 2012 2070
5. F.V. Ribeiro, F.F. Suaid, and K.G. Ruiz et al. Effect of autologous bone marrow-derived cells associated with guided bone regeneration or not in the treatment of peri-implant defects Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 41 2012 121
6. B.A. Al-Hazmi, K.S. Al-Hamdan, and A. Al-Rasheed et al. Efficacy of using PDGF and xenograft with or without collagen membrane for bone regeneration around immediate implants with induced dehiscence-type defects: A microcomputed tomographic study in dogs J Periodontol 84 2013 371
7. C. Dahlin, M. Simion, and N. Hatano Long-term follow-up on soft and hard tissue levels following guided bone regeneration treatment in combination with a xenogeneic filling material: A 5-year prospective clinical study Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 12 2010 263
8. F. Schwarz, I. Mihatovic, and V. Golubovic et al. Influence of two barrier membranes on staged guided bone regeneration and osseointegration of titanium implants in dogs: Part 1. Augmentation using bone graft substitutes and autogenous bone Clin Oral Implants Res 23 2012 83
9. R. Zambon, N. Mardas, and A. Horvath et al. The effect of loading in regenerated bone in dehiscence defects following a combined approach of bone grafting and GBR Clin Oral Implants Res 23 2012 591
10. M. Clementini, A. Morlupi, and L. Canullo et al. Success rate of dental implants inserted in horizontal and vertical guided bone regenerated areas: A systematic review Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 41 2012 847
11. R. Parodi, G. Carusi, G. Santarelli, and F. Nanni Implant placement in large edentulous ridges expanded by GBR using a bioresorbable collagen membrane Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 18 1998 266
12. C.H. HÓmmerle, and N.P. Lang Single stage surgery combining transmucosal implant placement with guided bone regeneration and bioresorbable materials Clin Oral Implants Res 12 2001 9
13. A. Friedmann, K. Gissel, and M. Soudan et al. Randomized controlled trial on lateral augmentation using two collagen membranes: Morphometric results on mineralized tissue compound J Clin Periodontol 38 2011 677
14. L. Ohayon Ridge enlargement using deproteinized bovine bone and a bioresorbable collagen membrane: A tomodensitometric, histologic, and histomorphometric analysis Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 31 2011 237
15. J. Behring, R. Junker, and X.F. Walboomers et al. Toward guided tissue and bone regeneration: Morphology, attachment, proliferation, and migration of cells cultured on collagen barrier membranes: A systematic review Odontology 96 2008 1
16. O. Moses, S. Pitaru, Z. Artzi, and C.E. Nemcovsky Healing of dehiscence-type defects in implants placed together with different barrier membranes: A comparative clinical study Clin Oral Implants Res 16 2005 210
17. R. Jayakumar, D. Menon, and K. Manzoor et al. Biomedical applications of chitin and chitosan based nanomaterials - A short review Carbohydr Polym 82 2010 227
18. A. Francesko, and T. Tzanov Chitin, chitosan and derivatives for wound healing and tissue engineering Adv Biochem Engin/Biotechnol 125 2010 1
19. A. Di Martino, M. Sittinger, and M.V. Risbud Chitosan: A versatile biopolymer for orthopaedic tissue-engineering Biomaterials 26 2005 5983
20. B.K. Park, and M.M. Kim Applications of chitin and its derivatives in biological medicine Int J Mol Sci 11 2010 5152
21. K. Tomihata, and Y. Ikada In vitro and in vivo degradation of films of chitin and its deacetylated derivatives Biomaterials 18 1997 567
22. B.K. Choi, K.Y. Kim, and Y.J. Yoo et al. In vitro antimicrobial activity of a chitooligosaccharide mixture against Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans and Streptococcus mutans Int J Antimicrob Agents 18 2001 553
23. T. Yu, H.Y. Li, and X.D. Zheng Synergistic effect of chitosan and Cryptococcus laurentiion inhibition of Penicillium expansum infections Int J Food Microbiol 114 2007 261
24. R. Valentine, T. Athanasiadis, and S. Moratti et al. The efficacy of a novel chitosan gel on hemostasis and wound healing after endoscopic sinus surgery Am J Rhinol Allergy 24 2010 70
25. T. Kawai, T. Yamada, and A. Yasukawa et al. Biological fixation of fibrous materials to bone using chitin/chitosan as a bone formation accelerator J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 88B 2009 264
26. C. Xu, C. Lei, and L. Meng et al. Chitosan as a barrier membrane material in periodontal tissue regeneration J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 100B 2012 1435
27. S. Kung, H. Devlin, and E. Fu et al. The osteoinductive effect of chitosan-collagen composites around pure titanium implant surfaces in rats J Periodontal Res 46 2011 126
28. E.K. Pang, J.W. Paik, and S.K. Kim et al. Effects of chitosan on human periodontal ligament fibroblasts in vitro and on bone formation in rat calvarial defects J Periodontol 76 2005 1526
29. J.S. Park, S.H. Choi, and I.S. Moon et al. Eight week histological analysis on the effect of chitosan on surgically created one-wall intrabony defects in beagle dogs J Clin Periodontol 30 2003 443
30. P. Arpornmaeklong, N. Suwatwirote, P. Pripatnanont, and K. Oungbho Growth and differentiation of mouse osteoblasts on chitosan-collagen sponges Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 36 2007 328
31. F. Schwarz, N. Sahm, and J. Becker Impact of the outcome of guided bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects on the long-term stability of peri-implant health: Clinical observations at 4 years Clin Oral Implants Res 23 2012 191
32. F. Schwarz, M. Herten, and M. Sager et al. Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at chemically modified (SLActive) and conventional SLA titanium implants: A pilot study in dogs J Clin Periodontol 34 2007 78
33. ®) and conventional SLA titanium implants: An immunohistochemical study in dogs J Clin Periodontol 35 2008 64
34. F. Schwarz, D. Rothamel, and M. Herten et al. Immunohistochemical characterization of guided bone regeneration at a dehiscence-type defect using different barrier membranes: An experimental study in dogs Clin Oral Implants Res 19 2008 402
35. F. Schwarz, M. Sager, and I. Kadelka et al. Influence of titanium implant surface characteristics on bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects: An experimental study in dogs J Clin Periodontol 37 2010 466
36. O.S. Hanisch, R.G. Sorensen, and A. Kinoshita et al. Effect of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in dehiscence defects with non-submerged immediate implants: an experimental study in Cynomolgus monkeys J Periodontol 74 2003 648
37. M. Chiapasco, M. Zaniboni, and M. Boisco Augmentation procedures for the rehabilitation of deficient edentulous ridges with oral implants Clin Oral Implants Res 17 Suppl 2 2006 136
38. A. Stavropoulos, L. Kostopoulos, and N. Mardas et al. Deproteinized bovine bone used as an adjunct to guided bone augmentation: An experimental study in the rat Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 3 2001 156
39. 1 analog methacrylate composite J Clin Periodontol 26 1999 381
40. T.J. Oh, S.J. Meraw, and E.J. Lee et al. Comparative analysis of collagen membranes for the treatment of implant dehiscence defects Clin Oral Implants Res 14 2003 80
41. R.E. Jung, G. Lecloux, and E. Rompen et al. A feasibility study evaluating an in situ formed synthetic biodegradable membrane for guided bone regeneration in dogs Clin Oral Implants Res 20 2009 151
42. J. Liuyun, L. Yubao, and X. Chengdong A novel composite membrane of chitosan-carboxymethyl cellulose polyelectrolyte complex membrane filled with nano-hydroxyapatite: I. Preparation and properties J Mater Sci Mater Med 20 2009 1645
43. M.B. Harzeler, R.J. Kohal, and J. Naghshbandi et al. Evaluation of a new bioresorbable barrier to facilitate guided bone regeneration around exposed implant threads An experimental study in the monkey Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 27 1998 315