The teaching of strategies to identify and summarize the important information in texts. Consecuences for construction of situation model;La enseñanza de estrategias para identificar y reducir la información importante de un texto. Consecuencias para la construcción del modelo de la situación

Infancia y Aprendizaje

Volumn 21, Issue 83, 1998, Pages 29-57

  Orrantia, José ^a   Rosales, Javier ^a   Sánchez, Emilio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALAMANCA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Reading comprehension; situation model; textual representation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892510425     PISSN: 02103702     EISSN: 15784126     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1174/021037098760403460     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Armbruster, B. B., Anderson, T. H., & Ostertag, J., (1987). Does text structure/summarization instruction facilitate learning expository text? Reading Research Quarterly, XXII, 331–346.
2. Armbruster, B. B., Anderson, T. H., & Ostertag, J., (1989). Teaching text structure to improve reading and writing. The Reading Teacher, 43 (2), 130–137.
3. Baumann, J. F., (1986). The direct instruction of main idea comprehension ability. En J. F., Baumann (Ed.), Teaching Main Idea Comprehension. Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association.
4. Beck, I. L., Mckeown, M. G., Sinatra, G. M., & Loxterman, J. A., (1991). Revising social studies text from a text-processing perspective: Evidence of improved comprehensibility. Reading Research Quaterly, 27, 251–276.
5. Britton, B. K., Glynn, S. M., & Smith (1982). Cognitive demands of processing expository text: A cognitive workhbench model. En B. K., Britton & J. B., Black (Eds.), Understanding expository text. Hilldales, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Britton, B. K., & Gulgoz, S., (1991). Using Kintsch's model to improve instructional text: Effects of inference calls on recall and cognitive structures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 329–345.
7. Brown A. L., Day, J. C., & Jones, R. S., (1983).The development of plans for sumarizing texts. Child Development, 54, 968–979.
8. Brown, A. L., & Day, J. D., (1983). Macrorules for summarizing texts: The development of expertise. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verebal Behavior, 22, 1–14.
9. Carriedo, N., (1996). Consideraciones metodológicas sobre los programas de instrucción desarrollados para mejorar la comprensión de las ideas principales y su eficacia. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 73, 87–107.
10. Chi, M. T. H., De Leeuw, N., Chiu, M., & Lavancher, C., (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding.Cognitive Science, 18, 439–477.
11. Cunningham, J. W., & Moore, D. W., (1986). The Confused World of Main Idea. En J. F., Baumann (Ed.), Teaching Main Idea Comprehension. Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association.
12. Englert, C.S., & Hiebert, E.H., (1985). Children's developing awareness of text structure in expository materials. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 65–74.
13. Fitzgeral, J., & Teasley, A., (1986). Effects of instruction in narrative structure on children's writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78 (6), 424–433.
14. Frederiksen, C. H., (1975). Adquisition of semantic information from discourse: Effects of repeated exposures. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verebal Behavior, 14, 158–169.
15. Golden, J., Haslet, B., & Gauntt, H., (1988). Structure and Content in Eighth-Graders' Summary Essays. Discourse Processes, 11, 139–162.
16. Gordon, C. J., (1989). Teaching Narrative Text Structure: A Proces Aproach to Reading and Writing. En Muth, K. D., (Ed.), Children's Comprehension of Text. Research into Practice. Newark, DE: International Reading Associaton.
17. Hare, V. C., & Borchardt, K. M., (1984). Direct instruction of summarization skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 62–78.
18. Hare, V. C., Rabinowitz, M., & Schieble, K. M., (1989). Text effects on main idea comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 72–88.
19. Kieras, D. E., (1980). Initial mention as a signal to thematic content in technical passages. Memory and Cognition, 8, 345–353.
20. Kieras, D. E., (1981). Topicalization effects in cued recall of technical prosa. Memory and Cognition, 9, 541–549.
21. Kieras, D. E., (1985). Thematic processes in the comprehension of technical prose. En B. K., Britton & J. B., Black (Ed.), Understanding expository text. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
22. Kintsch, E., & Kintsch, W., (1995). Strategies to promote active learning from text: Individual differences in background knowledge. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 54, 141–151.
23. Kintsch, W., (1974). The representation of meaning in memory. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
24. Kintsch, W., (1988). The use of knowledge in discourse processing: A construction-integration model. Psychological Rewiev, 95, 163–182.
25. Kintsch, W., (1994). Text comprehension, memory, and learning. American Psychologist, 49, 292–303.
26. Kintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T. A., (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394.
27. Loman, N. L., & Mayer, R. E., (1983). Signaling techniques that increase the understandability of expository prose. Journal Educational Psychology, 75, 402–412.
28. Lorch, R. F., Lorch, E. P., & Mathews, P. D., (1985). On-line processing of the topic structure of a text. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 350–362.
29. Mannes, S., & Kintsch, W., (1987). Knowledge organization and text organization. Cognition and Instruction, 4, 91–115.
30. Mcgee, L. M., (1982).Awareness of text structure: Effects on chlindren's recall of expository text. Reading Research Quarterly, 17, 581–590
31. Mcnamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W., (1996). Are good text always better? Text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 1–43.
32. Meyer, B. J. F., (1975). The organization of prose and its effects on memory. Amsterdan: Horth-Holland.
33. Meyer, B. J. F., (1984). Text dimensions and cognitive processing. En H., Mandl, N., Stein & T., Trabasso (Eds.), Learning and comprehension of text. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Meyer, B. J. F., (1985). Prose analysis: purposes, procedures and problems. En B. K., Britton & J. B., Black (Eds.), Understanding expository text. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
35. Meyer, B. J. F., & Rice, E., (1984). The structure of text. En D. R., Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research. New York: Longman.
36. Meyer, B. J. F., Brandt, D. M., & Bluth, G. J., (1980). Use of top-level structure in text: Key for reading comprehension in ninth-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 72–103.
37. Orrantia, J., (1991). La evaluación de la comprensión lectora: Un enfoque cognitivo. Tesis Doctoral. Universidad de Salamanca.
38. Perrig, W., & Kintsch, W., (1985). Porpositional and situational representational of text. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 503–518.
39. Richgels, D. J., Mcgee, L. M., Lomax, R. G., & Sheard, C., (1987). Awareness of four text structures: Effects on recall of expository text. Reading Research Quarterly, XXII, 177–193.
40. Rinehart, S. D., Stahl, S. A., & Erickson, L. G., (1986). Some effects of summarization training on reading and studying. Reading Research Quarterly, XXI, 422–438.
41. Sánchez, E., (1987). Estructuras textuales y procesos de comprensión: Un procedimiento para instruir en la comprensión de textos. Tesis Doctoral, Universisdad de Salamanca.
42. Sánchez, E., (1989). La instrucción como un medio para examinar los límites de la capacidad de aprendizaje. Conferencia inaugural de curso 1989–90 de las Escuelas Superiores Universitarias de Psicología del Lenguaje y Logopedia. Universidad Pontificia de Salamanca.
43. Sánchez, E., (1990). Estructuras textuales y procesos de comprensión: Un programa para instruir en la comprensión de textos. Estudios de Psicología, 41, 21–40.
44. Sánchez, E., (Dir.) (1997). El compromiso entre lo dado y lo nuevo. Informe final de investigación. DGICYT.
45. Sánchez, E., Orrantia, J., y Rosales, J., (1989). Asimilación del procedimiento de instrucción. En E. Sánchez, Procedimientos para instruir en la comprensión de textos. Madrid: CIDE.
46. Sánchez, E., Orrantia, J., Rosales, J., y De Miguel, E., (1990). Descripción del programa de instrucción. En E., Sánchez (Ed.), La comprensión de textos en el aula. Salamanca: ICE.
47. Sánchez, E., y Rosales, J., (1990). Textos e instrucción. En E., Sánchez (Ed.), La comprensión de textos en el aula. Salamanca: ICE.
48. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C., (1984). Development strategies in text processing. En H., Mandl, N., Stein & T., Trabasso (Eds.), Learning and Comprehension of text. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
49. Short, J. E., & Ryan, E. B., (1983). Metacognitive differences between skilled readers: Remedieting deficits through story grammar and attribution training. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 225–235.
50. Taylor, B. M., (1980). Children's memory for expository test after reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 15, 399–411.
51. Taylor, B. M., & Williams, J. P., (1983). Comprehension of learning-disabled readers: Task and text variations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 743–751.
52. Van Dijk, T. A., (1980). Macrostructures. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
53. Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W., (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
54. Williams, J. P., Taylor, M. B., & Ganger, S., (1981). Text variations at the level of the individual sentence and comprehension of simple expository paragraphs. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 851–865.
55. Wlnograd, P., (1985). Dificultades de estrategia en el resumen de textos. Infamcia y Aprendizaje, 31–32, 67–87.
56. Winograd, P. N., & Bridge, C. A., (1986). The Comprehension of Important Information in Written Prose. En J. F., Baumann (Ed.), Teaching Main Idea Comprehension. Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association.