The market value of cultural heritage in urban areas: An application of spatial hedonic pricing

Journal of Geographical Systems

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 89-114

  Lazrak, Faroek ^a   Nijkamp, Peter ^a,b   Rietveld, Piet ^a   Rouwendal, Jan ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b ADAM MICKIEWICZ UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Cultural heritage; Hedonic prices; Historic buildings; Listed building; Spatial autocorrelation; Spatial statistics; Stated preference methods; Valuation methods

Indexed keywords

AUTOCORRELATION; BUILDING; CULTURAL HERITAGE; HEDONIC ANALYSIS; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; URBAN AREA; VALUATION; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

NETHERLANDS;

EID: 84892488479     PISSN: 14355930     EISSN: 14355949     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10109-013-0188-1     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Abreu M, de Groot HLF, Florax RJGM (2004) Space and growth: a survey of empirical evidence and methods. Working Paper TI 04-129/3. Tinbergen Institute, Amsterdam.
2. Ahlfeldt GM, Waennig W (2010) Substitutability and complementarity of urban amenities: external effects of built heritage in Berlin. Real Estate Econ 38(2): 285-323.
3. Anselin L (1988) Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
4. Anselin L (2006) Spatial econometrics. In: Mills T, Patterson K (eds) Palgrave handbook of econometrics, vol 1., Econometric theoryPalgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp 901-969.
5. Anselin L (2010) Thirty years of spatial econometrics. Pap Reg Sci 89(1): 3-25.
6. Asabere PK, Huffman FE (1994) Historic designation and residential market values. Apprais J 62(1): 396-401.
7. Asabere PK, Huffman FE, Mehdian S (1994) The adverse impacts of local historic designation: the case of small apartment buildings in Philadelphia. J Real Estate Financ Econ 8(2): 225-234.
8. Baranzini A, Ramirex J, Schaerer C, Thalmann P (eds) (2008) Hedonic methods in housing markets: pricing environmental amenities and segregation. Springer, Berlin.
9. Basu S, Thibodeau FG (1998) Analysis of spatial autocorrelation in house prices. J Real Estate Financ Econ 17(1): 61-85.
10. Bitter C, Mulligan G, Dall'erba S (2007) Incorporating spatial variation in housing attribute prices: a comparison of geographically weighted regression and the spatial expansion method. J Geogr Syst 9(1): 7-27.
11. Brasington DM, Hite D (2005) Demand for environmental quality: a spatial hedonic analysis. Reg Sci Urban Econ 35(1): 57-82.
12. Brueckner JK, Thisse JF, Zenou Y (1999) Why is Central Paris rich and downtown Detroit poor? An Amenity-based theory. Eur Econ Rev 43(1): 91-107.
13. Can A (1992) Specification and estimation of hedonic housing price models. Reg Sci Urban Econ 22(3): 453-474.
14. Coulson NE, Lahr ML (2005) Gracing the Land of Elvis and Beale Street: historic designation and property values in Memphis. Real Estate Econ 33(3): 487-508.
15. Coulson NE, Leichenko RM (2001) The internal and external impact of historical designation on property values. J Real Estate Financ Econ 23(2): 113-124.
16. de Vries J, van der Woude AM (1997) The first modern economy: success, failure, and perseverance of the Dutch economy, 1500-1815. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
17. Deodhar V (2004) Does the housing market value heritage? Some empirical evidence, research paper no. 403, Macquarie University, Sydney.
18. Ekeland I, Heckman J, Nesheim L (2002) Identifying hedonic models. Am Econ Rev 92(2): 304-309.
19. Elhorst JP (2010) Applied spatial econometrics: raising the bar. Spatial Econ Anal 5(1): 9-28.
20. Florax R, de Graaff T (2004) The performance of diagnostic tests for spatial autocorrelation in linear regression models: a meta-analysis of simulation studies. In: Anselin L, Florax R, Rey SJ (eds) Advances in spatial econometrics: methodology, tools and applications. Springer, Berlin, pp 29-65.
21. Florax RJGM, Folmer H, Rey SJ (2003) Specification searches in spatial econometrics: the relevance of Hendry's methodology. Reg Sci Urban Econom 33(3): 557-579.
22. Ford DA (1989) The effect of historic district designation on single-family home prices. Real Estate Econ 17(2): 353-362.
23. Fusco Girard L, Nijkamp P (eds) (2009) Cultural tourism and sustainable local development. Ashgate, Aldershot.
24. Glaeser EL, Kolko J, Saiz A (2001) Consumer City. J Econ Geogr 1(1): 27-50.
25. Goodman AC, Thibodeau TG (2003) Housing market segmentation and hedonic prediction accuracy. J Hous Econ 12(2): 181-201.
26. Gorman WM (1956) A possible procedure for analysing quality differentials in the eggs market. Rev Econ Stud 47: 843-856.
27. Koschinsky J, Lozano-Gracia N, Piras G (2011) The welfare benefit of a home's location: an empirical comparison of spatial and non-spatial model estimates. J Geogr Syst 1(1): 1-38.
28. Lancaster KJ (1966) A new approach to consumer theory. J Polit Econ 74(2): 132-157.
29. Lancaster KJ (1979) Author variety, equity, and efficiency: product variety in an industrial society. Columbia University Press, New York.
30. Leichenko RM, Coulson NE, Listokin D (2001) Historic preservation and residential property values: an analysis of Texas cities. Urban Stud 38(9): 1973-1987.
31. LeSage JP, Pace RK (2009) Introduction to spatial econometrics. Chapman and Hall, London.
32. LeSage JP, Pace RK (2012) the biggest myth in spatial econometrics. http://www. wu. ac. at/wgi/en/file_inventory/lesage20120110. Accessed 06 Jun 2012.
33. Malpezzi S (2003) Hedonic pricing models: a selective and applied review. In: O'Sullivan T, Gibb K (eds) Housing economics and public policy. Blackwell Science Ltd, Oxford, pp 67-89.
34. Mur J, Angulo A (2009) Model selection strategies in a spatial setting: some additional results. Reg Sci Urban Econ 39: 200-213.
35. Narwold A, Sandy J, Tu C (2008) Historic designation and residential property values. Int Real Estate Rev 11(1): 83-95.
36. Navrud S, Ready RC (2002) Valuing cultural heritage: applying environmental valuation techniques to historic buildings, monuments and artifacts. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
37. Noonan DS (2003) Contingent valuation and cultural resources: a meta-analytic review of the literature. J Cult Econ 27(2): 159-176.
38. Noonan DS (2007) Finding an impact of preservation policies: price effects of historic landmarks on attached homes in Chicago, 1990-1999. Econ Dev Q 21(1): 17-33.
39. Noonan DS, Krupka DJ (2010) Determinants of historic and cultural landmark designation: why we preserve what we preserve. J Cult Econ 34(1): 1-26.
40. Noonan DS, Krupka DJ (2011) Making-or picking-winners: evidence of internal and external price effects in historic preservation policies. Real Estate Econ 39(2): 379-407.
41. Pace RK, LeSage JP (2006) Interpreting spatial econometric models. Paper presented at the regional science association international North American meetings, Toronto, Ontario.
42. Palmquist RB, Smith VK (2003) The use of hedonic property value techniques for policy and litigation. In: Tietenberg T, Folmer H (eds) The international yearbook of environmental and resource economics 2002/2003. Edard Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 115-164.
43. Rosen S (1974) Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition. J Polit Econ 82(1): 34-55.
44. Ruijgrok ECM (2006) The three economic values of cultural heritage: a case study in The Netherlands. J Cult Herit 7(2): 206-213.
45. Schaeffer PV, Millerick CA (1991) The impact of historic district designation on property values: an empirical study. Econ Dev Q 5: 301-312.
46. Sheppard S (1999) Hedonic analysis of housing markets. In: Mills ES, Cheshire P (eds) Handbook of regional and urban economics, vol 3. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 1595-1635.
47. Snowball JD (2008) Measuring the value of culture: methods and examples in cultural economics. Springer, Berlin.
48. Sopranzetti BJ (2010) Hedonic regression analysis in real estate markets: a primer. In: Lee CF, Lee CA, Lee J (eds) Handbook of quantitative finance and risk management. Springer, Berlin, pp 1201-1207.
49. Taylor LO (2003) The hedonic method. In: Champ PA, Boyle KJ, Brown TC (eds) A primer on non market valuation. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 331-393.
50. Throsby D (2001) Economics and culture. Cambridge University Press, New York.
51. Tobler WR (1970) A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Econ Geogr 46(2): 234-240.
52. Won Kim C, Phipps TT, Anselin T (2003) Measuring the benefits of air quality improvement: a spatial hedonic approach. J Environ Econ Manag 45(1): 24-39.