Model selection strategies in a spatial setting: Some additional results

Regional Science and Urban Economics

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 200-213

  Mur, Jesús ^a   Angulo, Ana ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZARAGOZA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Model selection techniques; Spatial econometrics; Specification strategy

Indexed keywords

ECONOMETRICS; MODELING; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; STRATEGIC APPROACH;

EID: 59349108808     PISSN: 01660462     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.05.018     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Akaike, H., 1973. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In Petrov, B. and F. Cáski (eds.) Second International Symposium on Information Theory, pp. 267-281. Budapest: Akademiai Kaidó. Reprinted in Kort, S. and N. Johnson (eds): Breakthroughs in Statistics, volume I, pp. 599-624. Berlin: Springer.
2. Anselin L. Non-nested tests of the weight structure in spatial autoregressive models: some Monte Carlo results. Journal of Regional Science 26 (1986) 267-284
3. Anselin L. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models (1988), Kluwer, Dordrecht
4. Anselin L., and Florax R. Small sample properties of tests for spatial dependence in regression models: some further results. In: Anselin L., and Florax R. (Eds). New Directions in Spatial Econometrics (1995), Springer, Berlin 21-74
5. Anselin L., and Bera A. Spatial dependence in linear regression models with an introduction to spatial econometrics. In: Ullah A., and Giles D. (Eds). Handbook of Applied Economic Statistics (1998), Marcel Dekker, New York 237-289
6. Anselin L., Bera A., Florax R., and Yoon M. Simple diagnostic tests for spatial dependence. Regional Science and Urban Economics 26 (1996) 77-104
7. Anselin L., Florax R., and Rey S. Econometrics for spatial models: recent advances. In: Anselin L., Florax R., and Rey S. (Eds). Advances in Spatial Econometrics (2004), Springer, New York 1-4
8. Aznar A. Econometric Model Selection: A New Approach (1989), Kluwer, Dordrecht
9. Baltagi B., and Li D. Double length artificial regression for testing spatial dependence. Econometric Reviews 20 (2001) 31-40
10. Bivand R. Regression modelling with spatial dependence: an application of some class selection and estimation methods. Geographical Analysis 16 (1984) 25-37
11. Blommestein H. Specification and estimation of spatial econometric models. A discussion of alternative strategies for spatial economic modelling. Regional Science and Urban Economics 13 (1983) 251-270
12. Box G. Sampling and Bayes' inference in scientific modelling and robustness. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A 143 (1980) 383-430
13. Burnham K., and Anderson D. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference. 2nd edition (2002), Springer, Berlin
14. Burridge P. Testing for a common factor in a spatial autoregression model. Environment and Planning A 13 (1981) 795-800
15. Campos J., Ericsson N., and Hendry D. General-to-Specific Modelling (2005), Edward Elgar, London
16. Charemza W., and Deadman D. New Directions in Econometric Practice (1997), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
17. Chow A. Econometrics (1983), McGraw-Hill, New York
18. Clarke K. Nonparametric model discrimination in international relations. Journal of Conflict Resolution 47 (2003) 72-93
19. Clarke K. A simple distribution-free test for nonnested hypothesis. Working Paper (2004), Department of Political Science, University of Rochester
20. Cox D. Tests of separate families of hypotheses. Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability vol. 1 (1961) 105-123
21. Cox D. Further results on tests of separate families of hypotheses. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B 24 (1962) 406-424
22. Cox D., and Wermuth N. Multivariate dependencies. Models, Analysis and Interpretation (1996), Chapman & Hall, London
23. Danilov D., and Magnus J. On the harm that ignoring pretesting can cause. Journal of Econometrics 122 (2004) 27-46
24. Dastoor N., and McAleer M. Some new comparisons of joint and paired tests for non-nested models under local hypotheses. Econometric Theory 5 (1989) 83-94
25. Davidson J. Econometric Theory (2000), Blackwell, Oxford
26. Davidson R., and MacKinnon J. Several tests for model specification in the presence of alternative hypotheses. Econometrica 88 (1981) 781-793
27. Fisher G., and McAleer M. On the interpretation of the Cox tests in econometrics. Economics Letters 4 (1979) 145-150
28. Florax R., and de Graaff T. The performance of diagnostics tests for spatial dependence in linear regression models: a meta-analysis of simulation studies. In: Anselin L., Florax R., and Rey S. (Eds). Advances in Spatial Econometrics: Methodology, Tools and Applications (2004), Springer, Berlin 29-65
29. Florax R., Folmer H., and Rey S. Specification searches in spatial econometrics: the relevance of Hendry's methodology. Regional Science and Urban Economics 33 (2003) 557-579
30. Florax R., Folmer H., and Rey S. A comment on specification searches in spatial econometrics: the relevance of Hendry's methodology: a reply. Regional Science and Urban Economics 36 (2006) 300-308
31. Fotheringham A., Charlton M., and Brunsdon C. Geographically weighted regression. A natural evolution of the expansion method for spatial data analysis. Environment and Planning A 30 (1999) 1905-1927
32. Gourieroux C., and Monfort A. Statistique et modèles économétriques (1989), Economica, Paris
33. Granger C., King M., and White H. Comments on testing and the use of model selection criteria. Journal of Econometrics 67 (1995) 173-187
34. Hausman D. The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics (1992), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
35. Hendry D. A comment on "Specification searches in spatial econometrics: the relevance of Hendry's methodology". Regional Science and Urban Economics 36 (2006) 309-312
36. Hendry D., and Richard J. On the formulation of empirical models in dynamic econometrics. Journal of Econometrics 20 (1982) 3-33
37. Hendry D., and Richard J. Recent developments in the theory of encompassing. In: Cornet B., and Tulkens H. (Eds). Contributions to Operations Research and Economics (1989), MIT Press, Cambridge 393-440
38. Hendry D., and Krolzig H. The properties of automatic gets modelling. Economic Journal 115 (2005) 32-61
39. Hepple L. Bayesian techniques in spatial and network econometrics: 1. Model comparison and posterior odds. Environment and Planning A 27 (1995) 447-469
40. Hepple L. Bayesian techniques in spatial and network econometrics: 2. Computational methods and algorithms. Environment and Planning A 27 (1995) 615-644
41. Hoover K., and Perez S. Truth and robustness in cross-country growth regressions. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 66 (2004) 765-798
42. King M., and McAleer M. Further results on testing AR (1) against MA (1) disturbances in the linear regression model. Review of Economic Studies 54 (1987) 649-663
43. Leamer E. Specification Searches: Ad-hoc Inference with Nonexperimental Data (1978), John Willey, New York
44. LeSage J. Bayesian estimation of spatial autoregressive models. International Regional Science Review 20 (1997) 113-129
45. LeSage J. A family of geographically weighted regression models. In: Anselin L., Florax R., and Rey S. (Eds). Advances in Spatial Econometrics: Methodology, Tools and Applications (2004), Springer, Berlin 241-264
46. Lütkepohl H. General-to-specific or specific-to-general modelling? An opinion on current econometric terminology. Journal of Econometrics 136 (2007) 319-324
47. Morgan M. The History of Econometric Ideas (1990), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
48. Mur J., Lopez F., and Angulo A. Symptoms of instability in models of spatial dependence. Geographical Analysis 20 (2008) 189-211
49. Pace K., and LeSage J. Spatial autoregressive local estimation. In: Getis A., Mur J., and Zoller H. (Eds). Spatial Econometrics and Spatial Statistics (2004), Palgrave, Londres 31-51
50. Popper K. Objective knowledge. An Evolutionary Approach (1979), Oxford University Press, Oxford
51. Ripley B. Pattern Recognition and Neuronal Networks (1996), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
52. Rivers D., and Vuong Q. Model selection tests for nonlinear dynamic models. Econometrics Journal 5 (2002) 1-39
53. Sawa T. Information criteria for discriminating among alternative regression models. Econometrica 46 (1978) 1273-1291
54. Schwarz C. Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics 6 (1978) 461-464
55. Spanos A. Statistical Foundations of Econometric Modelling (1986), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
56. Spiegelhalter D., Best J., Carlin B., and van der Linde A. Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B 64 (2002) 583-639
57. Trivez J., and Mur J. Some proposals for discriminating between spatial processes. In: Getis A., Mur J., and Zoller H. (Eds). Spatial Econometrics and Spatial Statistics (2004), Palgrave, Houndmills 150-175
58. Vuong Q. Likelihood ratio-tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. Econometrica 57 (1989) 307-333
59. Zellner A. Jeffreys-Bayes posterior odds ratio and the Akaike information criterion for discriminating between models. Economic Letters 1 (1978) 337-342