Hiatal hernia repair with biologic mesh reinforcement reduces recurrence rate in small hiatal hernias

Diseases of the Esophagus

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 13-17

  Schmidt, E ^a   Shaligram, A ^a   Reynoso, J F ^a   Kothari, V ^a   Oleynikov, D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Biologic mesh; Hiatal hernia; Laparoscopy; Paraesophageal

Indexed keywords

PROTON PUMP INHIBITOR;

ABDOMINAL PAIN; ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ANTIREFLUX OPERATION; ARTICLE; ASPIRATION; BLOATING; BODY MASS; COUGHING; DYSPHAGIA; DYSPNEA; ESOPHAGOGASTRODUODENOSCOPY; ESOPHAGUS PH; ESOPHAGUS SURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FOOD REGURGITATION; GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX; HEARTBURN; HIATUS HERNIA; HOARSENESS; HUMAN; LARYNGITIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NAUSEA; ODYNOPHAGIA; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PNEUMOTHORAX; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECURRENCE RISK; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEX RATIO; SMOKING; SORE THROAT; SURGICAL MESH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SUTURE CRUROPLASTY; THORAX PAIN; WHEEZING; YOUNG ADULT;

BIOLOGIC MESH; HIATAL HERNIA; LAPAROSCOPY; PARAESOPHAGEAL;

ACELLULAR DERMIS; ADULT; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; COHORT STUDIES; DIAPHRAGM; FEMALE; HERNIA, HIATAL; HERNIORRHAPHY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RECURRENCE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGICAL MESH; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84892487423     PISSN: 11208694     EISSN: 14422050     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/dote.12042     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Cuschieri A, Shimi S, Nathanson L K. Laparoscopic reduction, crural repair, and fundoplication of large hiatal hernia. Am J Surg 1992; 163: 425-430.
2. Cuschieri A. Laparoscopic antireflux surgery and repair of hiatal hernia. World J Surg 1993; 17: 40-45.
3. Khaitan L, Houston H, Sharp K, Holzman M, Richards W. Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair has an acceptable recurrence rate. Am Surg 2002; 68: 546-551.
4. Hashemi M, Peters J H, DeMeester T R etal. Laparoscopic repair of large type III hiatal hernia: objective followup reveals high recurrence rate. J Am Coll Surg 2000; 190: 553-560.
5. Ferri L E, Feldman L S, Stanbridge D, Mayrand S, Stein L, Fried G M. Should laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair be abandoned in favor of the open approach? Surg Endosc 2005; 19: 4-8.
6. Soper N J, Dunnegan D. Anatomic fundoplication failure after laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Ann Surg 1999; 229: 669-676.
7. Hunter J G, Smith C D, Branum G D etal. Laparoscopic fundoplication failures: patterns of failure and response to fundoplication revision. Ann Surg 1999; 230: 595-604.
8. Carlson M A, Frantzides C T. Complications and results of primary minimally invasive antireflux procedures: a review of 10, 735 reported cases. J Am Coll Surg 2001; 193: 428-439.
9. Granderath F A, Schweiger U M, Kamolz T, Asche K U, Pointner R. Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with prosthetic hiatal closure reduces postoperative intrathoracic wrap herniation: preliminary results of a prospective randomized functional and clinical study. Arch Surg 2005; 140: 40-48.
10. Frantzides C T, Madan A K, Carlson M A, Stavropoulos G P. A prospective, randomized trial of laparoscopic polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) patch repair vs simple cruroplasty for large hiatal hernia. Arch Surg 2002; 137: 649-652.
11. Carlson M A, Richards C G, Frantzides C T. Laparoscopic prosthetic reinforcement of hiatal herniorrhaphy. Dig Surg 1999; 16: 407-410.
12. Hergueta-Delgado P, Marin-Moreno M, Morales-Conde S etal. Transmural migration of a prosthetic mesh after surgery of a paraesophageal hiatal hernia. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64: 120.
13. Stadlhuber R J, Sherif A E, Mittal S K etal. Mesh complications after prosthetic reinforcement of hiatal closure: a 28-case series. Surg Endosc 2009; 23: 1219-1226.
14. Poncet G, Robert M, Roman S, Boulez J C. Laparoscopic repair of large hiatal hernia without prosthetic reinforcement: late results and relevance of anterior gastropexy. J Gastrointest Surg 2010; 14: 1910-1916.
15. Varga G, Cseke L, Kalmar K, Horvath O P. Prevention of recurrence by reinforcement of hiatal closure using ligamentum teres in laparoscopic repair of large hiatal hernias. Surg Endosc 2004; 18: 1051-1053.
16. Antoniou S, Pointner R, Granderath F. Hiatal hernia repair with the use of biologic meshes: a literature review. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2011; 21 (1): 1-9.
17. Ringley C D, Bochkarev V, Ahmed S I, Vitamvas M L, Oleynikov D. Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair with human acellular dermal matrix patch: our initial experience. Am J Surg 2006; 192: 767-772.
18. Lee E, Frisella M M, Matthews B D, Brunt L M. Evaluation of acellular human dermis reinforcement of the crural closure in patients with difficult hiatal hernias. Surg Endosc 2007; 21: 641-645.
19. Oelschlager B K, Barreca M, Chang L, Pellegrini C A. The use of small intestine submucosa in the repair of paraesophageal hernias: initial observations of a new technique. Am J Surg 2003; 186: 4-8.
20. Oelschlager B K, Pellegrini C A, Hunter J etal. Biologic prosthesis reduces recurrence after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial. Ann Surg 2006; 244: 481-490.
21. Oelschlager B K, Pelligrini C A, Hunter J etal. Biologic prosthesis to prevent recurrence after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair:long term follow-up from a multi-center, prospective, randomized trial. J Am Coll Surg 2011; 213: 461-468.
22. Diaz D F, Roth J S. Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair with acellular dermal matrix cruroplasty. JSLS 2011; 15: 355-360.
23. Pfluke J M, Smith C D. Surgeon use of mesh for hiatal hernia repair-a survey of SAGES members. Abstract presentation at SAGES Scientific session and postgraduate course in San Antonio, TX on March 31, 2011.
24. Jones M P, Sloan S S, Rabine J C, Ebert C C, Huang C F, Kahrilas P J. Hiatal hernia size is the dominant determinant of esophagitis presence and severity in gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 1711-1717.
25. Patti M G, Goldberg H I, Arcerito M, Bortolasi L, Tong J, Way L W. Hiatal hernia size affects lower esophageal sphincter function, esophageal acid exposure, and the degree of mucosal injury. Am J Surg 1996; 171 (1): 182-186.
26. Lee Y K, James E, Bochkarev V, Vitamvas M, Oleynikov D. Long-term outcome of cruroplasty reinforcement with human acellular dermal matrix in large paraesophageal hiatal hernia. J Gastrointest Surg 2008; 12: 811-815.
27. Cuschieri A, Hunter J, Wolfe B, Swanstrom L L, Hutson W. Multicenter prospective evaluation of laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Preliminary report. Surg Endosc 1993; 7: 505-510.
28. Goers T A, Cassera M A, Dunst C M, Swanström L L. Paraesophageal hernia repair with biomesh does not increase postoperative dysphagia. J Gastrointest Surg 2011; 15: 1743-1749.
29. Boyce H W. Endoscopic definitions of esophagogastric junction regional anatomy. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 51: 586-592.
30. Trus T L, Bax T, Richardson W S etal. Complications of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair. J Gastrointest Surg 1997; 1: 221-227. discussion 228.
31. Nason K S, Luketich J D, Qureshi I etal. Laparoscopic repair of giant paraesophageal hernia results in long-term patient satisfaction and a durable repair. J Gastrointest Surg 2008; 12: 2066-2075.
32. Klaristenfeld D D, Mahoney E, Iannitti D A. Minimally invasive tension-free inguinal hernia repair. Surg Technol Int 2005; 14: 157-163.
33. Hainaux B, Sattari A, Coppens E, Sadeghi N, Cadière G B. Intrathoracic migration of the wrap after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: radiologic evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 178: 859-862.
34. Schneider R, Herrington J L, Jr, Granda A M. Marlex mesh in repair of a diaphragmatic defect later eroding into the distal esophagus and stomach. Am Surg 1979; 45: 337-339.
35. Strange P S. Small intestinal submucosa for laparoscopic repair of large paraesophageal hiatal hernias: a preliminary report. Surg Technol Int 2003; 11: 141-143.
36. Frantzides C T, Carlson M A, Loizides S etal. Hiatal hernia repair with mesh: a survey of SAGES members. Surg Endosc 2010; 24: 1017-1024.